Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
. They keep claiming the towers came down faster than free fall in a vacuum,
Why do you feel the need to lie like that? What is your true agenda here? Don't talk if nobody can believe a word out of your mouth...Nobody has ever claimed that from what I've seen in my endless research.
Everybody knows that all three world trade center buildings collapsed at CLOSE to freefall speeds.
Somehow the vertical steel support columns in each building that run from bedrock to the top floor which are welded together fusing them to be one piece all the way up....cut themselves and blew out of the way fast enough for the top floors in each building to hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.
A ball dropped right beside each buildings top floor would hit the ground only a few seconds before the top floor would in each building......even though the top floor in each building had many vertical support columns holding them up.......
Grow a damn braincell or two..................
That's bullshit. Are you telling everyone here that the total collapse time, from the moment the collapse initiated to the time the entire tower had come down was only 11 seconds? If that's the case then you're going to have to explain why a portion of the core was seen still standing after the dust cleared enough for all to see and then IT collapsed.
Please explain how you get 11 seconds as the full collapse time.
Why do you feel the need to lie like that? What is your true agenda here? Don't talk if nobody can believe a word out of your mouth...Nobody has ever claimed that from what I've seen in my endless research.
Everybody knows that all three world trade center buildings collapsed at CLOSE to freefall speeds.
Somehow the vertical steel support columns in each building that run from bedrock to the top floor which are welded together fusing them to be one piece all the way up....cut themselves and blew out of the way fast enough for the top floors in each building to hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.
A ball dropped right beside each buildings top floor would hit the ground only a few seconds before the top floor would in each building......even though the top floor in each building had many vertical support columns holding them up.......
Grow a damn braincell or two..................
That's bullshit. Are you telling everyone here that the total collapse time, from the moment the collapse initiated to the time the entire tower had come down was only 11 seconds? If that's the case then you're going to have to explain why a portion of the core was seen still standing after the dust cleared enough for all to see and then IT collapsed.
Please explain how you get 11 seconds as the full collapse time.
Fuck you and your deflection tactic you piece of shit......the top floor still suposedly crushed vertical support columns all the way down and had those collapse times.
Fuck you, you disinfo piece of shit!
That's bullshit. Are you telling everyone here that the total collapse time, from the moment the collapse initiated to the time the entire tower had come down was only 11 seconds? If that's the case then you're going to have to explain why a portion of the core was seen still standing after the dust cleared enough for all to see and then IT collapsed.
Please explain how you get 11 seconds as the full collapse time.
Fuck you and your deflection tactic you piece of shit......the top floor still suposedly crushed vertical support columns all the way down and had those collapse times.
Fuck you, you disinfo piece of shit!
Really?
Read what you just wrote again dumbass. How can your claim that the top floor crushed vertical columns ALL THE WAY DOWN when there are pictures of the PARTIAL CORE still standing AFTER the perimeter columns and floors are gone?!
God you're fucking dumb. Yes there was a partial core still standing towards the bottom.....but it still had to continue crushing the rest of the core columns that WEREN'T still standing.
God you're fucking dumb. Yes there was a partial core still standing towards the bottom.....but it still had to continue crushing the rest of the core columns that WEREN'T still standing.
so your claim is that the entire building collapsed except the part that didnt collapse and therefore proves explosive demolitions were used?
so if the buildings were demolished with explosives why did part of the core still stand after the collapse. any controlled demolition would certainly need to take out the building core at its base.
he also ignores that the lower level box columns were STRONGERWell because you believe that the building fell straight down as if there was some sort of gyroscopic device guiding it down. In actuality, since it wasn't a controlled demolition, there was a diffusion of the wreckage on the way down and by the time it got to the extreme bottom of the towers, there was little left to compact the lower floors and it was sustainable. Try thinking.
God you're fucking dumb. Yes there was a partial core still standing towards the bottom.....but it still had to continue crushing the rest of the core columns that WEREN'T still standing.
so your claim is that the entire building collapsed except the part that didnt collapse and therefore proves explosive demolitions were used?
so if the buildings were demolished with explosives why did part of the core still stand after the collapse. any controlled demolition would certainly need to take out the building core at its base.
The fact that a partial of the bottom of the core stood strong reinforces that explosives were used and planted in the upper floors to blow the supports out of the way to achieve these collapse speeds.
How the fuck did a section of the very bottom of the supports that supported ALL the weight and had ALL the fucking debris fall on them still stand and sections of the core with far less weight and debris on them collapse near the top? Because the very bottom didn't have fucking explosives blowing the columns out of the way.....
Fucking moron...
so your claim is that the entire building collapsed except the part that didnt collapse and therefore proves explosive demolitions were used?
so if the buildings were demolished with explosives why did part of the core still stand after the collapse. any controlled demolition would certainly need to take out the building core at its base.
The fact that a partial of the bottom of the core stood strong reinforces that explosives were used and planted in the upper floors to blow the supports out of the way to achieve these collapse speeds.
How the fuck did a section of the very bottom of the supports that supported ALL the weight and had ALL the fucking debris fall on them still stand and sections of the core with far less weight and debris on them collapse near the top? Because the very bottom didn't have fucking explosives blowing the columns out of the way.....
Fucking moron...
ok... let me get this straight. you claim that they tried to blow up the world trade center from the top but didnt go down to the bottom. they just stopped planting explosives at some random point.
and for some reason the explosives didnt explode while the building was burning and planes hitting and cutting through the building did nothing to the wiring of all these explosives.
plus they waited until witnesses saw the building was leaning and starting to buckle before starting to explode the building.
and then you need to explain how we can actually see the building buckle and start to collapse WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN7B5Z7o6Q4]YouTube - WTC Demolition Debunked[/ame]
so your claim is that the entire building collapsed except the part that didnt collapse and therefore proves explosive demolitions were used?
so if the buildings were demolished with explosives why did part of the core still stand after the collapse. any controlled demolition would certainly need to take out the building core at its base.
The fact that a partial of the bottom of the core stood strong reinforces that explosives were used and planted in the upper floors to blow the supports out of the way to achieve these collapse speeds.
How the fuck did a section of the very bottom of the supports that supported ALL the weight and had ALL the fucking debris fall on them still stand and sections of the core with far less weight and debris on them collapse near the top? Because the very bottom didn't have fucking explosives blowing the columns out of the way.....
Fucking moron...
ok... let me get this straight. you claim that they tried to blow up the world trade center from the top but didnt go down to the bottom. they just stopped planting explosives at some random point.
and for some reason the explosives didnt explode while the building was burning and planes hitting and cutting through the building did nothing to the wiring of all these explosives.
plus they waited until witnesses saw the building was leaning and starting to buckle before starting to explode the building.
and then you need to explain how we can actually see the building buckle and start to collapse WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN7B5Z7o6Q4]YouTube - WTC Demolition Debunked[/ame]
Well, that one is an easy one. These buildings are VERY tall. The explosives are put on the lower levels of the building tht was not harmed by the plane. Trapping the people over the top of those floors.
anyone with a lick of common sense knows that all troofers are fucking morons
. They keep claiming the towers came down faster than free fall in a vacuum,
Why do you feel the need to lie like that? What is your true agenda here? Don't talk if nobody can believe a word out of your fucking mouth...Nobody has ever claimed that from what I've seen in my endless research.
Everybody knows that all three world trade center buildings collapsed at CLOSE to freefall speeds.
Somehow the vertical steel support columns in each building that run from bedrock to the top floor which are welded together fusing them to be one piece all the way up....cut themselves and blew out of the way fast enough for the top floors in each building to hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.
A ball dropped right beside each buildings top floor would hit the ground only a few seconds before the top floor would in each building......even though the top floor in each building had many vertical support columns holding them up.......
Grow a damn braincell or two..................
. They keep claiming the towers came down faster than free fall in a vacuum,
Why do you feel the need to lie like that? What is your true agenda here? Don't talk if nobody can believe a word out of your fucking mouth...Nobody has ever claimed that from what I've seen in my endless research.
Everybody knows that all three world trade center buildings collapsed at CLOSE to freefall speeds.
Somehow the vertical steel support columns in each building that run from bedrock to the top floor which are welded together fusing them to be one piece all the way up....cut themselves and blew out of the way fast enough for the top floors in each building to hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.
A ball dropped right beside each buildings top floor would hit the ground only a few seconds before the top floor would in each building......even though the top floor in each building had many vertical support columns holding them up.......
Grow a damn braincell or two..................
Its from one of your videos that you keep posting over and over.
I am not the one coming up with these insane numbers. I am giving them back to you, as you inflict them on us.
Now if you look at that picture you keep posting, you will notice that debris is way down below the level of floor failure.
Steel is strong stuff at normal temperatures, but it isnt strong enough to withstand being pounded by 15 floors worth of material, plus all the `live load` or the things that were in the building besides the structural components. There is a limit to the amount of abuse that a structure (or a message board member) can take before it fails.
This pretty much sums up why the twoof movement hasn't gone anywhere in 8 years:
This pretty much sums up why the twoof movement hasn't gone anywhere in 8 years:
National Geographic just aired some debunking propaganda, which nowadays somehow replaces new official investigations, and said 1/3 of all Americans believe 9/11 was an inside job.
Surely if more Americans took the time to look into it then the percentage would be much higher.
It is you and your fellow debunking dumbasses that are the fucking piece of shits trying to sway and keep from having a new investigation.
In your twisted fucking mind you somehow think you stand for what's right by trying to sway away from a new investigation......
This pretty much sums up why the twoof movement hasn't gone anywhere in 8 years:
National Geographic just aired some debunking propaganda, which nowadays somehow replaces new official investigations, and said 1/3 of all Americans believe 9/11 was an inside job.
Surely if more Americans took the time to look into it then the percentage would be much higher.
It is you and your fellow debunking dumbasses that are the fucking piece of shits trying to sway and keep from having a new investigation.
In your twisted fucking mind you somehow think you stand for what's right by trying to sway away from a new investigation......
