MLK would be labeled woke/racist by white people if he were alive today

[BackAgain]

Hey, Tom. May I call you Tom? You strike me as a being a Tom.

Advice: stop projecting your imbecile beliefs about how white people think. You clearly don’t have a clue. Hell, you can’t even intelligently speak for black people. But when you try to generalize how white people think when you have no way of knowing, you are simply proclaiming that you remain a racist shit head. You racist shit head. Bye for now, Tom.

 

[Correll]

Hey, Tom. May I call you Tom? You strike me as a being a Tom.

Advice: stop projecting your imbecile beliefs about how white people think. You clearly don’t have a clue. Hell, you can’t even intelligently speak for black people. But when you try to generalize how white people think when you have no way of knowing, you are simply proclaiming that you remain a racist shit head. You racist shit head. Bye for now, Tom.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

He are misquoting MLK there.

OH really? Tell that to MLK.
Educate yourself

 

[mga138]

OH really? Tell that to MLK.
Educate yourself

Take you own advice, fella.
You botched the quote when you posted, "I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

His real quote was:
"I have a dream that MY four little children will one day live in a nation where THEY will not be judged by the color of THEIR SKIN but by the content of THEIR character."
That is not a universal message, in spite of what others try to imagine. They try to symbolize and sanitize him and his message, but that mid-wit of a man with dubious character wasn't speaking for anybody else, but his own people.

As "Tom," above posted, MLK had no problem shredding other races of people and paining them with a broad brush like any other racist.
Don't fall for that "Saint Martin," nonsense that gets pushed by Rino-Republicans. His name wasn't even Martin--it was Michael, but he wanted to tap into the name "Martin Luther."

If you want an intellectual, spiritual, and philosophical hero, you'd do better to look elsewhere.

 

[IM2]

Martin would be labeled racist by the modern Woke-white-conservative-marxists were he alive today.

“Why is equality so assiduously avoided? Why does white America delude itself, and how does it rationalize the evil it retains?

The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”

— Where Do We Go From Here, 1967

“I contend that the cry of “Black Power” is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we’ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard. And, what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the economic plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years.”

— Interview with Mike Wallace, 1966

“But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it America has failed to hear?… It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.”

— The Other America, 1968

“The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.”

— The Three Evils of Society, 1967

The Woke-White-Right, Critical Post Racialism Theorists like to cherry pick king to gaslight the modern MLK antiracism movements. King would roll over in his grave if he knew that the moderate whites(a euphemism for racists) are exhibiting the same behavior they exhibited towards him. White people hated king back then, just like they hate the modern woke that continue his legacy. It goes to show you that the woke are right after all, and the white moderates are doing what they've always done.

You are 100 percent right.

 

[IM2]

He wouldnt be saying the stuff he said then, today.
So this OP is stupid and redundant.
Good job, dumbfuck.

Actually he would. John Lewis was evidence of that.

 

[TNHarley]

Actually he would. John Lewis was evidence of that.

lewis was a lying, racist douchebag. So glad he passed. The world is just a bit better off.

 

[IM2]

Simply the fact that MLK was a registered Republican would earn him the undying hatred of today's DemoKKKrat party. This is how you people operate.

Now, why was King a Republican?

According to his children and not his niece Alveda, King was not affiliated with any party. And Alveda had to apologize for saying that. I am sure that after 1964, King probably wasn't too supportive of the RepubliKKKLan Party.

 

[IM2]

lewis was a lying, racist douchebag. So glad he passed. The world is just a bit better off.

Of course he was. Anybody black who doesn't submit to white supremacy is that to some people.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Take you own advice, fella.
You botched the quote when you posted, "I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

His real quote was:
"I have a dream that MY four little children will one day live in a nation where THEY will not be judged by the color of THEIR SKIN but by the content of THEIR character."
That is not a universal message, in spite of what others try to imagine. They try to symbolize and sanitize him and his message, but that mid-wit of a man with dubious character wasn't speaking for anybody else, but his own people.

As "Tom," above posted, MLK had no problem shredding other races of people and paining them with a broad brush like any other racist.
Don't fall for that "Saint Martin," nonsense that gets pushed by Rino-Republicans. His name wasn't even Martin--it was Michael, but he wanted to tap into the name "Martin Luther."

If you want an intellectual, spiritual, and philosophical hero, you'd do better to look elsewhere.

I suppose it never occurred to you that he gave the same speech at different times with different wording? Take your own advice & do a little research.
Saint Martin? Wo ever said that.
I pointed out an actual MLK quote to prove the OP wrong & you butted in with fallacies & projection

 

[IM2]

He liked to beat up White women. Not only is that racist, he would have been totally cancelled by METOO nuts.

Of course he did. And you would have thought that if he was doing such things during Jim Crow, he would have got busted.

 

[IM2]

Take you own advice, fella.
You botched the quote when you posted, "I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

His real quote was:
"I have a dream that MY four little children will one day live in a nation where THEY will not be judged by the color of THEIR SKIN but by the content of THEIR character."
That is not a universal message, in spite of what others try to imagine. They try to symbolize and sanitize him and his message, but that mid-wit of a man with dubious character wasn't speaking for anybody else, but his own people.

As "Tom," above posted, MLK had no problem shredding other races of people and paining them with a broad brush like any other racist.
Don't fall for that "Saint Martin," nonsense that gets pushed by Rino-Republicans. His name wasn't even Martin--it was Michael, but he wanted to tap into the name "Martin Luther."

If you want an intellectual, spiritual, and philosophical hero, you'd do better to look elsewhere.

Given the state of America in the 1960's King was right to shred and broadbrush.

 

[TNHarley]

Of course he was. Anybody black who doesn't submit to white supremacy is that to some people.

maybe to some but not me. he was what he was

 

[JoeBlow]

Martin Luther King's "Abnormal" Sex Life of Orgies, Hookers... and Joan Baez—the newly released JFK File reveals all

 

[mga138]

Given the state of America in the 1960's King was right to shred and broadbrush.

The state of the USA in the 60s was much better than it is today. So-called "Civil Rights Movement," was often demanding that Blacks have access to things they didn't always deserve, things they didn't build, things they didn't understand, things they would never thrive in, and things that wouldn't temperamentally suit them (as we came to find out in time). It was done for the sake and betterment of Blacks at the expense of Whites.
It wasn't done by MLK, Rosa Parks, etc...but by Whites like LBJ, who must have erroneously assumed that Blacks were just like Italians, Irish, Germans, Jews, or any other group who, once assimilated, thrived. It didn't happened, not for want of trying, but for not understanding that groups of people are different, with different levels of intelligence and ability. Forced integration didn't lead to equality, it just furthered ruined both sides. Today, it has morphed into open discrimination and bullying of White kids (and adults), and still we struggle with "Equity." The next will be to totally take away White peoples' civil rights and see if Blacks can catch up (and they still wont).
The whole thing is a fraud which continues to perpetuate because essential factors about the groups involved have been deemed unmentionable. That leads to people scrambling for answers and grasping at straws, living in confused misery and anger, dying as society dies, too.

 

[mga138]

Martin Luther King's "Abnormal" Sex Life of Orgies, Hookers... and Joan Baez—the newly released JFK File reveals all

Even MLK's allies attest to his low moral character. His friend said that when they attended JFK's funeral, when MLK saw Jackie kneeling at her assassinated husband's coffin, MLK whispered in the church, "Look, she trying to suck him off one last time.." That's our man of God and moral messiah? He was a low-life, low I.Q. fraud. A puppet.

 

[IM2]

He would have been cancelled, condemned & attacked as a white supremist by the left as soon as he said:
"I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
Identity revolves around race for the progressives.

No, he wouldn't because he said more than that during this speech. Furthermore he was demanding that WHITES stop judging blacks by the color of our skin, not that blacks ignore white racism by listening to whites misquote him.

 

[IM2]

The state of the USA in the 60s was much better than it is today. So-called "Civil Rights Movement," was often demanding that Blacks have access to things they didn't always deserve, things they didn't build, things they didn't understand, things they would never thrive in, and things that wouldn't temperamentally suit them (as we came to find out in time). It was done for the sake and betterment of Blacks at the expense of Whites.
It wasn't done by MLK, Rosa Parks, etc...but by Whites like LBJ, who must have erroneously assumed that Blacks were just like Italians, Irish, Germans, Jews, or any other group who, once assimilated, thrived. It didn't happened, not for want of trying, but for not understanding that groups of people are different, with different levels of intelligence and ability. Forced integration didn't lead to equality, it just furthered ruined both sides. Today, it has morphed into open discrimination and bullying of White kids (and adults), and still we struggle with "Equity." The next will be to totally take away White peoples' civil rights and see if Blacks can catch up (and they still wont).
The whole thing is a fraud which continues to perpetuate because essential factors about the groups involved have been deemed unmentionable. That leads to people scrambling for answers and grasping at straws, living in confused misery and anger, dying as society dies, too.

Your post is a load of white racist bullshit.

 

[Papageorgio]

Martin would be labeled racist by the modern Woke-white-conservative-marxists were he alive today.

“Why is equality so assiduously avoided? Why does white America delude itself, and how does it rationalize the evil it retains?

The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”

— Where Do We Go From Here, 1967

“I contend that the cry of “Black Power” is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we’ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard. And, what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the economic plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years.”

— Interview with Mike Wallace, 1966

“But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it America has failed to hear?… It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.”

— The Other America, 1968

“The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.”

— The Three Evils of Society, 1967

The Woke-White-Right, Critical Post Racialism Theorists like to cherry pick king to gaslight the modern MLK antiracism movements. King would roll over in his grave if he knew that the moderate whites(a euphemism for racists) are exhibiting the same behavior they exhibited towards him. White people hated king back then, just like they hate the modern woke that continue his legacy. It goes to show you that the woke are right after all, and the white moderates are doing what they've always done.

If the great American MLK was alive today, you would have been calling him an Uncle Tom, that is how you roll.

 

[IM2]

Even MLK's allies attest to his low moral character. His friend said that when they attended JFK's funeral, when MLK saw Jackie kneeling at her assassinated husband's coffin, MLK whispered in the church, "Look, she trying to suck him off one last time.." That's our man of God and moral messiah? He was a low-life, low I.Q. fraud. A puppet.

Of course he said that.