Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I heard Mitch McConnell on CNN this morning raving about how Obama is going to destroy MediCare and how his mother depends on MediCare and the benefits that this government run health plan provides. Yet, on the other hand, he is completely against a government OPTION for healthcare for others who cannot afford insurance. Can someone tell me what the difference is?
Once instituted, you can't climb out from under it. Just like welfare. Once it's there, it's there forever.
Second difference...ppl who receive medicare are US citizens and either they or their spouses have worked in this country to gain that coverage.
Not so with the gov't care Obama's providing. It's medicaid, essentially. The people who are going to benefit are 40 year old deadbeats who won't work and illegal aliens, apparently.
Once instituted, you can't climb out from under it. Just like welfare. Once it's there, it's there forever.
Second difference...ppl who receive medicare are US citizens and either they or their spouses have worked in this country to gain that coverage.
Not so with the gov't care Obama's providing. It's medicaid, essentially. The people who are going to benefit are 40 year old deadbeats who won't work and illegal aliens, apparently.
OK,AllieBaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....besides talking points from Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh, do you have anything to offer?
Once instituted, you can't climb out from under it. Just like welfare. Once it's there, it's there forever.
Second difference...ppl who receive medicare are US citizens and either they or their spouses have worked in this country to gain that coverage.
Not so with the gov't care Obama's providing. It's medicaid, essentially. The people who are going to benefit are 40 year old deadbeats who won't work and illegal aliens, apparently.
OK,AllieBaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....besides talking points from Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh, do you have anything to offer?
Once again you show that you're really not here to debate...
A poster provides you with the diferences you asked for and this is your reaction...
Typical of the rabid left...
yeah but really all i hear these days is beck and limbaugh blindly lending out opinions.
OK,AllieBaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....besides talking points from Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh, do you have anything to offer?
Once again you show that you're really not here to debate...
A poster provides you with the diferences you asked for and this is your reaction...
Typical of the rabid left...
yeah but really all i hear these days is beck and limbaugh blindly lending out opinions.
yeah but really all i hear these days is beck and limbaugh blindly lending out opinions.
All you hear? Maybe you should branch out a bit...
Pundits are paid to offer opinions... People chose to agree or disagree with those opinions... Some people take their disagreement with these pundits to rabid, spittle-in-the-mouth-corners, obsessive levels... Check out the threads started by Zona (AutoZona) in the media subforum... Now THAT'S a serious mental problem...
Once again you show that you're really not here to debate...
A poster provides you with the diferences you asked for and this is your reaction...
Typical of the rabid left...
yeah but really all i hear these days is beck and limbaugh blindly lending out opinions.
Don't waste your time with House, REV. As you can see from his post and that of AllieBaba, they have NOTHING to debate with other than empty talking points. Did you like that nice BROAD BRUSH they used to describe EVERYONE on the rolls of MediCaid, yet refuse to answer the question I posed?
What happens when a pundit states an opinion that was already independently deduced by another person? Are they automatically "mouthpieces" for that pundit?yeah but really all i hear these days is beck and limbaugh blindly lending out opinions.
All you hear? Maybe you should branch out a bit...
Pundits are paid to offer opinions... People chose to agree or disagree with those opinions... Some people take their disagreement with these pundits to rabid, spittle-in-the-mouth-corners, obsessive levels... Check out the threads started by Zona (AutoZona) in the media subforum... Now THAT'S a serious mental problem...
people need to form their own opinions with research, not listening to bat shit crazy frothing liberals and conservatives.
and by all i hear is that i live in a republican state and beck and limbaugh are often quoted
What happens when a pundit states an opinion that was already independently deduced by another person? Are they automatically "mouthpieces" for that pundit?All you hear? Maybe you should branch out a bit...
Pundits are paid to offer opinions... People chose to agree or disagree with those opinions... Some people take their disagreement with these pundits to rabid, spittle-in-the-mouth-corners, obsessive levels... Check out the threads started by Zona (AutoZona) in the media subforum... Now THAT'S a serious mental problem...
people need to form their own opinions with research, not listening to bat shit crazy frothing liberals and conservatives.
and by all i hear is that i live in a republican state and beck and limbaugh are often quoted
That may be, but you don't know how those people came to formulate those opinions...
That's just foolish... The person independently deduces something and you automatically dismiss it because some pundit agrees with the person?What happens when a pundit states an opinion that was already independently deduced by another person? Are they automatically "mouthpieces" for that pundit?people need to form their own opinions with research, not listening to bat shit crazy frothing liberals and conservatives.
and by all i hear is that i live in a republican state and beck and limbaugh are often quoted
That may be, but you don't know how those people came to formulate those opinions...
1. Yes, that's my opinion at least
I heard Mitch McConnell on CNN this morning raving about how Obama is going to destroy MediCare and how his mother depends on MediCare and the benefits that this government run health plan provides. Yet, on the other hand, he is completely against a government OPTION for healthcare for others who cannot afford insurance. Can someone tell me what the difference is?
Holy shit! Will someone just answer my question?
