More BS Global Warming from MSM

[Weatherman2020]

When you read a science report claiming that 2016 was the hottest year on record, you might expect that you will get numbers. And you would be wrong.

"Note to the New York Times: ‘trouncing’ and ‘blown past’ are phrases appropriate to sports reporting, not science reporting. Except that no sports reporter would dare write an article in which he never bothers to give you the score of the big game. . . . It’s almost like they’re hiding something. And that is indeed what we find.”

TLDR: Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Moron, the only bs I see is your denier cult saying that all science is bs. Please go kindly fuck yourself!

 

[mamooth]

TLDR: Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit.

So, in other words, you don't understand statistics, and neither did that article writer. And everyone who does understand statistics sees that clearly. You were conned again.

Remember, the planet doesn't care if your religion states that's there's no warming. It's going to keep warming whether you believe or not.

 

[Weatherman2020]

TLDR: Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit.

So, in other words, you don't understand statistics, and neither did that article writer. And everyone who does understand statistics sees that clearly. You were conned again.

Remember, the planet doesn't care if your religion states that's there's no warming. It's going to keep warming whether you believe or not.

Other than spending most of my career in statistics I know little.

Do explain.

I know you can't.

 

[mamooth]

Other than spending most of my career in statistics I know little.

Then you have no excuse for sucking so badly at it.

Do explain.

You don't know what a margin of error means.

I know you can't.

And yet I just did.

Before we go further, you need to expand in detail upon your interesting "Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit." theory. I need to pin you down now on exactly what you're saying, so you can't weasel away later.

 

[Muhammed]

TLDR: Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit.

So, in other words, you don't understand statistics, and neither did that article writer. And everyone who does understand statistics sees that clearly. You were conned again.

Actually it was a very brilliant statistician who debunked the MBH hockey stick.

It's you who have been conned. It can happen to anyone. I believed CAGW bullshit at first too. However, it takes a reasonable person who doesn't have a super fragile ego to admit to themselves that they've been conned. The scientific papers are probably too technical for someone like you to comprehend, however after wikileaks released the climategate emails everyone who believed the CAGW bullshit should have realized that they were conned.

I think you have been indoctrinated into Al Gore's doomsday cult.

 

[Old Rocks]

Here is plenty of numbers.

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

 

[Wuwei]

Other than spending most of my career in statistics I know little.

Do explain.

I know you can't.

Have you ever heard of Gaussian statistics, and the central limit theorem?

 

[Old Rocks]

TLDR: Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit.

So, in other words, you don't understand statistics, and neither did that article writer. And everyone who does understand statistics sees that clearly. You were conned again.

Actually it was a very brilliant statistician who debunked the MBH hockey stick.

It's you who have been conned. It can happen to anyone. I believed CAGW bullshit at first too. However, it takes a reasonable person who doesn't have a super fragile ego to admit to themselves that they've been conned. The scientific papers are probably too technical for someone like you to comprehend, however after wikileaks released the climategate emails everyone who believed the CAGW bullshit should have realized that they were conned.

I think you have been indoctrinated into Al Gore's doomsday cult.

Dumb ass, the hockey stick has been confirmed more than a dozen times. Just the latest;

Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia

• PAGES 2k Consortium

• Affiliations
• Contributions
• Corresponding author

Nature Geoscience

6,

339–346

(2013)

doi:10.1038/ngeo1797
Received

09 December 2012
Accepted

11 March 2013
Published online

21 April 2013
Corrected online

26 April 2013

Corrected online

14 May 2013

Corrected online

27 November 2015

• Erratum (June, 2013)
• Erratum (June, 2013)
• Corrigendum (December, 2015)

Abstract

• Abstract•
• Change history•
• References•
• Author information•
• Supplementary information

Past global climate changes had strong regional expression. To elucidate their spatio-temporal pattern, we reconstructed past temperatures for seven continental-scale regions during the past one to two millennia. The most coherent feature in nearly all of the regional temperature reconstructions is a long-term cooling trend, which ended late in the nineteenth century. At multi-decadal to centennial scales, temperature variability shows distinctly different regional patterns, with more similarity within each hemisphere than between them. There were no globally synchronous multi-decadal warm or cold intervals that define a worldwide Medieval Warm Period or Little Ice Age, but all reconstructions show generally cold conditions between AD 1580 and 1880, punctuated in some regions by warm decades during the eighteenth century. The transition to these colder conditions occurred earlier in the Arctic, Europe and Asia than in North America or the Southern Hemisphere regions. Recent warming reversed the long-term cooling; during the period AD 1971–2000, the area-weighted average reconstructed temperature was higher than any other time in nearly 1,400 years.

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n5/full/ngeo1797.html

 

[Old Rocks]

Extreme weather such as heat waves, heavy downpours and droughts are expected to accompanying climate change. Recent research indicates this has begun happening.
Credit: Dreamstime


Anne-Marie Blackburn, an expert on environmental policy, and Dana Nuccitelli, an environmental scientist at a private environmental consulting firm in the Sacramento, Calif., area, are contributors to Skeptical Science. They contributed this article to LiveScience's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.

The National Hockey League playoffs are right around the corner, and the first round could feature some big rivalry matchups, like a New York/Boston series, and a Canadian battle between Montreal and Toronto. But, an arguably bigger rivalry has just been settled: climate "skeptics" versus "the hockey stick."

In 1999, climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes published one of the first studies reconstructing northern hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. They found that temperatures had been relatively flat, but slightly cooling over the past millennium up until the 20th century, at which point there was a rapid global warming. Their temperature reconstruction graph had the shape of a stick and blade, and "the hockey stick" was born.

Ever since, the hockey stick model has been one of the main targets of climate skeptics. After all, if the current global warming is unprecedented in the past 1,000 years, that would signal the need to do something to reverse it. The scientists involved have been under constant attack, as Mann documented in his book "The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars."

However, a string of subsequent studies by a number of scientific groups from around the world have all yielded essentially the same result. Most recently, a paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week — co-authored by 78 experts from 60 scientific institutions from around the world — found yet another hockey stick. Their temperature reconstruction shows a slow slide into a future ice age ending abruptly with a sharp rise in temperatures in the 19th and 20th centuries. Recent global surface temperatures are probably the warmest in the past 1,400 years.

The study is the product of an international collaboration by the PAGES (Past Global Changes) scientific network, which supports research aimed at understanding the Earth's past environment in order to make predictions for the future. In 2006, scientists in the PAGES network decided to organize an initiative to reconstruct the climate of the last 2,000 years, which they called The PAGES 2k Network.

Scientists from regions around the world each contributed their expertise on past, local climate change. This expertise is based on a solid understanding of historical records and natural measurements such as tree-ring widths and ice cores. The result is a global surface temperature reconstruction based on 511 records in seven continent-scale regions, representing the best available data for each region.

The authors looked at temperature changes over different timescales. They found a long-term cooling trend over the past 1,000 or 2,000 years up until the past century, when ongoing warming begins. With the exception of Antarctica, the end of the 20th century was either the warmest or nearly warmest in all continental regions.

Current temperatures averaged four-tenths of a degree Celsius warmer than average for the past 500 years. Recent warming has been about twice as fast in the Northern Hemisphere as in the Southern Hemisphere. This is because the southern hemisphere contains more oceans, which warm more slowly than do the land masses. The fastest warming was seen in the Arctic, at nearly twice as fast as the rest of the northern hemisphere. [Oceans Are Feeling the Heat: Op-Ed]

Earth's Temp is Rising Fast | Climate Weather

Reality.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Moron, the only bs I see is your denier cult saying that all science is bs. Please go kindly fuck yourself!

Time for you to go to Costco for another 5 gallon drum of Preparation H for that butt hurt.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Extreme weather such as heat waves, heavy downpours and droughts are expected to accompanying climate change. Recent research indicates this has begun happening.
Credit: Dreamstime


Anne-Marie Blackburn, an expert on environmental policy, and Dana Nuccitelli, an environmental scientist at a private environmental consulting firm in the Sacramento, Calif., area, are contributors to Skeptical Science. They contributed this article to LiveScience's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.

The National Hockey League playoffs are right around the corner, and the first round could feature some big rivalry matchups, like a New York/Boston series, and a Canadian battle between Montreal and Toronto. But, an arguably bigger rivalry has just been settled: climate "skeptics" versus "the hockey stick."

In 1999, climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes published one of the first studies reconstructing northern hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. They found that temperatures had been relatively flat, but slightly cooling over the past millennium up until the 20th century, at which point there was a rapid global warming. Their temperature reconstruction graph had the shape of a stick and blade, and "the hockey stick" was born.

Ever since, the hockey stick model has been one of the main targets of climate skeptics. After all, if the current global warming is unprecedented in the past 1,000 years, that would signal the need to do something to reverse it. The scientists involved have been under constant attack, as Mann documented in his book "The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars."

However, a string of subsequent studies by a number of scientific groups from around the world have all yielded essentially the same result. Most recently, a paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week — co-authored by 78 experts from 60 scientific institutions from around the world — found yet another hockey stick. Their temperature reconstruction shows a slow slide into a future ice age ending abruptly with a sharp rise in temperatures in the 19th and 20th centuries. Recent global surface temperatures are probably the warmest in the past 1,400 years.

The study is the product of an international collaboration by the PAGES (Past Global Changes) scientific network, which supports research aimed at understanding the Earth's past environment in order to make predictions for the future. In 2006, scientists in the PAGES network decided to organize an initiative to reconstruct the climate of the last 2,000 years, which they called The PAGES 2k Network.

Scientists from regions around the world each contributed their expertise on past, local climate change. This expertise is based on a solid understanding of historical records and natural measurements such as tree-ring widths and ice cores. The result is a global surface temperature reconstruction based on 511 records in seven continent-scale regions, representing the best available data for each region.

The authors looked at temperature changes over different timescales. They found a long-term cooling trend over the past 1,000 or 2,000 years up until the past century, when ongoing warming begins. With the exception of Antarctica, the end of the 20th century was either the warmest or nearly warmest in all continental regions.

Current temperatures averaged four-tenths of a degree Celsius warmer than average for the past 500 years. Recent warming has been about twice as fast in the Northern Hemisphere as in the Southern Hemisphere. This is because the southern hemisphere contains more oceans, which warm more slowly than do the land masses. The fastest warming was seen in the Arctic, at nearly twice as fast as the rest of the northern hemisphere. [Oceans Are Feeling the Heat: Op-Ed]

Earth's Temp is Rising Fast | Climate Weather

Reality.

What does any of that have to do with the NY Times not informing its readers that the rise is one hundredth of a degree with an error of a tenth of a degree?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Other than spending most of my career in statistics I know little.

Then you have no excuse for sucking so badly at it.

Do explain.

You don't know what a margin of error means.

I know you can't.

And yet I just did.

Before we go further, you need to expand in detail upon your interesting "Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit." theory. I need to pin you down now on exactly what you're saying, so you can't weasel away later.

Dufus thinks that's an explanation.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Moron, the only bs I see is your denier cult saying that all science is bs. Please go kindly fuck yourself!

SO an idiot like you thinks a 6 in 10 chance of it being warmer makes 100% proof of AGW... You need to quit fucking yourself, its making you not only look stupid but proving it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Extreme weather such as heat waves, heavy downpours and droughts are expected to accompanying climate change. Recent research indicates this has begun happening.
Credit: Dreamstime


Anne-Marie Blackburn, an expert on environmental policy, and Dana Nuccitelli, an environmental scientist at a private environmental consulting firm in the Sacramento, Calif., area, are contributors to Skeptical Science. They contributed this article to LiveScience's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.

The National Hockey League playoffs are right around the corner, and the first round could feature some big rivalry matchups, like a New York/Boston series, and a Canadian battle between Montreal and Toronto. But, an arguably bigger rivalry has just been settled: climate "skeptics" versus "the hockey stick."

In 1999, climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes published one of the first studies reconstructing northern hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. They found that temperatures had been relatively flat, but slightly cooling over the past millennium up until the 20th century, at which point there was a rapid global warming. Their temperature reconstruction graph had the shape of a stick and blade, and "the hockey stick" was born.

Ever since, the hockey stick model has been one of the main targets of climate skeptics. After all, if the current global warming is unprecedented in the past 1,000 years, that would signal the need to do something to reverse it. The scientists involved have been under constant attack, as Mann documented in his book "The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars."

However, a string of subsequent studies by a number of scientific groups from around the world have all yielded essentially the same result. Most recently, a paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week — co-authored by 78 experts from 60 scientific institutions from around the world — found yet another hockey stick. Their temperature reconstruction shows a slow slide into a future ice age ending abruptly with a sharp rise in temperatures in the 19th and 20th centuries. Recent global surface temperatures are probably the warmest in the past 1,400 years.

The study is the product of an international collaboration by the PAGES (Past Global Changes) scientific network, which supports research aimed at understanding the Earth's past environment in order to make predictions for the future. In 2006, scientists in the PAGES network decided to organize an initiative to reconstruct the climate of the last 2,000 years, which they called The PAGES 2k Network.

Scientists from regions around the world each contributed their expertise on past, local climate change. This expertise is based on a solid understanding of historical records and natural measurements such as tree-ring widths and ice cores. The result is a global surface temperature reconstruction based on 511 records in seven continent-scale regions, representing the best available data for each region.

The authors looked at temperature changes over different timescales. They found a long-term cooling trend over the past 1,000 or 2,000 years up until the past century, when ongoing warming begins. With the exception of Antarctica, the end of the 20th century was either the warmest or nearly warmest in all continental regions.

Current temperatures averaged four-tenths of a degree Celsius warmer than average for the past 500 years. Recent warming has been about twice as fast in the Northern Hemisphere as in the Southern Hemisphere. This is because the southern hemisphere contains more oceans, which warm more slowly than do the land masses. The fastest warming was seen in the Arctic, at nearly twice as fast as the rest of the northern hemisphere. [Oceans Are Feeling the Heat: Op-Ed]

Earth's Temp is Rising Fast | Climate Weather

Reality.

What does any of that have to do with the NY Times not informing its readers that the rise is one hundredth of a degree with an error of a tenth of a degree?

Informing people of the truth goes against their agenda and narrative. Telling people they don't have the data to support their contention would be admission of outright lying.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Extreme weather such as heat waves, heavy downpours and droughts are expected to accompanying climate change. Recent research indicates this has begun happening.
Credit: Dreamstime


Anne-Marie Blackburn, an expert on environmental policy, and Dana Nuccitelli, an environmental scientist at a private environmental consulting firm in the Sacramento, Calif., area, are contributors to Skeptical Science. They contributed this article to LiveScience's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.

The National Hockey League playoffs are right around the corner, and the first round could feature some big rivalry matchups, like a New York/Boston series, and a Canadian battle between Montreal and Toronto. But, an arguably bigger rivalry has just been settled: climate "skeptics" versus "the hockey stick."

In 1999, climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes published one of the first studies reconstructing northern hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. They found that temperatures had been relatively flat, but slightly cooling over the past millennium up until the 20th century, at which point there was a rapid global warming. Their temperature reconstruction graph had the shape of a stick and blade, and "the hockey stick" was born.

Ever since, the hockey stick model has been one of the main targets of climate skeptics. After all, if the current global warming is unprecedented in the past 1,000 years, that would signal the need to do something to reverse it. The scientists involved have been under constant attack, as Mann documented in his book "The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars."

However, a string of subsequent studies by a number of scientific groups from around the world have all yielded essentially the same result. Most recently, a paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week — co-authored by 78 experts from 60 scientific institutions from around the world — found yet another hockey stick. Their temperature reconstruction shows a slow slide into a future ice age ending abruptly with a sharp rise in temperatures in the 19th and 20th centuries. Recent global surface temperatures are probably the warmest in the past 1,400 years.

The study is the product of an international collaboration by the PAGES (Past Global Changes) scientific network, which supports research aimed at understanding the Earth's past environment in order to make predictions for the future. In 2006, scientists in the PAGES network decided to organize an initiative to reconstruct the climate of the last 2,000 years, which they called The PAGES 2k Network.

Scientists from regions around the world each contributed their expertise on past, local climate change. This expertise is based on a solid understanding of historical records and natural measurements such as tree-ring widths and ice cores. The result is a global surface temperature reconstruction based on 511 records in seven continent-scale regions, representing the best available data for each region.

The authors looked at temperature changes over different timescales. They found a long-term cooling trend over the past 1,000 or 2,000 years up until the past century, when ongoing warming begins. With the exception of Antarctica, the end of the 20th century was either the warmest or nearly warmest in all continental regions.

Current temperatures averaged four-tenths of a degree Celsius warmer than average for the past 500 years. Recent warming has been about twice as fast in the Northern Hemisphere as in the Southern Hemisphere. This is because the southern hemisphere contains more oceans, which warm more slowly than do the land masses. The fastest warming was seen in the Arctic, at nearly twice as fast as the rest of the northern hemisphere. [Oceans Are Feeling the Heat: Op-Ed]

Earth's Temp is Rising Fast | Climate Weather

Reality.

Death Valley used to be a lake.
Yosemite valley used to be a glacier.
Great Lakes used to be a sheet of ice.

Embrace climate change.

 

[Muhammed]

TLDR: Increase is one-hundredth of a degree. Margin of error is a tenth of a degree. So it’s all bullshit.

So, in other words, you don't understand statistics, and neither did that article writer. And everyone who does understand statistics sees that clearly. You were conned again.

Actually it was a very brilliant statistician who debunked the MBH hockey stick.

It's you who have been conned. It can happen to anyone. I believed CAGW bullshit at first too. However, it takes a reasonable person who doesn't have a super fragile ego to admit to themselves that they've been conned. The scientific papers are probably too technical for someone like you to comprehend, however after wikileaks released the climategate emails everyone who believed the CAGW bullshit should have realized that they were conned.

I think you have been indoctrinated into Al Gore's doomsday cult.

Dumb ass, the hockey stick has been confirmed more than a dozen times. Just the latest;

That's ridiculous. jackass. It's a waste of time to even bother reading that paper. All I have to do is look at the citations to know it is not sound science. The citations read like a who's who of the climategate fraudsters.

 

[Old Rocks]

Look, little lying cocksucker, you will not read a scientific paper in any case. You are simply to ignorant to understand anything beyond third grade science.

 

[Muhammed]

Look, little lying cocksucker, you will not read a scientific paper in any case. You are simply to ignorant to understand anything beyond third grade science.

Sounds like psychological projection to me.

You climategate deniers are hilarious.

 

[Old Rocks]

Global sea ice records broken (again)

I realize that most of the deniars are unable to read even a simple graph like this, but that is hardly psychological projection.