alan1
Gold Member
Irrelevant. The medium may have change, the actions did not.How long ago were the Clinton stories? Around 20 years ago, right?
Experience.
In other words, it's not "news", it's hackery regardless of your opinion.
Your biased opinion does not make it so.The truth is that there is a litany of factors that can easily and adequately explain who Cain's current scandals are receiving so much comparative attention, and Clinton's so little. The fact that you automatically cry out about bias demonstrates that you, yourself, are biased.
All that just to say "Nu-uh!" That's about all the sophistication of your response.
Yawn