Mom Arrested for Taking Phone from 15 Year Old Daughter

Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
She took the phone from her daughter, shitforbrains. And the DA dropped all charges.
That doesnt change the fact that she wasnt arrested for taking the phone from her daughter you stupid moron. :21:

From your own link.

"May's ex-husband, who reported the alleged theft, told deputies that he owned the phone, but the mom says the phone was a Christmas gift from her ex-husband to her daughter."
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.

Turns out the ex-husband did not own the phone. He only gave it to the girl as a gift. It turned out it was the daughter's property.

The ex-husband was the aggressor here.

So, you, too, should read the article and watch the video before pointing fingers at others.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
She took the phone from her daughter, shitforbrains. And the DA dropped all charges.
That doesnt change the fact that she wasnt arrested for taking the phone from her daughter you stupid moron. :21:

From your own link.

"May's ex-husband, who reported the alleged theft, told deputies that he owned the phone, but the mom says the phone was a Christmas gift from her ex-husband to her daughter."


^^^ Too stupid to read it was determined it was the daughters phone and case dismissed
 
^^^ Too stupid to read it was determined it was the daughters phone and case dismissed

I, for one, giggled at the poster's irony.
teehee.gif
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.

Turns out the ex-husband did not own the phone. He only gave it to the girl as a gift. It turned out it was the daughter's property.

The ex-husband was the aggressor here.

So, you, too, should read the article and watch the video before pointing fingers at others.
Of course he didnt own the phone. However he told the cops he did and thats the reason the woman was arrested. I did read the article. Thats why I said the OP was a moron. I totally agree with what you said. The point being the woman was not arrested for taking the daughters phone. She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone.
 
Last edited:
The article seems to be saying that the woman was arrested because it was believed the phone belonged to the ex, rather than the daughter, then it was determined that it did, in fact, belong to the daughter later.

So the impetus behind the arrest was not a woman taking her daughter's phone, but the false belief that the woman had taken her ex-husband's phone.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.


It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"



.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
She took the phone from her daughter, shitforbrains. And the DA dropped all charges.

May's ex-husband, who reported the alleged theft, told deputies that he owned the phone, but the mom says the phone was a Christmas gift from her ex-husband to her daughter.

Mother arrested for taking phone away from teenage daughter

The DA dropped all charges after it was revealed it as her daughter's phone. She was arrested based on the reports of her ex-husband that the mother had stolden HIS phone.

Once those details got worked out, she was immediately released.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.


It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"



.


The ex-husband reported his phone stolen. She was arrested based on his statement.

When it was later found to be the daughter's phone, the woman was released.

What does this have to do with 'liberals'?
 
The article seems to be saying that the woman was arrested because it was believed the phone belonged to the ex, rather than the daughter, then it was determined that it did, in fact, belong to the daughter later.

So the impetus behind the arrest was not a woman taking her daughter's phone, but the false belief that the woman had taken her ex-husband's phone.

Exactly that.

Making the entire story click bait.
 
Anyway. The charges were dismessed by the county prosecutor. Though, crickets are chirping as to why she was arrested in the first place.
 
Anyway. The charges were dismessed by the county prosecutor. Though, crickets are chirping as to why she was arrested in the first place.
Better have someone read the story to you then. Its absolutely clear she was arrested because the father reported that she stole the phone from him. The retarded OP and others with the same intellect level still claim it was because she punished her daughter.
 
If the girl's dad knows why the phone was taken and still tried to get her mother put away for taking it anyway, her mother in return should try to get his visitation rights revoked because his choice of action makes it as clear as glass that he has no intention of punishing their child when she does something wrong which only makes you wonder what kind of person he is.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
 

Forum List

Back
Top