Tech_Esq
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Diebold.
Please post a complete and coherent thought if you can. Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Diebold.
Diebold.
Please post a complete and coherent thought if you can. Thanks
so, Diebold decided to cheat for the dems in 2006 and 2008, since they used the same machines those years alsoDiebold.
Please post a complete and coherent thought if you can. Thanks
Ok, let's try: I said Diebold.
There are many organizations that are in the business of getting voter registrations and many have had similar problems, but because Acorn was an organization with a connection to Candidate Obama the right wing smear machine latched onto this as a way to attack him.
It is all bull.
There are many organizations that are in the business of getting voter registrations and many have had similar problems, but because Acorn was an organization with a connection to Candidate Obama the right wing smear machine latched onto this as a way to attack him.
It is all bull.
No other organization has a history of the level of corruption that ACORN does that is involved in voter registration drives. I just posted a list of more than half a dozen convictions and indictments against ACORN yesterday on another thread.
They are a CORRUPT organization. Why do you support a corrupt organization?
If Acorn was corrupt as you suggest why hasn't the prosecuter brought charges against the organization? It has only brought charges against individuals who actually committed a fraud against Acorn.
so, Diebold decided to cheat for the dems in 2006 and 2008, since they used the same machines those years alsoPlease post a complete and coherent thought if you can. Thanks
Ok, let's try: I said Diebold.
ah, so you dont believe they were made faulty on purpose?so, Diebold decided to cheat for the dems in 2006 and 2008, since they used the same machines those years alsoOk, let's try: I said Diebold.
No, I'm not saying that Diebold did anything for Dems or Reps. I know that the machines were tested and were faulty. Are we only doing Dem and Rep?
Diebold.
Please post a complete and coherent thought if you can. Thanks
Ok, let's try: I said Diebold.
Trust me, I've filed RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) actions against organizations before. Just looking at what is available in the press, ACORN is ripe for for the picking.
As to why they haven't been plucked to this point -- simple. Political influence. Especially now. With Obama's ties to ACORN they're teflon. No prosecutor that is interested in keeping their job will file any more serious action than they absolutely have to.
That's the way it works in the big-boy leagues. People have families and responsibilities. They don't have time to play hero.
give us the case cite ... let us see how skilled you are proving conspiracy as is required under a RICO filing. based on what i have read in my brief span on the board, it should make for some entertaining reading
Maybe quotas was a bad idea but Acorn is a business and any business owner needs to know that the employees are doing what they are paid for.
Fault the business model, require some other method to measure the employees productivity, whatever, but this bull of pretending that there is some neferious activity going on is just that, BULL!
No! it's not bull, the very fact that ACORN keeps feeding us this bullshit excuse year after year is what is bull.. Maybe they need to get their sorry azzes out of the voter registration business. Anyone who cannot control their employees in such an important matter needs to get the hell outta the way.
This is not about voter fraud and John McCain didn't lose because of Acorn so just breathe deep for a second.
These are people who have duped Acorn. They were paid to register voters, but instead of doing the hard work of knocking on doors they made up registrations so it looked like they were doing their jobs and could get paid.
There is no evidence that anyone voted under these false registrations and thus there was no voter fraud.
You don't know that. You're guessing.
Why are you defending a corrupt organization?
There are many organizations that are in the business of getting voter registrations and many have had similar problems, but because Acorn was an organization with a connection to Candidate Obama the right wing smear machine latched onto this as a way to attack him.
It is all bull.
No other organization has a history of the level of corruption that ACORN does that is involved in voter registration drives. I just posted a list of more than half a dozen convictions and indictments against ACORN yesterday on another thread.
They are a CORRUPT organization. Why do you support a corrupt organization?
No other organization has a history of the level of corruption that ACORN does that is involved in voter registration drives. I just posted a list of more than half a dozen convictions and indictments against ACORN yesterday on another thread.
They are a CORRUPT organization. Why do you support a corrupt organization?
If Acorn was corrupt as you suggest why hasn't the prosecuter brought charges against the organization? It has only brought charges against individuals who actually committed a fraud against Acorn.
Trust me, I've filed RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) actions against organizations before. Just looking at what is available in the press, ACORN is ripe for for the picking.
As to why they haven't been plucked to this point -- simple. Political influence. Especially now. With Obama's ties to ACORN they're teflon. No prosecutor that is interested in keeping their job will file any more serious action than they absolutely have to.
That's the way it works in the big-boy leagues. People have families and responsibilities. They don't have time to play hero.
how ironicIf Acorn was corrupt as you suggest why hasn't the prosecuter brought charges against the organization? It has only brought charges against individuals who actually committed a fraud against Acorn.
Trust me, I've filed RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) actions against organizations before. Just looking at what is available in the press, ACORN is ripe for for the picking.
As to why they haven't been plucked to this point -- simple. Political influence. Especially now. With Obama's ties to ACORN they're teflon. No prosecutor that is interested in keeping their job will file any more serious action than they absolutely have to.
That's the way it works in the big-boy leagues. People have families and responsibilities. They don't have time to play hero.
Why should I trust you? You have proven yourself to be driven by ideology rather than facts.
how ironicTrust me, I've filed RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) actions against organizations before. Just looking at what is available in the press, ACORN is ripe for for the picking.
As to why they haven't been plucked to this point -- simple. Political influence. Especially now. With Obama's ties to ACORN they're teflon. No prosecutor that is interested in keeping their job will file any more serious action than they absolutely have to.
That's the way it works in the big-boy leagues. People have families and responsibilities. They don't have time to play hero.
Why should I trust you? You have proven yourself to be driven by ideology rather than facts.
LOL
coming from a partisan hack like you
ah, so you dont believe they were made faulty on purpose?so, Diebold decided to cheat for the dems in 2006 and 2008, since they used the same machines those years also
No, I'm not saying that Diebold did anything for Dems or Reps. I know that the machines were tested and were faulty. Are we only doing Dem and Rep?
no, because they didnt "assist" anyoneah, so you dont believe they were made faulty on purpose?No, I'm not saying that Diebold did anything for Dems or Reps. I know that the machines were tested and were faulty. Are we only doing Dem and Rep?
When they were found to be faulty, did you make a peep? Of course I mean in 2000 and 2004 when they "assisted" the Republicans.
no, because they didnt "assist" anyoneah, so you dont believe they were made faulty on purpose?
When they were found to be faulty, did you make a peep? Of course I mean in 2000 and 2004 when they "assisted" the Republicans.
not in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008
so why would i cry and whine
first off, i'm not crying about Acorn, but they are recieving tax payer money and commiting registration fraudno, because they didnt "assist" anyoneWhen they were found to be faulty, did you make a peep? Of course I mean in 2000 and 2004 when they "assisted" the Republicans.
not in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008
so why would i cry and whine
And how would you know that they didn't? And why cry and whine about ACORN? The election has been over for seven months? I doubt if the outcome is going to change now. Maybe this needs to be in the "sore losers" forum.
first off, i'm not crying about Acorn, but they are recieving tax payer money and commiting registration fraudno, because they didnt "assist" anyone
not in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008
so why would i cry and whine
And how would you know that they didn't? And why cry and whine about ACORN? The election has been over for seven months? I doubt if the outcome is going to change now. Maybe this needs to be in the "sore losers" forum.