Nany Pelosi sure knows how to pick stocks

Both Democrat and Republican officials, among others, claim the failure to reform this area of law is likely due to the fact that any passed reform would be to each elected Congressman’s personal detriment. Despite holding a majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate from 2020-2022, Democrats elected not to push through legislation that would overhaul the STOCK Act and address congressional insider trading. Democrat leaders claimed this was a tactical move, intended to ensure that any reform is done the right way so as to not be a repeat of the STOCK Act’s failing. Several Republican officials (as well as many officials inside the Democratic party) claim instead that Democrats chose not to pass legislation of this sort, despite bipartisan support, based on their personal interests to the contrary. While the Democrats did not see the “Red Wave” that was forecasted in the 2022 elections, their success in the midterms does not necessarily solve the wonder of why the party would pass up a chance to accomplish meaningful reform that they could champion in future elections. Despite the lack of indictment on Democrat leadership for their failure to reform congressional insider trading laws, reform remains highly popular among both party’s constituents. Thus, many believe the Democrats missed a free opportunity to gain points with voters on a heavily scrutinized issue based on their own conflicts.
 
The STOCK act was quickly and quietly overturned.



sigh. Wrong again. Stain will spin & twist every opportunity.

That's what happened when Congress moved to undo large parts of a popular law known as the STOCK Act last week. APRIL 16, 2013. At least not all gone on this date.

Still, two major elements of the law remain. Insider trading is illegal, even for members of Congress and the executive branch. And for those who are covered by the now-narrower law, disclosures of large stock trades are required within 45 days. It will just be harder to get to them.
 
sigh. Wrong again.

That's what happened when Congress moved to undo large parts of a popular law known as the STOCK Act last week. APRIL 16, 2013

Still, two major elements of the law remain. Insider trading is illegal, even for members of Congress and the executive branch. And for those who are covered by the now-narrower law, disclosures of large stock trades are required within 45 days. It will just be harder to get to them.

Odd, I posted a link noting what happened in 2013 and you seem to believe it happened last week.
 
you really are a troublemaker? I posted they changed parts of it (not all of it as you posted) in APRIL, 2013

They changed it so that it was no longer illegal. The entire STOCK act was a scam as they knew they were going to quickly rescind it.
 
What is possible is that as the lunacy of what her party has done will come back to haunt her and many more. Future people in power taking much of the wealth away from those with much more than the peasants. We keep moving left even as we talk about all of this.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...controversial-stock-trade/ar-AA1nmTvO[/QUOTE]
View attachment 935192


Nancy Pelosi recently realized a $1.8 million profit from a stock investment in NVIDIA over the short period of 92 days.

She sure is smart. I had no idea.
What laws were broken? Also, it's pretty hard not to make money in NVDA over the past 20 years. What exactly is your point here, know nothing?
 
IIRC the Governor of Arkansas' salary was a mere $35,000/annum. And the largest corporation in Arkansas was Walmart.

Guess who was put on Walmart's board of directors after slick willy obtained that prized $35k/year job.

Next thing you know, the Clinton's are multimillionaires.

Do the math.

Why was Hillary allowed to be the sole arbiter of where the Haiti money went?

Things that make you go, Hmmmm?

 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top