No sane country’ would allow anchor babies or reward illegals

[longknife]

You are simply not going to believe who said this! Check out this video:







Thank The Lord the man is retiring at the end of his term.



Read more: Harry Reid's jaw-dropping flashback video: 'No sane country' would allow anchor babies or reward illegals - BizPac Review

 

[Moonglow]

Then change the Constitution...

 

[longknife]

Then change the Constitution...

Did you even bother to see WHO WAS MAKING THE COMMENT?

 

[peach174]

Then change the Constitution...

Show us where it says illegal aliens have the right to come here and give birth.
I don't see those words anywhere in our Constitution.

 

[CowboyTed]

Right I would let it them be citizens as long as one parent is either a legal resident for 3 years, Canadian or US Citizen....

What are you giving in return?
A government backed full universal healthcare insurance.

 

[CowboyTed]

Then change the Constitution...

Show us where it says illegal aliens have the right to come here and give birth.
I don't see those words anywhere in our Constitution.

The child is born in the US therefore the child ins a US citizen...

Actually if the Child is conceived in US does that not make hima US citizen.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

 

[RDD_1210]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

 

[bedowin62]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

SPARKY; the US had no formal immigration policy when that was written; so it cant have been meant to refer to immigrants. intent ....................sparky

 

[bedowin62]

the amendment was meant to protect freed slaves from Democrats trying to kill them

true story

 

[CowboyTed]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

SPARKY; the US had no formal immigration policy when that was written; so it cant have been meant to refer to immigrants. intent ....................sparky

ARE FUCKING SERIOUS?

You use every piece of the constitution to say if it is not there it shouldn't be law but when it is clear fucking day you say. Well there was no immigration policy.
HEY DUMBO, When there constitution was written there was immigrants and they were dealt with, therefore there was a an immigrantion policy. No like the one today but there was one...

Now if you want to ignore one part of the constitution then get ready for us to open other parts like gun laws, campaign funding, etc....

So where do you want to go?

 

[bedowin62]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

SPARKY; the US had no formal immigration policy when that was written; so it cant have been meant to refer to immigrants. intent ....................sparky

ARE FUCKING SERIOUS?

You use every piece of the constitution to say if it is not there it shouldn't be law but when it is clear fucking day you say. Well there was no immigration policy.
HEY DUMBO, When there constitution was written there was immigrants and they were dealt with, therefore there was a an immigrantion policy. No like the one today but there was one...

Now if you want to ignore one part of the constitution then get ready for us to open other parts like gun laws, campaign funding, etc....

So where do you want to go?

you poor angry loser; just look at you.............................

 

[bedowin62]

"there were immigrants and they were dealt with......................."

good one idiot. how?

 

[RDD_1210]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

SPARKY; the US had no formal immigration policy when that was written; so it cant have been meant to refer to immigrants. intent ....................sparky

And? How does that discount anything happening now?

Hint - it doesn't.

 

[CowboyTed]

I am offering to give the law above (no retroactive removing of citizenship):

• Full background checks
• Campaign Funding laws (proper ones)
• Compulsory Universal Basic Healthcare Insurance
• Climate Change policy worth a crap

What's the courter offer?

 

[DarkFury]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Notice the words "subject to the jurisdiction of". Mexican nationals do NOT fall under our jurisdiction. They do not fall under our tax laws or SS. ONLY criminal laws which is for anybody here. We have no jurisdiction on if they do or do not pay their taxes/fees or fines in Mexico.

 

[bedowin62]

nobody is "ignoring" anything dullard; we are saying it is being misinterpreted

OH AND IF ANYBODY is showing hypocrisy here it is you left-wingers who always say the Constitution is a living breathing document that needs to change with the times. we arent saying change it; we are saying it was NEVER meant to be interpreted this way

 

[bedowin62]

I am offering to give the law above (no retroactive removing of citizenship):

• Full background checks
• Campaign Funding laws (proper ones)
• Compulsory Universal Basic Healthcare Insurance
• Climate Change policy worth a crap

What's the courter offer?

you're a babbling tool, is the pub open yet?

 

[RDD_1210]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Notice the words "subject to the jurisdiction of". Mexican nationals do NOT fall under our jurisdiction. They do not fall under our tax laws or SS. ONLY criminal laws which is for anybody here. We have no jurisdiction on if they do or do not pay their taxes/fees or fines in Mexico.

It's referring to "persons born or naturalized" here. Try and keep up.

 

[bedowin62]

Then change the Constitution...

Or just stop misinterpreting the Constitution.

Let's hear your expert interpretation of the 14th amendment sparky.

14th Amendment | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

"Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

SPARKY; the US had no formal immigration policy when that was written; so it cant have been meant to refer to immigrants. intent ....................sparky

And? How does that discount anything happening now?

Hint - it doesn't.

always amusing when a leftnut answers his own question. it discounts it because it was never the intended purpose of the law