Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 54,242
- 16,467
- 2,250
Buddy boy, you better remind Flynn about that, because he just told the judge otherwise. And guess what counts? LOl! You can rest assured, it won't be what you have to say about it, so dream on in your alternate universe.Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.
Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.
I don't understand what the point of these elaborate webs of pseudo-legal nonsense that our resident conservatives are huffing lately.
Flynn's own lawyers, IN COURT, say that Flynn wasn't entrapped. And these silly conservatives ignore them entirely, making up their own imaginary narrative of made up gibberish that might as well begin with 'once upon a time'.
Honestly, what's the point of a 'legal' argument that has no application in the law nor is recognized in any court?
Self soothing? A rhetorical binky is the only thing I can think of.