Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #1
Gee I wonder why?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
No one is showin ID to vote today?
- Thread starter Truthmatters
- Start date
Full-Auto
Gold Member
- Jun 13, 2009
- 13,555
- 1,624
- 153
Gee I wonder why?
Of course you do...
You didnt question why your party got to vote twice or explain the use of super delegates.
Imagine a party election. The left has said many times their party their rules.
Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #3
Brad Friedman: Republicans Require No Photo ID To Vote In Republican Iowa Caucus
Cheryl Allen at the Sec. of State's office confirmed to me Tuesday that while showing photo ID is the "easiest way" to register to vote there, it is by no means a requirement. Folks without photo ID are allowed to sign a simple oath, along with one attester, in order to verify that they are who they say they are.
So not only is it possible to register and vote on the same day in Iowa -- something that Republicans have fought against allowing for most citizens in most other states -- one doesn't even need a photo ID to do it, in an election where the Republicans themselves set all of the rules.
It's almost as if they realize that risking disenfranchisement of any of their own voters in their own caucus would be monumentally stupid -- not to mention potentially illegal and/or unconstitutional to boot, though that has yet to stop them from doing the same in general elections where Democrats may be on the ballot.
Go figure.
Cheryl Allen at the Sec. of State's office confirmed to me Tuesday that while showing photo ID is the "easiest way" to register to vote there, it is by no means a requirement. Folks without photo ID are allowed to sign a simple oath, along with one attester, in order to verify that they are who they say they are.
So not only is it possible to register and vote on the same day in Iowa -- something that Republicans have fought against allowing for most citizens in most other states -- one doesn't even need a photo ID to do it, in an election where the Republicans themselves set all of the rules.
It's almost as if they realize that risking disenfranchisement of any of their own voters in their own caucus would be monumentally stupid -- not to mention potentially illegal and/or unconstitutional to boot, though that has yet to stop them from doing the same in general elections where Democrats may be on the ballot.
Go figure.
Last edited:
Full-Auto
Gold Member
- Jun 13, 2009
- 13,555
- 1,624
- 153
Gee I wonder why?
For a caucus...don't you have to show up at a place, stand in a crowd when the caucus begins then get counted? Not a lot of "show up here, then show up there" taking place.
Iowa Caucuses Explained: The First Electoral Event of 2012 - YouTube
Full-Auto
Gold Member
- Jun 13, 2009
- 13,555
- 1,624
- 153
IF they are not requiring it...THEN THEY ARE WRONG..
I have to show a Id in the states that I have lived in..and guess what..I friggen survived.
this whole id crap is pathetic
It is about the ability to cheat. Nothing else.
Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #8
they know damned well the turnout would go down.
If he had made the rules as strick as the republicans insist they be for real elections they would have had a lower turnout and it would have given MORE evidence to show such measures disenfranchise legal voters while stopping not measurable fraud.
Do as I say not as I do republicans
If he had made the rules as strick as the republicans insist they be for real elections they would have had a lower turnout and it would have given MORE evidence to show such measures disenfranchise legal voters while stopping not measurable fraud.
Do as I say not as I do republicans
Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
they know damned well the turnout would go down.
If he had made the rules as strick as the republicans insist they be for real elections they would have had a lower turnout and it would have given MORE evidence to show such measures disenfranchise legal voters while stopping not measurable fraud.
Do as I say not as I do republicans
omg..disenfranchise LEGAL voters...If they friggen LEGAL, WHY wouldn't they have a id?
Here's a question for you? HOW MANY people in this country don't have ID'S? you and your party seems to know so much?
Last edited:
naturegirl
Gold Member
It's a caucus, not a primary. Everyone is out in the open, you can actually see who's voting for who. There is no secret ballot. Only registered voters are allowed to vote. Seems like being in the open is a concept unknown to the liberals.
They're showing their darn face, how much ID do you need??
They're showing their darn face, how much ID do you need??
Last edited:
Warrior102
Gold Member
- May 22, 2011
- 16,554
- 4,124
- 183
Gee I wonder why?
What bottom feeding knuckle dragger doesn't have an ID card in this day in age, douchenozzle.
Hell - you PERSONALLY have one, required to draw your Food Stamps and other bennies you suck off the government teat.
Conservative
Type 40
Gee I wonder why?
What bottom feeding knuckle dragger doesn't have an ID card in this day in age, douchenozzle.
Hell - you PERSONALLY have one, required to draw your Food Stamps and other bennies you suck off the government teat.
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
Gee I wonder why?
Because a caucus is not a vote?
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
they know damned well the turnout would go down.
If he had made the rules as strick as the republicans insist they be for real elections they would have had a lower turnout and it would have given MORE evidence to show such measures disenfranchise legal voters while stopping not measurable fraud.
Do as I say not as I do republicans
Go down? Less than 30% of registered votors turn out for the caucuses, how much further could it go down?
- Moderator
- #16
Because you have no freakin clue what a caucus is?
Two Thumbs
Platinum Member
Gee I wonder why?
It's a caucus vote for a nomination.
What should be proven is that they are not actually dems coming out to game the numbers.
How do you think Obama won the Hawkeye Cauci on '08? He bussed in people from out of state!
Clinton aide: Obama trying to "manipulate the Iowa caucuses" - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
Personally, I'd like to see ID required for all voting - even a caucus.
Clinton aide: Obama trying to "manipulate the Iowa caucuses" - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
Personally, I'd like to see ID required for all voting - even a caucus.
- May 20, 2009
- 144,630
- 67,114
- 2,330
I wonder how many Democrats voted for Ron Paul today?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 266
- Replies
- 317
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 308
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 294
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 90
- Views
- 162
- Replies
- 54
- Views
- 142
- Replies
- 192
- Views
- 1K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8103
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-