Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She took the phone from her daughter, shitforbrains. And the DA dropped all charges.Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
That doesnt change the fact that she wasnt arrested for taking the phone from her daughter you stupid moron.She took the phone from her daughter, shitforbrains. And the DA dropped all charges.Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
That doesnt change the fact that she wasnt arrested for taking the phone from her daughter you stupid moron.She took the phone from her daughter, shitforbrains. And the DA dropped all charges.Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
From your own link.
"May's ex-husband, who reported the alleged theft, told deputies that he owned the phone, but the mom says the phone was a Christmas gift from her ex-husband to her daughter."
^^^ Too stupid to read it was determined it was the daughters phone and case dismissed
Of course he didnt own the phone. However he told the cops he did and thats the reason the woman was arrested. I did read the article. Thats why I said the OP was a moron. I totally agree with what you said. The point being the woman was not arrested for taking the daughters phone. She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone.Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
Turns out the ex-husband did not own the phone. He only gave it to the girl as a gift. It turned out it was the daughter's property.
The ex-husband was the aggressor here.
So, you, too, should read the article and watch the video before pointing fingers at others.
I giggled at your inability to read my post.^^^ Too stupid to read it was determined it was the daughters phone and case dismissed
I, for one, giggled at the poster's irony.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone.
You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
Of course he didn't own the phone.
I giggled at your inability to read my post.
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
Who said it wasnt a christmas present?Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"
.
She took the phone from her daughter, shitforbrains. And the DA dropped all charges.Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
May's ex-husband, who reported the alleged theft, told deputies that he owned the phone, but the mom says the phone was a Christmas gift from her ex-husband to her daughter.
Mother arrested for taking phone away from teenage daughter
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.
She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.
It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"
.
The article seems to be saying that the woman was arrested because it was believed the phone belonged to the ex, rather than the daughter, then it was determined that it did, in fact, belong to the daughter later.
So the impetus behind the arrest was not a woman taking her daughter's phone, but the false belief that the woman had taken her ex-husband's phone.
Better have someone read the story to you then. Its absolutely clear she was arrested because the father reported that she stole the phone from him. The retarded OP and others with the same intellect level still claim it was because she punished her daughter.Anyway. The charges were dismessed by the county prosecutor. Though, crickets are chirping as to why she was arrested in the first place.