My political philosophy

Discussion in 'Introduce Yourself' started by Skeptik, Oct 19, 2008.

  1. Skeptik
    Offline

    Skeptik Astute observer

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    727
    Thanks Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    The late great Bear Flag Republic
    Ratings:
    +98
    For future reference, my political philosophy is outlined here:

    A fully formed philosophy must include at least three dimensions, not the usual one dimensional, left to right, or conservative to liberal model with the individual placing him/herself usually somewhere near the center.

    The right to left, or let’s call it the X axis of my model, goes from limited government to big government. I think it is safe to say that conservatives are supposed to support a limited government, lower taxes, and less intrusion into individual affairs.

    The so called conservative administration currently in the white house could not be called conservative by that definition, not while increasing the power and expense of the federal government.

    Nor could a “social conservative” stance against gay marriage and abortion be considered rightist by the definition I’ve just given, as that idea advocates that the government, not the individual, make some basic life decisions.

    None of that means that conservatives are being hypocritical, not when you add the Y and Z axes to the model. The issue of gay marriage is on the Y axis, authoritarian to libertarian, and has nothing to do with the right to left continuum. The authoritarian would have the government use its authority to dictate who might marry who, while the libertarian would leave that decision to the individual. The issue of abortion is on the same axis.

    The Z axis of the model is from pragmatist to ideologue. Take, for example, the issue of universal health coverage. This issue has been labeled as an extreme liberal position, but is it really?

    A pragmatist would favor this syllogism:

    The US is the only developed country without universal coverage,
    We pay more than any other country in the world for health care,
    Therefore, we should consider universal coverage.

    While an ideologue would be more likely to favor this one:
    Universal care is socialistic
    Socialism doesn’t work,
    Therefore, universal care won’t work.

    That explained, my philosophy is at the smaller government side of the X axis, on the extreme libertarian edge of the Y axis, and at the pragmatist extreme of the Z axis.

    Conservatives will still call me a liberal, of course, since I think Bush is an idiot, abortion should be an individual’s choice, and the war in Iraq was a mistake.

    Liberals might call me a conservative, since I constantly rant about the cost and power of the federal government.

    Call me what you like, as I don’t subscribe to a one dimensional philosophy. I’m a pragmatic libertarian conservative.

    Addendum: Since I wrote this several months ago, I've become so disillusioned with the federal government that I favor leaving the question of health care to the states, rather than to that black hole that sucks in dollars, never again to see the light of day. Perhaps one day some sanity might creep into the federal bureaucracy, but as of now, the feds are incapable of doing more than throwing money at a problem and hoping it will go away.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2008
  2. random3434
    Offline

    random3434 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    25,903
    Thanks Received:
    7,188
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +7,194
    I like your avatar and your sig line!

    Welcome!

    (uh, is there a quiz later on what you just posted?)
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2008
  3. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,299
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,306
    Welcome. We share a similar political philosophy.

    Beware the Obamabots. They will give you negative reps if they disagree with you. The Republicans don't seem to do this.
     
  4. Skeptik
    Offline

    Skeptik Astute observer

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    727
    Thanks Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    The late great Bear Flag Republic
    Ratings:
    +98
    Thanks.

    There is only a quiz for someone who posts a "liberals (conservatives) are ruining the country" sort of post.:D

    I'll beware of anyone who is too committed to either candidate.

    I've found the McCainiacs to be just as bad as the Obamabots on other forums. Maybe this one will be different.
     
  5. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    17,590
    Thanks Received:
    1,581
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,027
    Who do you support?
     
  6. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    thats because for the most part, the republicans are just as pissed off as you are that the republicans elected dont do this already
     
  7. random3434
    Offline

    random3434 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    25,903
    Thanks Received:
    7,188
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +7,194
    Good luck on that.......
     
  8. strollingbones
    Offline

    strollingbones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,593
    Thanks Received:
    15,609
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    chicken farm
    Ratings:
    +31,897
    his entry is kinda like math....
     

Share This Page