More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nutters have more sand for burying heads in Tejas.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ_VuGZw3cY

Not surprised the discussion is about EVERYTHING but the science. Talk religion, politics, Civil War, whatever you need to DISCREDIT your opposition.. Sad fact is -- it's because most Enviro-nuts know little about GW or the Environment..

I am going to say this one more time.

I am not an environmentalist. I am a dude with a family and a substantial carbon footprint.

However....I can grasp the science. I can understand and accept the facts.

We are shitting in our own nest. It takes an idiot of monumental proportions to deny that our unending thirst for fuel and other resources is fucking up the planet.

Being a regular guy.....with a regular family.....I am not excited about being inconvenienced or taxed in order to help solve the problem. But I can at least accept that the problem exists.

You fucking idiots.


regular fAiL s0n!! Hyperpartisan k00ks pushing this agenda are human racists.


Sine you already throw down a significant carbon footprint, how 'bout you fund the whole 76 trillion to go green!!:D:D:up:


Meanwhile, we idiots will enjoy the continual victories!! And anybody who thinks this shit is man-made long ago got duped and is hopelessly mired in the matrix.
 
Last edited:
more k00k losing.......


And, if truth be told, we have evidence that the Carbon Tracker Initiative doesn’t believe that there will be those effective limits either. If they did they could just sit there and watch all those filthy capitalist fossil fuel barons lose all their money. No doubt to the great enjoyment of the people at the CTI. That they’re making a song and dance about it now is, or could be, evidence that they’re not all that sure themselves that the limits will be imposed in a manner that works and so they’d better expend their efforts on some other manner of achieving the same goal. The very existence of this campaign is evidence that they don’t think that hard caps on the usage of fossil fuels will ever be imposed.[/SIZE]



The Oil Industry Is Not Risking $1.1 Trillion Of Investor's Cash - Forbes
 
Last edited:
LOL....why "climate science" is a joke >>>


RIP Climate Science: It Is Time For Climate Politics - Forbes


If the AGW crowd ever hopes to not lose, they need to not be doing this same stoopid-ass song and dance theyve been doing for over 20 years and not moving the goalposts a single yard. As Krauthammer said yesterday.....its like these people do the perpetual Indian rain dance!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance::funnyface::funnyface:
 
LOL....why "climate science" is a joke >>>


RIP Climate Science: It Is Time For Climate Politics - Forbes


If the AGW crowd ever hopes to not lose, they need to not be doing this same stoopid-ass song and dance theyve been doing for over 20 years and not moving the goalposts a single yard. As Krauthammer said yesterday.....its like these people do the perpetual Indian rain dance!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance::funnyface::funnyface:

Even the great unwashed grow tired of hearing loons cry wolf at some point....the steadily dropping number of people who consider climate to be an issue worth wasting their time on is a clear indication of that.
 
Well......well.......what have we here this morning on the DRUDGE REORT???

The TOP headline is??

GLOBAL WARMING SCIENTISTS COVERED UP SCEPTIC'S 'DAMAGING' REVIEW

In an echo of the infamous “Climategate” scandal at the University of East Anglia, one of the world’s top academic journals rejected the work of five experts after a reviewer privately denounced it as “harmful”.



The headline speaks for itself.......these phonies.......these climate frauds have been fucking with the data for 2 decades for the purpose of duping the public.

Ive seen posts in this forum about "real scientists".


This is what it has always been..........junk science!!!:D:D:D
 
Last edited:
There are many trying to post environmental events saying they are interested in them, yet when they post articles of those events they are from far left blog sites that try and link those events to their religion.
 
Another in the multitude of links posted up in this thread clearly showing that the AGW climate greens are losing big...............

From Gallup this week.........a poll on what problems are important to Americans!!!

Guess where global warming stands?


How about......next to dead last!!!:2up:


Jobs, Government, and Economy Remain Top U.S. Problems


Who cares about climate change?


1 The msm

2 Hollywood

3 Science geeks

4 Far left uber-progressives.

5 People without a life compass looking for a "cause" to get behind.

6 Mental cases







But nobody else.:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::coffee:
 
AGWCult,at noon today to counteract the effect of Global Climate Disruption Change, remember to hop up and down on planet Earth to move it further from the Sun
 
w0w......how embarrassing is this for the global warming crusaders??

CNN boss says there is no interest in climate change stories!!>>>

CNN Boss Zucker: 'Tremendous' Lack of Interest in Our Climate Change Stories



Dang.......can the plight of these morons get any worse?? In just the past week, we have three kicks in the balls of the climate crusading nuts.

1) Climategate II breaks

2) Gallup Poll shows that climate change is second to last on list of concerns for Americans.

3) Story above....from CNN = nobody cares about climate change.
 
MASSIVE increase in coal since 2010 >>>

IEA: Coal use is spiking climate mitigation costs | EurActiv


:DBaaaah booooom oooooooo!!!!:D

Good!:D

Two degrees window

The new report outlines three scenarios involving global warming of 2 degrees, 4 degrees and 6 degrees, indicating how the world’s energy system might be affected by each.

Underlying this analysis is an estimate by the agency – which employs the world’s most respected energy economists – that the window for a 2 degrees-warmed world will close at the end of 2016, due to the fossil fuel investments which will have been locked into future systems by then.

Gagné was quick to point out that this did not mean that a dangerously unstable future climate would then become inevitable. “It just means that once the window of opportunity is closed in terms of current infrastructure, that the discussions will have to look at retiring existing infrastructure early, and the cost of that,” he said.

To keep climate change within the 2 degrees paradigm, the IEA assumes a global carbon price of €90 a tonne by 2030, rising to around €150 a tonne by 2050.
 
Last edited:
I think this debate on AWG misses the main issue : pollution.
Going green isn't only about AGW it is a stance against pollution.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top