Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
A New York Times article has reported an acknowledgment by John Kerry that the 2004 presidential election may have been stolen. Kerry implicates the type of election fraud which happens at the machine vote-counting level, which election integrity activists have been warning about for years.
Referring to the machine count of the paper ballots in the controversial
swing state of Ohio election results, Kerry told Brian Lehrer on WYC radio's
Brian Lehrer Show last September that his campaign had asked for, but was denied, the opportunity to examine the software which counts the votes on the paper ballots as they are fed into the machines.
Kerry said:
“We were told by the court that you were not able to get that
algorithm to check it, because it was proprietary information,”
The "algorithm" refers to the tabulation program which is supposed to accurately add votes as candidates receive them. The same type of machine involved in the Ohio controversy was used in a demonstration of machine hacking in the 2006 HBO documentary Hacking Democracy. Rather than simply add the votes, the machine was programmed, in short order, to subtract rather than add votes from targeted candidates.
One way to discover malicious instructions would be to examine the software code
after each election. Kerry was pointing out that most of US vote-counting machine software is secret.
Three companies dominate the US elections market: Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic and Sequoia Voting Systems.
Had Kerry won in Ohio in 2004, he would have won the presidential election. As a result of being declared the victor, George W. Bush was able to escalate the war in Iraq from 120,000 to nearly 170,000 US combat troops. That period coincided with the highest number of US casualties in the war.
....
In 2012 some of the election results of a stoutly anti-war Republican primary candidate, Ron Paul, were studied by mathematicians, and found to exhibit signs of machine vote-count hacking. The type of analysis used, cumulative vote tally (CVT) charting, also has been applied to other races since, with similarly unexplained results.
Dubya’s 2004 win and Trump’s 2016 win prove how stupid Americans can beI'd be surprised if half of the congresscritters sitting in office really belong there.
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
A New York Times article has reported an acknowledgment by John Kerry that the 2004 presidential election may have been stolen. Kerry implicates the type of election fraud which happens at the machine vote-counting level, which election integrity activists have been warning about for years.
Referring to the machine count of the paper ballots in the controversial
swing state of Ohio election results, Kerry told Brian Lehrer on WYC radio's
Brian Lehrer Show last September that his campaign had asked for, but was denied, the opportunity to examine the software which counts the votes on the paper ballots as they are fed into the machines.
Kerry said:
“We were told by the court that you were not able to get that
algorithm to check it, because it was proprietary information,”
The "algorithm" refers to the tabulation program which is supposed to accurately add votes as candidates receive them. The same type of machine involved in the Ohio controversy was used in a demonstration of machine hacking in the 2006 HBO documentary Hacking Democracy. Rather than simply add the votes, the machine was programmed, in short order, to subtract rather than add votes from targeted candidates.
One way to discover malicious instructions would be to examine the software code
after each election. Kerry was pointing out that most of US vote-counting machine software is secret.
Three companies dominate the US elections market: Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic and Sequoia Voting Systems.
Had Kerry won in Ohio in 2004, he would have won the presidential election. As a result of being declared the victor, George W. Bush was able to escalate the war in Iraq from 120,000 to nearly 170,000 US combat troops. That period coincided with the highest number of US casualties in the war.
....
In 2012 some of the election results of a stoutly anti-war Republican primary candidate, Ron Paul, were studied by mathematicians, and found to exhibit signs of machine vote-count hacking. The type of analysis used, cumulative vote tally (CVT) charting, also has been applied to other races since, with similarly unexplained results.
Republicans can’t win without cheating
Voter fraud and election fraud are two different things.Republicans can’t win without cheating
Aren't the dems the ones who say voting fraud is made up and that people are too stupid to have IDs.
Dubya’s 2004 win and Trump’s 2016 win prove how stupid Americans can beI'd be surprised if half of the congresscritters sitting in office really belong there.
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
A New York Times article has reported an acknowledgment by John Kerry that the 2004 presidential election may have been stolen. Kerry implicates the type of election fraud which happens at the machine vote-counting level, which election integrity activists have been warning about for years.
Referring to the machine count of the paper ballots in the controversial
swing state of Ohio election results, Kerry told Brian Lehrer on WYC radio's
Brian Lehrer Show last September that his campaign had asked for, but was denied, the opportunity to examine the software which counts the votes on the paper ballots as they are fed into the machines.
Kerry said:
“We were told by the court that you were not able to get that
algorithm to check it, because it was proprietary information,”
The "algorithm" refers to the tabulation program which is supposed to accurately add votes as candidates receive them. The same type of machine involved in the Ohio controversy was used in a demonstration of machine hacking in the 2006 HBO documentary Hacking Democracy. Rather than simply add the votes, the machine was programmed, in short order, to subtract rather than add votes from targeted candidates.
One way to discover malicious instructions would be to examine the software code
after each election. Kerry was pointing out that most of US vote-counting machine software is secret.
Three companies dominate the US elections market: Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic and Sequoia Voting Systems.
Had Kerry won in Ohio in 2004, he would have won the presidential election. As a result of being declared the victor, George W. Bush was able to escalate the war in Iraq from 120,000 to nearly 170,000 US combat troops. That period coincided with the highest number of US casualties in the war.
....
In 2012 some of the election results of a stoutly anti-war Republican primary candidate, Ron Paul, were studied by mathematicians, and found to exhibit signs of machine vote-count hacking. The type of analysis used, cumulative vote tally (CVT) charting, also has been applied to other races since, with similarly unexplained results.
Voter fraud is bullshit.Republicans can’t win without cheating
Aren't the dems the ones who say voting fraud is made up and that people are too stupid to have IDs.
We didn't know what he would become at the time.Dubya’s 2004 win and Trump’s 2016 win prove how stupid Americans can beI'd be surprised if half of the congresscritters sitting in office really belong there.
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
A New York Times article has reported an acknowledgment by John Kerry that the 2004 presidential election may have been stolen. Kerry implicates the type of election fraud which happens at the machine vote-counting level, which election integrity activists have been warning about for years.
Referring to the machine count of the paper ballots in the controversial
swing state of Ohio election results, Kerry told Brian Lehrer on WYC radio's
Brian Lehrer Show last September that his campaign had asked for, but was denied, the opportunity to examine the software which counts the votes on the paper ballots as they are fed into the machines.
Kerry said:
“We were told by the court that you were not able to get that
algorithm to check it, because it was proprietary information,”
The "algorithm" refers to the tabulation program which is supposed to accurately add votes as candidates receive them. The same type of machine involved in the Ohio controversy was used in a demonstration of machine hacking in the 2006 HBO documentary Hacking Democracy. Rather than simply add the votes, the machine was programmed, in short order, to subtract rather than add votes from targeted candidates.
One way to discover malicious instructions would be to examine the software code
after each election. Kerry was pointing out that most of US vote-counting machine software is secret.
Three companies dominate the US elections market: Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic and Sequoia Voting Systems.
Had Kerry won in Ohio in 2004, he would have won the presidential election. As a result of being declared the victor, George W. Bush was able to escalate the war in Iraq from 120,000 to nearly 170,000 US combat troops. That period coincided with the highest number of US casualties in the war.
....
In 2012 some of the election results of a stoutly anti-war Republican primary candidate, Ron Paul, were studied by mathematicians, and found to exhibit signs of machine vote-count hacking. The type of analysis used, cumulative vote tally (CVT) charting, also has been applied to other races since, with similarly unexplained results.
What about dubya's dubious 2000 win?
Republicans can’t win without cheating
Republicans can't win without Democrats proffering cheating as the cause for their loss.
No he won't.well, we can have some solace knowing that one day G W will be roasting in Hell right along side Hitler & Mussolini
Did you hate em when they were shilling for the Iraq War?Republicans can’t win without cheating
The New York Times sold its soul to Satan years ago. I see that has not only reversed, it has gotten deeper into the mire of cheerful lying to create a pathos. Doesn't work any more.
What a bunch of dumbells run that rag? Oh, wait, that's the home away from home for democrat shills.
Sorry to be the one who has to break it to you, but President Bush won. John Kerry has a way of beating himself up. He angered vets, and that's the best way a politician can fill out his own unemployment form.I'd be surprised if half of the congresscritters sitting in office really belong there.
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
New York Times: John Kerry Says History-Changing 2004 Election May Have Been Rigged After All
A New York Times article has reported an acknowledgment by John Kerry that the 2004 presidential election may have been stolen. Kerry implicates the type of election fraud which happens at the machine vote-counting level, which election integrity activists have been warning about for years.
Referring to the machine count of the paper ballots in the controversial
swing state of Ohio election results, Kerry told Brian Lehrer on WYC radio's
Brian Lehrer Show last September that his campaign had asked for, but was denied, the opportunity to examine the software which counts the votes on the paper ballots as they are fed into the machines.
Kerry said:
“We were told by the court that you were not able to get that
algorithm to check it, because it was proprietary information,”
The "algorithm" refers to the tabulation program which is supposed to accurately add votes as candidates receive them. The same type of machine involved in the Ohio controversy was used in a demonstration of machine hacking in the 2006 HBO documentary Hacking Democracy. Rather than simply add the votes, the machine was programmed, in short order, to subtract rather than add votes from targeted candidates.
One way to discover malicious instructions would be to examine the software code
after each election. Kerry was pointing out that most of US vote-counting machine software is secret.
Three companies dominate the US elections market: Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic and Sequoia Voting Systems.
Had Kerry won in Ohio in 2004, he would have won the presidential election. As a result of being declared the victor, George W. Bush was able to escalate the war in Iraq from 120,000 to nearly 170,000 US combat troops. That period coincided with the highest number of US casualties in the war.
In 2012 some of the election results of a stoutly anti-war Republican primary candidate, Ron Paul, were studied by mathematicians, and found to exhibit signs of machine vote-count hacking. The type of analysis used, cumulative vote tally (CVT) charting, also has been applied to other races since, with similarly unexplained results.
Lesh, I posted at the NYTimes forum for 5 years until they closed it down. I know how pissed off they were save one real journalist, William Safire. Now that he's gone, the lid's off the NYT cesspool. And how they love a stink. Especially when it's a lie.Did you hate em when they were shilling for the Iraq War?Republicans can’t win without cheating
The New York Times sold its soul to Satan years ago. I see that has not only reversed, it has gotten deeper into the mire of cheerful lying to create a pathos. Doesn't work any more.
What a bunch of dumbells run that rag? Oh, wait, that's the home away from home for democrat shills.
well, we can have some solace knowing that one day G W will be roasting in Hell right along side Hitler & Mussolini
