frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 47,484
- 10,517
- 2,030
Wow, you're really out to twist and turn, aren't you? C-in-C of the armed forces at the time of the invasion of Iraq was.......? Who?
Which changes absolutely nothing of the truth he gave.
Bush didn't do anything alone. The Congress gave approval of everything. Just like we have video of democrats taking tours of the CIA water boarding facilities. You people just lie non-stop to support whatever ignorance you are pushing in the moment.
I'm not lying at all. You're being very aggressive and seemingly unwilling to accept what I'm saying, don't push the bullshit on me.
My point is this. And I've said it a few times.
Bush and his team sent the CIA out to gain evidence of something, whether the evidence was real or partially real. We know this, it's been documented. No one else sent them out to do this in an unethical manner.
Then when the evidence was presented, both NSA and CIA evidence, Bush chose the evidence he knew to be tainted.
Then Bush twisted this evidence and then presented this evidence to people.
I'm not saying people were ignorant of what was going on in Iraq. What I'm saying is that Bush did something unethical. Other people did things and it wasn't necessarily great, but they worked within the system, Bush didn't.
You don't have to accept this, you can continue to get aggressive when people bring this up, you can see demons that aren't there, I don't care. This is a debate, if you choose to engage in the debate and act sensibly, then great, if not, you can just stop talking to me. Either way, your choice, but I won't accept this aggressive nonsense from you.
Ah yes. The Tin Foil Hat people.
That's a myth.
The Great War of Our Time: The CIA's Fight Against Terrorism--From al Qa'ida to ISIS: Michael Morell, Bill Harlow: 9781455585663: Amazon.com: Books
Former CIA members, have long said that they were not pressured.
The Robb-Silberman Commission also investigated the accusation of pressure on the CIA, and concluded none existed.
“As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
Who said that? Nancy Pelosi in 1998.
You people are ignorant idiots.
By the way, how do you tin foil hat people, explain MI6 and all the other intelligence agencies around the world, that supported the claims? I suppose Bush secretly applied pressure on everyone everywhere, right? Childish intellects on the forums today.
I don't see the importance of anything you've said.
The CIA say they weren't pressurized. So what? They still carried out acts against the Geneva Convention. If people were allowed to get away with it in Abu Ghraib, why wouldn't they have been allowed to get away with it in Camp X-Ray?
Why was it allowed to happen? There's a difference between actively breaking the Geneva Convention and allowing it to happen, but they're both breaking the Geneva Convention. Simple as.
As for your argument that "You people are ignorant idiots", your argument is an insult. Are you serious? You're telling people they have low intellects and then insulting them. Hmmmm.....
No stupid.... my argument was the numerous investigations, and eye witness accounts, that contradict your asinine claim that Bush magically pressured everyone on the planet to fabricate intelligence in support of the Iraq war.
Me insulting you as stupid, is my interpretation of the evidence, the evidence of your post, that you people are in fact STUPID. That's what the claims of your post, indicate about you.
You want to argue about what happened in Abu Ghraib, fine. I agree with that assessment.
What's that go to do with the magic "Bush pushed intelligence agencies world wide, and for the decade before being president, to make up false evidence" theory that I was responding to? Sudden topic change, when your idiocy was pointed out?
You are dismissed. Grow up, and then come back.
So, your argument is basically to insult and put people down, then you demand I grow up?
Er.... bye.