Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 102,605
- 84,061
- 3,645
Nope.Do you believe the Roswell Rock, i.e. ancient aliens, then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope.Do you believe the Roswell Rock, i.e. ancient aliens, then?
Its called intelligent DNA. All living creatures are equipped with a DNA signature that allows for life to adapt to its natural surroundings. Again........with a BS example of "horizontal movement WITHIN SPECIES"? Simply because some sections of DNA is not activated, because there is no need....proves what, except INTELLIGENT DESIGN?
Do you believe the Roswell Rock, i.e. ancient aliens, then? History channel is pretty legit. I post it for the easily fooled here.
Do you have any observable evidence for aliens? Of course, not. Aliens don't exist except in sci-fi.You of course like the conspiratorial crap on Ancient Aliens.
(what happened to Genesis?)
The worst show on History or on any channel. Catering to the LCD/Lowest Common denominator conspiracy crowd.
More magic BS that is just up your BS magic alley.
No real science.
It figures.
`
No and neither do you.Do you have any observable evidence for aliens? Of course, not. Aliens don't exist except in sci-fi.
Really DNA has no purpose or intent? If Pasteur's experiment is SPCIOUS......why don't you present a single scientific experiment that does not falsify ABIOGENESIS. Of the 1000s of experiments conducted attempting to prove abiogenesis, simply present the one that affirms such a theory. Why would Pasteur waste time attempting to falsify something that has been falsified numerous times previously. Now THAT IS EMBARRASSING. Pasteur indeed attempted to allow life to grow from nothing based upon all previous theories of ABIOGENSIS. Pasteur proved that it takes life to reproduce life, and that can only be reproduced WITHIN SPECIES.DNA has no intelligence. DNA does not do anything with purpose or intent. It has no self awareness. Just because something looks fancy to you -- a person who knows next to nothing about any related topic -- doesn't prove it is "design". It merely "kinda, sorta" feels that way to you.
In fact, that's why you hate the theory of evolution" it shows that things that appear "designed:" were not designed and require no designer. So you are about 150 years behind the rest of the world.
And your use of Pasteur's experiment is specious. It does not contradict a single principle of evolution or abiogenesis. You embarrass yourself to claim it does.
Please read more slowly and try to understand ideas before commenting. This is the science section, not the Sunday revival.Really DNA has no purpose or intent?
Also not what I said. You either do not read well, or you are a dishonest troll who intentionally misrepresents people.Pasteur's experiment is SPCIOUS
DNA's has no "Intent," it's an organic chemical with no brain.Really DNA has no purpose or intent? If Pasteur's experiment is SPCIOUS......why don't you present a single scientific experiment that does not falsify ABIOGENESIS. Of the 1000s of experiments conducted attempting to prove abiogenesis, simply present the one that affirms such a theory. Why would Pasteur waste time attempting to falsify something that has been falsified numerous times previously. Now THAT IS EMBARRASSING.
First you declare that DNA has no indicators of design........when DNA design is the very purpose of DNA. Please enlighten us, show any example of life that does not have a DNA signature specific to that particular species. Just one. Even the fetus that you would sacrifice in the womb has a personal identifying DNA signature that is unique to every other life form on earth, even to that of both parents. Talk about willful ignorance.
What? How think do you stupid people to be? Don't watch your left hand behind the curtain pay no attention .......Watch the right hand and pretend that evolution is confirmed because there are examples of adaptation WITHIN SPECIES.Useless organs, even dangerous ones like Wisdom Teeth (from when we were herbivorous and lived in trees) can and have killed people.
But for the advent of Modern dentistry the human population would be gradually purged of the majority who get them.
The Coxxis/former tail also a useless remnant from when we lived in trees.
That's NOT "intelligent," it's what you'd a expect from a continuing/common descent Pile/build-up of trial and error mutations you Moron.
The rest is all useless CRAP about what others call Micro vs Macro evolution
But it's really the same ongoing continued distancing that leads to other species.
And the EVIDENCE for that is Overwhelming: fossil and otherwise.
And btw WE are not special creation, we are still evolving as is all life.
Another kweationist klown.
And this where you get reminded that every well educated person on the planet accepts evolution as a fact, unless their minds are addled by mythology. Which is a very small percentage of them. You are embarrassing yourself. Especially in light of some of the very stupid things you have said, and the very stupid behavior you have displayed.? How think do you stupid people to be?
LOFLWhat? How think do you stupid people to be? Don't watch your left hand behind the curtain pay no attention .......Watch the right hand and pretend that evolution is confirmed because there are examples of adaptation WITHIN SPECIES.
Vertical Evolution:
Horizontal Evolution:
One is truth..........the other is but a theory that cannot find the evidence required to be A LAW OF EVOLUTION.
Just show us THIS LAW. You will not because it does not exist.
Evolution between species is also a documented FACT.Again........REAL SLOW...........like you are the 5 year old you are pretending everyone else to be. Evolution within species is a FACT of science and it rests with a complete and whole DNA signature. A mutation is a DNA strain that is missing a link and is less than perfect. You can present all the examples of adaption WITHIN SPECIES you want, but you are yet to present the first example of something evolving into a totally different species.
Simply because life within species can adapt to its surroundings does not prove Darwinian Evolution from dead matter nor does it prove that one species can EVOLVE into a totally different species. A K9 will always be a k9 regardless of all subspecies of that species. Primate will always be primates. What? Are living fossils that exist today just to stupid to evolve into man? Why have not all primates evolved into humans......just the very smart one? [
Again. Show me the LAW OF EVOLUTION as confirmed via the Scientific Method. You will not........you continue to present logical fallacies because there is no such Law found in Nature. It's very simple.DNA's has no "Intent," it's an organic chemical with no brain.
It's just what life happened to start with. (it could have been QVC and maybe is 300 light years from here)
And it's not intelligent.
It's trial and error.
Better adapted ones to the evolving climate survive better, worse go EXTINCT.
Who 'designed' that?
Wat happened to Dinosaurs? Mammoths? Saber Tooth Tigers?
We have "vertical and horizontal" because of ERROR/Mutation of it.
Just keep going 'horizontal' for long enough and you will end up vertical/separate.
A smart design would be clean and simple.
No mutations, birth defects, etc no Vanishing species from 'perfect' Genesis..
The universe also Chaotic. Colliding Galaxies, exploding stars, etc (which may take billions/trillions/quadrillions of living things)
`
Again.......if evolution between species exists. Show me the Law of Evolution. You continue to present a logical fallacy and pretend that a theory is a fact of science and truth.LOFL
NO such thing Clown, unless you're reading Kweationist websites.
Evolution between species is also a documented FACT.
Dozens of Fossil creatures/Tweeners gradually changing (in our case) from Ape to more human for over 5 million years.
from "15 answers to creationist nonsense."
Scientific American
My thread of that title and link here:
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense By John Rennie - July 1, 2002 Editor-in-Chief, Scientific American https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-answers-to-creationist/ [.....] 1. Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law. Many people learned in Elementary School that...www.usmessageboard.com
"..For instance, evolution implies that between the earliest known ancestors of humans (roughly five million years old) and the appearance of anatomically modern humans (about 200,000 years ago), one should find a succession of hominin creatures with features progressively less apelike and more modern, which is indeed what the fossil record shows.But one should not—and does not—find modern human fossils embedded in strata from the Jurassic period (65 million years ago). Evolutionary biology routinely makes predictions far more refined and precise than this, and researchers test them constantly..."`
A very dumb thing to say that shows your ignorance of the entire topic of science in general, much less just evolution.Show me the LAW OF EVOLUTION as confirmed via the Scientific Method
You're a science illiterate and you could NOT answer meAgain. Show me the LAW OF EVOLUTION as confirmed via the Scientific Method. You will not........you continue to present logical fallacies because there is no such Law found in Nature. It's very simple.
Genesis is an impossible fairy tale and there's No DNA. No dinosaurs, nothing.And your ignorance of scripture is quite amusing.
Indeed trail and error mutations. Mutations are smart and intelligent but DNA is random. LMAO Show us an example of a mutated life that has been made complete and whole again.....adding back to the corrupted DNA.....demonstrate your TRAIL and ERROR, Oops! I (a mutation) made a mistake by trail, lets start all over again. Once a DNA is corrupted, its corrupted and incomplete, there is no TRAIL PERIOD. You can't demonstrate that......DNA gains new information with mutation, it never gains information.....it becomes imperfect, not whole, not complete because there was a break in a link.Useless organs, even dangerous ones like Wisdom Teeth (from when we were herbivorous and lived in trees) can and have killed people.
But for the advent of Modern dentistry the human population would be gradually purged of the majority who get them.
The Coxxis/former tail also a useless remnant from when we lived in trees.
That's NOT "intelligent," it's what you'd a expect from a continuing/common descent Pile/build-up of trial and error mutations you Moron.
The rest is all useless CRAP about what others call Micro vs Macro evolution
But it's really the same ongoing continued distancing that leads to other species.
And the EVIDENCE for that is Overwhelming: fossil and otherwise.
And btw WE are not special creation, we are still evolving as is all life.
Another kweationist klown.
`
We know there are no aliens. The crop circle design on the small smooth rock makes it appear hokey. What was interesting was the rock was magnetic and I think the show proved it was a rock and not something made to look like one.Nope.
Please read more slowly and try to understand ideas before commenting. This is the science section, not the Sunday revival.
I said DNA does nothing with purpose or intent. Any more so than does a water molecule.
Following?
Also not what I said. You either do not read well, or you are a dishonest troll who intentionally misrepresents people.
Go back, re-read, maybe attempt some comments that are both coherent and relevant to the comments to which you are responding. Or stick to the Rubber Room
If you repeat something over and over it becomes a LAW of PHSICS? You have presented NO LAW OF EVOLUTION. You present PSEUDO SCIENCE that exists only as assumption, speculation and conjecture....i.e, You present philosophy and pretend its applied science. If this is the science section. Show me the LAW that makes it applied science, that which can be quantified via potential or observed empirically while being reproducible and constant.
LYING response.Indeed trail and error mutations. Mutations are smart and intelligent but DNA is random. LMAO Show us an example of a mutated life that has been made complete and whole again.....adding back to the corrupted DNA.....demonstrate your TRAIL and ERROR, Oops! I (a mutation) made a mistake by trail, lets start all over again. Once a DNA is corrupted, its corrupted and incomplete, there is no TRAIL PERIOD. You can't demonstrate that......DNA gains new information with mutation, it never gains information.....it becomes imperfect, not whole, not complete because there was a break in a link.[/quopte]
I already explained it with a 100% Response from an impeccable source.I am still awaiting for you to present the LAW OF EVOLUTION. Science works with FACTS..........if there are no facts present there can be no LAWS. There is quite a bit of difference between APPLIED SCIENCE and THEORETICAL SCIENCE. One is based upon facts and quantifiable potential........the other is nothing but a philosophy pretending to be SCIENCE, its pseudo in nature, it exists only between the ears of someone, the reason you can't show us the LAW OF EVOLUTION.......you have presented nothing but speculation, assumption, conjecture based upon observing that which exists today while projecting the reality that exists today as a constant over the past eons void of having the empirical evidence to make those conjectures, assumptions, and speculations FACTS of SCIENCE. There is no such animal as the Law of Evolution.
If you repeat something over and over it becomes a LAW of PHSICS?