Liability
Locked Account.
I'm sorry, you're reading something into the Constitution that just isn't there. Either that or you are just very stupid. You are confusing a state's right to determine when and where elections are held - which is a right that exists - with a right to shorten a Senator's term - which is a right that does not exist.
I'm afraid that YOU lose this round skippy. You should have stopped while YOU thought YOU were ahead.
Revisionist history isn't recognized.
Revisionist history? WTF? The Founders considered and rejected a recall provision in the Constitution. They set the length of a Senator's term at 6 years and the length of a Congressman's at 2. Your suggestion that a state can willy nilly shorten those terms any time they please is absurd and has absolutely no basis in the Constitution. The Constitution clearly states a Senators term is 6 years - it does not state that a Senator's term is UP TO 6 years, as you seem to suggest.
Stating the length of the term (as the Constitution obviously does) does NOT require the silly interpretation that the states cannot recall and remove the ones they give the Senate seat to hold.
Cite a provision of the Constitution that forbids the States from recalling and removing a Senator.
You can't.
You won't.
In fact, your position doesn't even make sense. Of course the States would have been free to remove one of their Senators. The whole POINT of the Senate was to give power in the Federal system TO the States. Once a State elected or appointed a Senator, they would somehow LOSE that control? Why? How would that be even marginally consistent with the Federalism and States right notion of the Senate as a component Constitutional portion of the Legislative Branch?