More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

[PMZ]

The conservative compulsion to return us to the 50s, big cars, racism, pollution, race riots, KKK cross burnings, polio, barefoot and pregnant woman, all of the trimmings, is not only undesirable but unattainable.

Does either wake them up to reality?

Not a chance. There's is a dream world in which they are, once again, relevant in and to America. It, thank God, is over, never to infect American culture again.

They are now trying to lead from the rear. Trying to drag us back to what we already ended.

Thank God we have the vote to extinguish the hoard forever.

Gallup poll: Conservatives outnumber liberals

Conservatives continue to make up the largest segment of political views in the country, outnumbering liberals nearly two-to-one, according to a new poll Thursday.

The Gallup survey found that 40 percent of Americans consider themselves conservative; 35 percent consider themselves moderate; and 21 percent see themselves as liberal. The figures did not change from 2010.


Read more: Gallup poll: Conservatives outnumber liberals - Tim Mak - POLITICO.com

56 to 40. Seems right to me.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You have to be an idiot to believe that you in a big car, hitting a small car, is safer for the small car passengers, than getting in the same collision with another small car.

And to think that you are entitled to any share of the world's oil reserves that you want.

And to think that there is no limit to how much destructive waste you can dump into the one atmosphere the world will ever have.

No wonder that you have to deny science to obscure your screw you attitude.

So what's your next idea, ban big cars?

I know you hate the statistics that show your ideas kill people, but that's the case.

As the oil that you are so big on taking more than your share of runs out, big cars will be seen as huge waste that they have, in reality, always been. Huge, guzzling monuments to waste. People will be embarrassed to be seen in them. They will be nothing but evidence of conspicuous consumption and will be laughed out of town.

As the oil that you are so big on taking more than your share of runs out, big cars will be seen as huge waste that they have

You want to let the market work? That's not very liberal of you.

Come on, admit it, you want to ban large cars. What about trucks? Ban them too?

 

[PMZ]

So what's your next idea, ban big cars?

I know you hate the statistics that show your ideas kill people, but that's the case.

As the oil that you are so big on taking more than your share of runs out, big cars will be seen as huge waste that they have, in reality, always been. Huge, guzzling monuments to waste. People will be embarrassed to be seen in them. They will be nothing but evidence of conspicuous consumption and will be laughed out of town.

As the oil that you are so big on taking more than your share of runs out, big cars will be seen as huge waste that they have

You want to let the market work? That's not very liberal of you.

Come on, admit it, you want to ban large cars. What about trucks? Ban them too?

Read again. I said the market will take care of the problem.

 

[PMZ]

Conservatives pretend to like free markets. Part of that fantasy is that people freely chose gas guzzlers. Why do they? Only one possible answer. Advertising. Further proof that there are no free markets today. They're all manipulated markets. ''Buying a big car is better than Viagra for your sex life.''

Right.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As the oil that you are so big on taking more than your share of runs out, big cars will be seen as huge waste that they have, in reality, always been. Huge, guzzling monuments to waste. People will be embarrassed to be seen in them. They will be nothing but evidence of conspicuous consumption and will be laughed out of town.

As the oil that you are so big on taking more than your share of runs out, big cars will be seen as huge waste that they have

You want to let the market work? That's not very liberal of you.

Come on, admit it, you want to ban large cars. What about trucks? Ban them too?

Read again. I said the market will take care of the problem.

Excellent! We can repeal CAFE standards, the market will take care of the problem.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Conservatives pretend to like free markets. Part of that fantasy is that people freely chose gas guzzlers. Why do they? Only one possible answer. Advertising. Further proof that there are no free markets today. They're all manipulated markets. ''Buying a big car is better than Viagra for your sex life.''

Right.

Why do they? Only one possible answer. Advertising.

All those sheep, buying the wrong things, because of advertising.
It's a good thing we have all you selfless liberals, here to straighten out the sheep.

 

[PMZ]

As the oil that you are so big on taking more than your share of runs out, big cars will be seen as huge waste that they have

You want to let the market work? That's not very liberal of you.

Come on, admit it, you want to ban large cars. What about trucks? Ban them too?

Read again. I said the market will take care of the problem.

Excellent! We can repeal CAFE standards, the market will take care of the problem.

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

When you get the Republican Party to stop 24/7/365 campaigning on Fox and friends, we can talk.

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress so the we, the people are more powerful than ''make more money regardless of the cost to others.

 

[PMZ]

Conservatives pretend to like free markets. Part of that fantasy is that people freely chose gas guzzlers. Why do they? Only one possible answer. Advertising. Further proof that there are no free markets today. They're all manipulated markets. ''Buying a big car is better than Viagra for your sex life.''

Right.

Why do they? Only one possible answer. Advertising.

All those sheep, buying the wrong things, because of advertising.
It's a good thing we have all you selfless liberals, here to straighten out the sheep.

Replace ''selfless'' with ''responsible'' and this will be your first intelligent post.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Read again. I said the market will take care of the problem.

Excellent! We can repeal CAFE standards, the market will take care of the problem.

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

When you get the Republican Party to stop 24/7/365 campaigning on Fox and friends, we can talk.

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress so the we, the people are more powerful than ''make more money regardless of the cost to others.

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

Free speech? Too dangerous, eh comrade?

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress

When your liberal force for progress is also ignorant and gullible, we have a problem.

 

[PMZ]

Excellent! We can repeal CAFE standards, the market will take care of the problem.

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

When you get the Republican Party to stop 24/7/365 campaigning on Fox and friends, we can talk.

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress so the we, the people are more powerful than ''make more money regardless of the cost to others.

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

Free speech? Too dangerous, eh comrade?

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress

When your liberal force for progress is also ignorant and gullible, we have a problem.

That’s true. That's why we're so focused on science. To prevent that.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

When you get the Republican Party to stop 24/7/365 campaigning on Fox and friends, we can talk.

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress so the we, the people are more powerful than ''make more money regardless of the cost to others.

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

Free speech? Too dangerous, eh comrade?

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress

When your liberal force for progress is also ignorant and gullible, we have a problem.

That’s true. That's why we're so focused on science. To prevent that.

That's why thousands more have to die each year? Because you're focused on science?

 

[mamooth]

But the smaller cars are _saving_ lives, as the stats show. You, todd, are demanding butchery solely for the glory of your political cult. Your anti-science hysteria kills people. How do you manage sleep at night, given how much blood is on your hands?

 

[PMZ]

When you get the auto industry to repeal advertising, we can talk.

Free speech? Too dangerous, eh comrade?

As long as there are the ignorant and gullible, we'll need a force for progress

When your liberal force for progress is also ignorant and gullible, we have a problem.

That’s true. That's why we're so focused on science. To prevent that.

That's why thousands more have to die each year? Because you're focused on science?

Next you're going to pretend that auto manufacturers voluntarily came up with seat belts, air bags, collapsible steering columns, etc.

And you just can't get over the myth that you with a more lethal weapon increases our safety. You must have been instructed to sell that BS by the NRA.

 

[PMZ]

But the smaller cars are _saving_ lives, as the stats show. You, todd, are demanding butchery solely for the glory of your political cult. Your anti-science hysteria kills people. How do you manage sleep at night, given how much blood is on your hands?

It's tough for people like Todd to defend their indefensible position. They have to grab at what they can and hope that nobody gives it any more thought than they gave their politics.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

But the smaller cars are _saving_ lives, as the stats show. You, todd, are demanding butchery solely for the glory of your political cult. Your anti-science hysteria kills people. How do you manage sleep at night, given how much blood is on your hands?

The stats show the CAFE standards cost serveral thousand additional lives each year.

I sleep very well in my opposition to CAFE standards.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That’s true. That's why we're so focused on science. To prevent that.

That's why thousands more have to die each year? Because you're focused on science?

Next you're going to pretend that auto manufacturers voluntarily came up with seat belts, air bags, collapsible steering columns, etc.

And you just can't get over the myth that you with a more lethal weapon increases our safety. You must have been instructed to sell that BS by the NRA.

Next you're going to pretend that auto manufacturers voluntarily came up with seat belts, air bags, collapsible steering columns, etc

Now lets examine the difference between life saving safety devices and CAFE standards that kill several thousand people each year.

 

[westwall]

But the smaller cars are _saving_ lives, as the stats show. You, todd, are demanding butchery solely for the glory of your political cult. Your anti-science hysteria kills people. How do you manage sleep at night, given how much blood is on your hands?

-




What "stats" are those admiral? Do present some links so we can check for ourselves. Here is what I found...

"The bad news is that smaller, lighter cars are generally not as safe as larger, heavier cars. Large vehicles have longer hoods and bigger crush zones, which gives them an advantage in frontal crashes.

In studies conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), a heavier vehicle will typically push a lighter one backward during the impact. As a result, there will be less force on the occupants of the heavier vehicle and more on those in the lighter vehicle, according to IIHS."

Are Small Cars Safe? Edmunds.com



"The results? Physics wins. This is something we mention here on KickingTires and on Cars.com whenever crash-test results like this come out. Crash tests can generally only predict how well a car or SUV does within its class or competitive makeup, not against other types of vehicles. The exception is IIHS’ side-impact tests, which simulate impacts with SUVs for every vehicle.

What these fresh results from IIHS spell out is that in a frontal collision, physics dictate that the larger vehicle in the test will fare better than the smaller one. Force is distributed unevenly, making the small car lose out in any matchup versus a larger car.

Crash statistics prove this to some degree. In 2007, small-car crashes resulted in a 17% higher fatality rate than midsize-car crashes."

Study: Small Cars at Greater Risk in Accidents - KickingTires


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu95gB04VC4]MINICARS MICROCARS CRASH TEST FAIL CAR CARS AUTOS - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHuHpRuhX0o]Half of Small Cars Score Badly on Tougher U.S. Crash Tests - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pVF1Wr7GLQ]Crashtest Audi Q7 vs. Fiat 500 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[mamooth]

What "stats" are those admiral? Do present some links so we can check for ourselves.

Already did. Traffic-related death rates in the UK, land of the minicars, are less than half that of the USA, land of the monster cars.

List of countries by traffic-related death rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All you've done is tell us what we already knew, that big cars crush smaller cars. You've ignored the effects of what happens when all the cars are smaller, which is what the USA-UK comparison shows. If your theory was right, the UK should have the higher death rates, but instead we see the exact opposite.

 

[skookerasbil]

more k00k losing >>>>


CBS News reports that temperatures to rise 212 degrees!!!


Networks Embrace ?Catastrophic? Warnings of Latest IPCC Report | Media Research Center


You can get mega-bomb throwing shit almost every day!!! The mental cases cant help themselves anymore......like they collectively decided, "We're losing big so we have to get even more absurd!!"

 

[skookerasbil]

What "stats" are those admiral? Do present some links so we can check for ourselves.

Already did. Traffic-related death rates in the UK, land of the minicars, are less than half that of the USA, land of the monster cars.

List of countries by traffic-related death rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All you've done is tell us what we already knew, that big cars crush smaller cars. You've ignored the effects of what happens when all the cars are smaller, which is what the USA-UK comparison shows. If your theory was right, the UK should have the higher death rates, but instead we see the exact opposite.

and land of the non-gay cars!!! That are fast as shit.......like mine!!!






At least 95 out of 100 American males wouldn't be caught dead driving one of those gay 2 door hybrid SPECKS. Just a fact of life.