REVxERIK
CLASSIC LIBERAL
- Sep 2, 2009
- 715
- 21
- 16
That's just foolish... The person independently deduces something and you automatically dismiss it because some pundit agrees with the person?What happens when a pundit states an opinion that was already independently deduced by another person? Are they automatically "mouthpieces" for that pundit?
That may be, but you don't know how those people came to formulate those opinions...
1. Yes, that's my opinion at least
IMHO, that is just rediculous and pretty damn partisan...
how is it partisan?
and i mean that taking what someone says without research is what makes a mouth piece
let's not call names