Tom Clancy
Clancy for Ron Paul
Umm...
Wasn't McVeigh arrested back in '95?
Correction: '95
Wasn't McVeigh arrested back in '95?
Correction: '95
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK......I want to be the first to officially nominate Young Lefty for the USMessageBaords first "Stupidest Boardmember" award!!!!
Now........mind you, this forum has a good share of liberals who are just naive but this guy is just a complete dummy. He'd gladly buy a package of dog doo for $1,000.00 if you packaged it up just right!!!
s0n.......like Ive said before.........you are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out of your league over here. Its kinda like a double A baseball player being brought up to the show. They pwn themselves real quick.
Again.........I highly suggest going over and spending a couple of years posting up some of the adolescent viewpoints over at People.com first!!!
repost do to some necessary editorializing..............
I'm dodging nothing and you're still a fuckwit, boy.I'm going with the "you're a blatant fuckwit" response.So I assume you are going to go with the "blatant hypocrisy" choice? Thanks for answering.
Thanks for playing.
Your as good at dodging the question as Limbaugh was at dodging military service.
I'm dodging nothing and you're still a fuckwit, boy.I'm going with the "you're a blatant fuckwit" response.
Thanks for playing.
Your as good at dodging the question as Limbaugh was at dodging military service.
Question: Why didn't we see an effort to keep terrorist suspects from being read their rights when Timothy McVeigh blew up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, that we see now with the capturing of Faisal Shahzad? Wasn't McVeigh just as much a threat to us as Shahzad? Could this be the reason?:
He looks like us:
He doesn't:
It's the only reasonable explanation. Either that or certain politicians are just trying to cast doubt on President Obama's handling of Shahzad. Look at the shoe bomber..He was read his rights without any objection from the right. So it's either racism or blatant hypocrisy.
There is Absolutely NO Comparison based upon ANYTHING. OP? You're an IDIOT. Get used to the newly-found Moniker courtesy of *ME*
I'm going with the "you're a blatant fuckwit" response.So I assume you are going to go with the "blatant hypocrisy" choice? Thanks for answering.
Thanks for playing.
Your as good at dodging the question as Limbaugh was at dodging military service.
I'm going with the "you're a blatant fuckwit" response.
Thanks for playing.
Your as good at dodging the question as Limbaugh was at dodging military service.
Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
Your as good at dodging the question as Limbaugh was at dodging military service.
Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
OK......I want to be the first to officially nominate Young Lefty for the USMessageBaords first "Stupidest Boardmember" award!!!
Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
It's something I've seen alot around here..Attack the messanger instead of talking about the message. Typical Conservative fer' ya.
OK......I want to be the first to officially nominate Young Lefty for the USMessageBaords first "Stupidest Boardmember" award!!!
Why would you want to give up your award?
Your as good at dodging the question as Limbaugh was at dodging military service.
Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
When the messenger comes up with a message worth talking about, then it gets talked about.Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
It's something I've seen alot around here..Attack the messanger instead of talking about the message. Typical Conservative fer' ya.
Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
It's something I've seen alot around here..Attack the messanger instead of talking about the message. Typical Conservative fer' ya.
Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
As usual? You're talking out of your twat. Go somewhere that you make sense. And hint? It ain't HERE.
Translation? I haven't a good defense so I defer to someone that wasn't even the topic of my ill-fated Thread.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
As usual? You're talking out of your twat. Go somewhere that you make sense. And hint? It ain't HERE.
what defense does he need? none of you have answered his question. but you do seem to be in a full tizzy.
i think that's one for the young'un.
It's something I've seen alot around here..Attack the messanger instead of talking about the message. Typical Conservative fer' ya.
Typical Con?
It happens quite a lot.. from both sides.
Jus sayin'