"Muslim Animals" & "Remembering 9/11."

[sealadaigh]

this is what some of you posters remind me of when you utter these words.

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11

As Sikhs confront Wisconsin temple shooting tragedy, members of the community reflect on 11 years of 'Bin Laden' taunts and misunderstanding

Chris McGreal in Oak Creek guardian.co.uk, Monday 6 August 2012 18.38 EDT

A few days after the al-Qaida attacks more than a decade ago, a Sikh man, Balbir Singh Sodhi, was shot dead in Arizona by a man who assumed he was a Muslim. Other attacks followed and the passing of time has not diminished the false assumptions.

In April, 92 members of Congress signed a letter urging the FBI to collect information on hate crimes against Sikhs. The effort was led by a New York Congressman, Joe Crowley, who said the Sikh community "is acutely susceptible to violence because of their appearance".

Amardeep Singh, of the Sikh Coalition, said that in addressing audiences since 9/11 he usually poses a question. "When you see a turban and beard, what is the first thing you think of? The answer is inevitably what? I think of a terrorist. We've had 11 years where the turban is equated with terrorism," he said. "Is our community an intentional victim? … No, we're collateral damage."

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11 | World news | guardian.co.uk

many sikhs, in an exemplary display of grace and a deep understanding, used what to them is surely a great personal tragedy to plea for a greater understanding of all cultures, many times emphasizing the muslims in this plea. that is what sikhs are about, truly an extraordinary culture andd religion.

many of us, all of us, could learn from the example they are setting.

 

[Warrior102]

Sikhs are good, hard-working, pro-American people. That's why they came to the U.S. There are many in our community and they're good folks.

Unlike filthy Muslim Islamic whack jobs who come here to do us harm.

 

[patrickcaturday]

this is what some of you posters remind me of when you utter these words.

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11

As Sikhs confront Wisconsin temple shooting tragedy, members of the community reflect on 11 years of 'Bin Laden' taunts and misunderstanding

Chris McGreal in Oak Creek guardian.co.uk, Monday 6 August 2012 18.38 EDT

A few days after the al-Qaida attacks more than a decade ago, a Sikh man, Balbir Singh Sodhi, was shot dead in Arizona by a man who assumed he was a Muslim. Other attacks followed and the passing of time has not diminished the false assumptions.

In April, 92 members of Congress signed a letter urging the FBI to collect information on hate crimes against Sikhs. The effort was led by a New York Congressman, Joe Crowley, who said the Sikh community "is acutely susceptible to violence because of their appearance".

Amardeep Singh, of the Sikh Coalition, said that in addressing audiences since 9/11 he usually poses a question. "When you see a turban and beard, what is the first thing you think of? The answer is inevitably what? I think of a terrorist. We've had 11 years where the turban is equated with terrorism," he said. "Is our community an intentional victim? … No, we're collateral damage."

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11 | World news | guardian.co.uk

many sikhs, in an exemplary display of grace and a deep understanding, used what to them is surely a great personal tragedy to plea for a greater understanding of all cultures, many times emphasizing the muslims in this plea. that is what sikhs are about, truly an extraordinary culture andd religion.

many of us, all of us, could learn from the example they are setting.

Suspicious fire destroys Mo. mosque hit by arsonist in July
Comments By Michael Winter, USA TODAY Updated 12h 24m ago


A firefighter hoses down the smoldering remains of the Islamic Society of Joplin, Mo. Last month, an arsonist set fire to the mosque's roof but damage was minor. The FBI is investigating. CAPTIONBy T. Rob Brown, The Joplin Globe, via APA suspicious fire destroyed a Joplin, Mo., mosque early today, just a month after its roof was damaged by an arsonist, according to news reports.

The Islamic Society of Joplin served about 50 families. Several members are doctors in area hospitals. It opened in 2007, and in 2008 an arsonist burned its sign, the Associated Press says.

The FBI is investigating whether today's fire, reported about 3:30 a.m., was arson and a hate crime. A fire-damaged surveillance camera was sent to the FBI, a fire official told the Globe.


Imam Lahmuddin, the leader of the Islamic Society of Joplin, Mo., outside the remains of the mosque Monday. CAPTIONBy T. Rob Brown, The Joplin Globe, via APThe fire came during Ramadan, Muslims' holy month. The mosque's leader, Imam Lahmuddin, told The Joplin Globe that he and several worshipers left about 11:20 p.m. Sunday after prayers and were to return at 5 a.m.

"This should not stop us from serving God," he said. "We still have to fulfill our obligation. We will do our prayer in other places. If we don't find a place, we will do our prayers in our home. We cannot miss any of the five prayers."

Suspicious fire destroys Mo. mosque hit by arsonist in July



Remember according to Roudy these are animals so I don't know why it has made the national news as it would be according to Roudy no more important than burning out an ant hill.

 

[mememe]

Remembering 9/11

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...ieWyBw&usg=AFQjCNFivcuMEqgreKyEO0cSBqHentXiog



And if to remember that US finances supports and fights alongside radical terrorist Muslim groups, one has to ask: if Muslim terrorists are "animals", what does it make the US?

 

[Jos]

Jewish Groups Grab Huge Share of Grants
Almost All Homeland Security Grants Go to Jewish Non-Profits

Jewish institutions throughout the United States will receive $9.7 million in federal anti-terrorism grants this year out of a total of $10 million allocated to not-for-profit institutions by the Department of Homeland Security.

That’s $6 million less than last year. But thanks to sharp cuts this year in the overall pool of money available through this program, the percentage of funds going to Jewish groups has nevertheless jumped substantially.

A full 97% of the available funds in the Non-Profit Security Grant Program for 2012 have been allocated to Jewish organizations, compared with 73% that went to Jewish groups from 2007 through 2010. In 2011, Jewish groups received about 80% of NSGP funds.

The NSGP has disproportionately benefited Jewish groups since 2005, when it was first instituted.

Jewish Groups Grab Huge Share of Grants

 

[irosie91]

Jewish Groups Grab Huge Share of Grants
Almost All Homeland Security Grants Go to Jewish Non-Profits

Jewish institutions throughout the United States will receive $9.7 million in federal anti-terrorism grants this year out of a total of $10 million allocated to not-for-profit institutions by the Department of Homeland Security.

That’s $6 million less than last year. But thanks to sharp cuts this year in the overall pool of money available through this program, the percentage of funds going to Jewish groups has nevertheless jumped substantially.

A full 97% of the available funds in the Non-Profit Security Grant Program for 2012 have been allocated to Jewish organizations, compared with 73% that went to Jewish groups from 2007 through 2010. In 2011, Jewish groups received about 80% of NSGP funds.

The NSGP has disproportionately benefited Jewish groups since 2005, when it was first instituted.

Jewish Groups Grab Huge Share of Grants

THE FASCIST PROPAGANDAISTS DO IT AGAIN-----the fund to which the fascist alludes is a very very very tiny part of the HOMELAND SECURITY budget-----it benefits ONLY not for profit institutions which are targets of terrorism ------the fact is that every jewish institution in the US is a target which -----and people like Jos are the reason that synagogues hire armed guards on holidays when kids are present in significant numbers-------the police departements in my town ACTUALLY REQUIRE synagogues to do so ------I was delighted last year to see that one of the armed guards was a SIKH He was very vigilant The people from PUNJAB have experience with what people like Jos are all about The episode in Wisconsin was accomplished by the very same kind of people that create the need for armed guards in synagogues I certainly hope that the sikh temples get some help. For those wondering-----the grants are extremely small for individual institution security

 

[irosie91]

I just googled THE ENTIRE BUDGET for targeted institution security ----is ten million dollars ----LOL ------which means that synagogues have to shoulder the costs virtually entirely--------even if they got the ENTIRE BUDGET Islamo nazis are really comical I have a better plan---------a billion dollar budget should be elaborated by selling mosques at public auction

 

[Jos]

This disproportionate distribution is no accident. Examining the grants program provides a window into Jewish organizational and political power. It is this power that allowed a small community to create and maintain a government program tailored specifically for its needs and catering almost exclusively to its members.

The legislation and the rules defining eligibility make no mention of preferring Jewish institutions, but in practice the program could easily be viewed as a Jewish earmark.

How Anti-Terror Program Became Jewish Earmark

 

[MJB12741]

I feel sorry for the Sikhs. So many Americans have had it with "peaceful Islam." Yet they don't understand that Sikhs are pro America, pro democracy people of good standing & not Muslims.

 

[mememe]

I feel sorry for the Sikhs. So many Americans have had it with "peaceful Islam." Yet they don't understand that Sikhs are pro America, pro democracy people of good standing & not Muslims.

Two questions:

1. How do you determine pro-Americanism of SIKHS?

2. Define "democracy".

 

[Jos]

I feel sorry for the Sikhs. So many Americans have had it with "peaceful Islam." Yet they don't understand that Sikhs are pro America, pro democracy people of good standing & not Muslims.

How Many American Muslims are not pro America, Not pro democracy and not people of good standing
Compared to how many are ?

 

[BecauseIKnow]

Sikhs are good, hard-working, pro-American people. That's why they came to the U.S. There are many in our community and they're good folks.

Unlike filthy Muslim Islamic whack jobs who come here to do us harm.

Your the filth that America doesn't need

 

[SAYIT]

this is what some of you posters remind me of when you utter these words.

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11

As Sikhs confront Wisconsin temple shooting tragedy, members of the community reflect on 11 years of 'Bin Laden' taunts and misunderstanding

Chris McGreal in Oak Creek guardian.co.uk, Monday 6 August 2012 18.38 EDT

A few days after the al-Qaida attacks more than a decade ago, a Sikh man, Balbir Singh Sodhi, was shot dead in Arizona by a man who assumed he was a Muslim. Other attacks followed and the passing of time has not diminished the false assumptions.

In April, 92 members of Congress signed a letter urging the FBI to collect information on hate crimes against Sikhs. The effort was led by a New York Congressman, Joe Crowley, who said the Sikh community "is acutely susceptible to violence because of their appearance".

Amardeep Singh, of the Sikh Coalition, said that in addressing audiences since 9/11 he usually poses a question. "When you see a turban and beard, what is the first thing you think of? The answer is inevitably what? I think of a terrorist. We've had 11 years where the turban is equated with terrorism," he said. "Is our community an intentional victim? … No, we're collateral damage."

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11 | World news | guardian.co.uk

many sikhs, in an exemplary display of grace and a deep understanding, used what to them is surely a great personal tragedy to plea for a greater understanding of all cultures, many times emphasizing the muslims in this plea. that is what sikhs are about, truly an extraordinary culture andd religion.

many of us, all of us, could learn from the example they are setting.

Tragic yet this is the Israel/"Palestine" board and this is an unrelated matter.

 

[SAYIT]

Jewish Groups Grab Huge Share of Grants
Almost All Homeland Security Grants Go to Jewish Non-Profits

Jewish institutions throughout the United States will receive $9.7 million in federal anti-terrorism grants this year out of a total of $10 million allocated to not-for-profit institutions by the Department of Homeland Security.

That’s $6 million less than last year. But thanks to sharp cuts this year in the overall pool of money available through this program, the percentage of funds going to Jewish groups has nevertheless jumped substantially.

A full 97% of the available funds in the Non-Profit Security Grant Program for 2012 have been allocated to Jewish organizations, compared with 73% that went to Jewish groups from 2007 through 2010. In 2011, Jewish groups received about 80% of NSGP funds.

The NSGP has disproportionately benefited Jewish groups since 2005, when it was first instituted.

Jewish Groups Grab Huge Share of Grants

This is the Israel/"Palestine" board and your post is unrelated.

 

[sealadaigh]

this is what some of you posters remind me of when you utter these words.

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11

As Sikhs confront Wisconsin temple shooting tragedy, members of the community reflect on 11 years of 'Bin Laden' taunts and misunderstanding

Chris McGreal in Oak Creek guardian.co.uk, Monday 6 August 2012 18.38 EDT

A few days after the al-Qaida attacks more than a decade ago, a Sikh man, Balbir Singh Sodhi, was shot dead in Arizona by a man who assumed he was a Muslim. Other attacks followed and the passing of time has not diminished the false assumptions.

In April, 92 members of Congress signed a letter urging the FBI to collect information on hate crimes against Sikhs. The effort was led by a New York Congressman, Joe Crowley, who said the Sikh community "is acutely susceptible to violence because of their appearance".

Amardeep Singh, of the Sikh Coalition, said that in addressing audiences since 9/11 he usually poses a question. "When you see a turban and beard, what is the first thing you think of? The answer is inevitably what? I think of a terrorist. We've had 11 years where the turban is equated with terrorism," he said. "Is our community an intentional victim? … No, we're collateral damage."

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11 | World news | guardian.co.uk

many sikhs, in an exemplary display of grace and a deep understanding, used what to them is surely a great personal tragedy to plea for a greater understanding of all cultures, many times emphasizing the muslims in this plea. that is what sikhs are about, truly an extraordinary culture andd religion.

many of us, all of us, could learn from the example they are setting.

Tragic yet this is the Israel/"Palestine" board and this is an unrelated matter.

you should probably consult with your friend, roudy, about that. he opened the door.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Remembering 9/11

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...ieWyBw&usg=AFQjCNFivcuMEqgreKyEO0cSBqHentXiog



And if to remember that US finances supports and fights alongside radical terrorist Muslim groups, one has to ask: if Muslim terrorists are "animals", what does it make the US?

America is fighting radical Muslims in Afghanistan, so I don't know what you're talking about.

 

[SAYIT]

Remembering 9/11

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...ieWyBw&usg=AFQjCNFivcuMEqgreKyEO0cSBqHentXiog



And if to remember that US finances supports and fights alongside radical terrorist Muslim groups, one has to ask: if Muslim terrorists are "animals", what does it make the US?

America is fighting radical Muslims in Afghanistan, so I don't know what you're talking about.

Neither does memememememe

 

[Roudy]

this is what some of you posters remind me of when you utter these words.

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11

As Sikhs confront Wisconsin temple shooting tragedy, members of the community reflect on 11 years of 'Bin Laden' taunts and misunderstanding

Chris McGreal in Oak Creek guardian.co.uk, Monday 6 August 2012 18.38 EDT

A few days after the al-Qaida attacks more than a decade ago, a Sikh man, Balbir Singh Sodhi, was shot dead in Arizona by a man who assumed he was a Muslim. Other attacks followed and the passing of time has not diminished the false assumptions.

In April, 92 members of Congress signed a letter urging the FBI to collect information on hate crimes against Sikhs. The effort was led by a New York Congressman, Joe Crowley, who said the Sikh community "is acutely susceptible to violence because of their appearance".

Amardeep Singh, of the Sikh Coalition, said that in addressing audiences since 9/11 he usually poses a question. "When you see a turban and beard, what is the first thing you think of? The answer is inevitably what? I think of a terrorist. We've had 11 years where the turban is equated with terrorism," he said. "Is our community an intentional victim? … No, we're collateral damage."

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11 | World news | guardian.co.uk

many sikhs, in an exemplary display of grace and a deep understanding, used what to them is surely a great personal tragedy to plea for a greater understanding of all cultures, many times emphasizing the muslims in this plea. that is what sikhs are about, truly an extraordinary culture andd religion.

many of us, all of us, could learn from the example they are setting.

And that has exactly what to do with Israel and Palestine?

 

[SAYIT]

Remembering 9/11

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...ieWyBw&usg=AFQjCNFivcuMEqgreKyEO0cSBqHentXiog



And if to remember that US finances supports and fights alongside radical terrorist Muslim groups, one has to ask: if Muslim terrorists are "animals", what does it make the US?

Silly attempt at moral equivalence but your hate for America has been duly noted.
It's amazing how many of the "I-hate-Israel/I-hate Joooos" crowd also hate America and Americans.
A coincidence? I think not.

 

[SAYIT]

this is what some of you posters remind me of when you utter these words.

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11

As Sikhs confront Wisconsin temple shooting tragedy, members of the community reflect on 11 years of 'Bin Laden' taunts and misunderstanding

Chris McGreal in Oak Creek guardian.co.uk, Monday 6 August 2012 18.38 EDT

A few days after the al-Qaida attacks more than a decade ago, a Sikh man, Balbir Singh Sodhi, was shot dead in Arizona by a man who assumed he was a Muslim. Other attacks followed and the passing of time has not diminished the false assumptions.

In April, 92 members of Congress signed a letter urging the FBI to collect information on hate crimes against Sikhs. The effort was led by a New York Congressman, Joe Crowley, who said the Sikh community "is acutely susceptible to violence because of their appearance".

Amardeep Singh, of the Sikh Coalition, said that in addressing audiences since 9/11 he usually poses a question. "When you see a turban and beard, what is the first thing you think of? The answer is inevitably what? I think of a terrorist. We've had 11 years where the turban is equated with terrorism," he said. "Is our community an intentional victim? … No, we're collateral damage."

Sikhs say attacks on community are 'collateral damage' of 9/11 | World news | guardian.co.uk

many sikhs, in an exemplary display of grace and a deep understanding, used what to them is surely a great personal tragedy to plea for a greater understanding of all cultures, many times emphasizing the muslims in this plea. that is what sikhs are about, truly an extraordinary culture andd religion.

many of us, all of us, could learn from the example they are setting.

Tragic, yet this is the Israel/"Palestine" board and this is an unrelated matter.

you should probably consult with your friend, roudy, about that. he opened the door.

You created the thread.