Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't think of a question that this could answer that wouldn't be incredibly offensive to the democratic way of life.
Nor could I.
Oh c'mon. Over-dramatize much?
He was speaking to Conservatives. He was saying what they wanted to hear (how unusual for a politician!). He didn't say he WOULD FIRE Liberals.
You guys are like the Conservs who say Obama is going to fire all Conservs...
Nor could I.
Oh c'mon. Over-dramatize much?
He was speaking to Conservatives. He was saying what they wanted to hear (how unusual for a politician!). He didn't say he WOULD FIRE Liberals.
You guys are like the Conservs who say Obama is going to fire all Conservs...
The implication here is obviously that he advocates for the destruction of political dissent.
Something that can ONLY be considered tyrannical in nature.
In fact, it's almost downright traitorous.
Is this an example of Gingrich brilliance?I think an intelligent conservative wants the right federal employees delivering the right services in a highly efficient way and then wants to get rid of those folks who are in fact wasteful, or those folks who are ideologically so far to the left, or those people who want to frankly dictate to the rest of us, Gingrich said in response to a question from a federal employee at the forum
A report by the Justice Departments internal investigators found that Bush administration officials discriminated against liberal employees in the Civil Rights Division and hired lawyers based on their conservative ideology.
He's out anyway so who cares?
Well, Newt sure worded that quite badly.
I can't think of a question that this could answer that wouldn't be incredibly offensive to the democratic way of life.
Nor could I.
Oh c'mon. Over-dramatize much?
He was speaking to Conservatives. He was saying what they wanted to hear (how unusual for a politician!). He didn't say he WOULD FIRE Liberals.
You guys are like the Conservs who say Obama is going to fire all Conservs...
The implication here is obviously that he advocates for the destruction of political dissent.
Something that can ONLY be considered tyrannical in nature.
In fact, it's almost downright traitorous.
Nah. That's hyper-hysterics. The implication here is that he was pandering to his audience. And you expect politicians to do what, exactly???