More About The Tiny-Brained Non-Existent Stimulus From Tax Cuts (USA Greater Before!)

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Except at RNC, even local area businesses are thought to show up for work in the morning to open the doors to paying customers. That Fantasy aside(?): What GOP knows for certain is that they mainly want tax cuts--no one spending, especially federal revenue dollars. The deficit there is(?).

And so, it is previously noted that $1.7 bil. in one-time bonuses, and a few raises, are so far announced by about 8% of S&P companies. CNBC Fed Survey doesn't expect much more--if the total cut of the federal revenue is place at the previously noted, $75 bil. per year. 12% of that is expected to go to people with payroll income: which would be about $9.0 bil. That leaves only $7.0 bil. left to happen. 36% goes to dividends and stock buy-backs. Businesses will pay down debt, to the benefit of creditors. That is even more.

Local markets get nothing! Local stores get nothing! Local governments get mostly nothing!

Most of the tax cut windfall will boost buybacks and dividends, not workers' pockets, survey predicts

$9.0 bil. is not very much in a $19.0 tril. economy. USA was probably "Great" before any of this started!

Then there is the problem that half of tax filers already have zero liability. The refundable Child Tax Credit only adds $400.00 per. Three children or more means $1200.00, $100.00 per month. And the Holy Father isn't even married(?).

Lots of people don't get very much. Cutting the tax rates, creating even less than no liability--doesn't work.
Bush Cut Taxes in 2001 and 2003, and then spent $1.0 tril. in Iraq, unaware that Osama bin laden was actually in Pakistan. Neither Saddam Hussein nor Osama bin lade appear to have had any "Weapons of Mass Destruction," even(?).

Trump was a least offered a loan of the solid gold toilet, complete with hole.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Dung Beatle, Maybe so(?)!)
 
That extra money in your paycheck? You ignore that, it isn’t your money and isn’t good for you.
 
The payroll tax is intact. A tax cut of zero, from zero liability, is not a whole lot of extra money. From the refundable part of the child tax credit, the combined household take-home income has to be $3000.00 per month to keep up with the expected inflation this year, leaving no help with the 2.2% inflation of last year.

Supposing there is no combined income, but only the $1500.00 per month, that still mainly only addresses the two-year inflation.

No "Great" goose after all!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many welfare and unemployment checks not benefiting much from tax cuts--or state and local government benefits, generally.)
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top