Mayor of Portland, Oregon gets tear gassed by federal agents

[HereWeGoAgain]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

I dont care whether the mayor was there or not.
It has no bearing on what the rioters did.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

He was yelling black lives matter with his fist in the air.
And no they weren't protesting peacefully,for you to even make that claim is ridiculous.

The Mayor and those around him WERE exercising a Peaceful Protest on City Owned property. Since the City determines what is a protest where that means that it was legal. Just having the Mayor there means that they have permission to Protest. And if Yelling is part of that protest, there is no law against Yelling. You are still using the Rioters too prevent legal and authorized peaceful protesting. Instead of going after the Mayor and those around him that were clearly not Rioting, those same efforts to break up the legal Protest should have been used to arrest the Rioters. But that t makes no sense so let's just Gas the Mayor on City Owned Property for exercising their rights under the Constitution of the United States, the State Constitution and the City Charter.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

I dont care whether the mayor was there or not.
It has no bearing on what the rioters did.

Hey, you are learning. Go after the Rioters who are NOT exercising any legal action. Arrest them, try try them and throw away the key if that's what it takes. But gassing a Legal Peaceful Protest authorized by the City of Portland should not have been done.

 

[WEATHER53]

It does not matter that some protestors may be peaceful. When fauxtestors are stabbing and blinding people then all of them must be considered dangerous. Be careful who you affiliate with and try to wrap yourself in the sanctity of .

 

[Daryl Hunt]

It does not matter that some protestors may be peaceful. When fauxtestors are stabbing and blinding people then all of them must be considered dangerous. Be careful who you affiliate with and try to wrap yourself in the sanctity of .

I have the feeling you suggest that the Rioters were invited by the Mayor. Do you know how insane that would be?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

He was yelling black lives matter with his fist in the air.
And no they weren't protesting peacefully,for you to even make that claim is ridiculous.

The Mayor and those around him WERE exercising a Peaceful Protest on City Owned property. Since the City determines what is a protest where that means that it was legal. Just having the Mayor there means that they have permission to Protest. And if Yelling is part of that protest, there is no law against Yelling. You are still using the Rioters too prevent legal and authorized peaceful protesting. Instead of going after the Mayor and those around him that were clearly not Rioting, those same efforts to break up the legal Protest should have been used to arrest the Rioters. But that t makes no sense so let's just Gas the Mayor on City Owned Property for exercising their rights under the Constitution of the United States, the State Constitution and the City Charter.

Setting buildings on fire is peaceful........got it.

 

[WEATHER53]

It does not matter that some protestors may be peaceful. When fauxtestors are stabbing and blinding people then all of them must be considered dangerous. Be careful who you affiliate with and try to wrap yourself in the sanctity of .

I have the feeling you suggest that the Rioters were invited by the Mayor. Do you know how insane that would be?

Lots of diversionary “if” assumptions with no backing

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

I dont care whether the mayor was there or not.
It has no bearing on what the rioters did.

Hey, you are learning. Go after the Rioters who are NOT exercising any legal action. Arrest them, try try them and throw away the key if that's what it takes. But gassing a Legal Peaceful Protest authorized by the City of Portland should not have been done.

Who authorized the riots?
I want to see the application they filed.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

He was yelling black lives matter with his fist in the air.
And no they weren't protesting peacefully,for you to even make that claim is ridiculous.

The Mayor and those around him WERE exercising a Peaceful Protest on City Owned property. Since the City determines what is a protest where that means that it was legal. Just having the Mayor there means that they have permission to Protest. And if Yelling is part of that protest, there is no law against Yelling. You are still using the Rioters too prevent legal and authorized peaceful protesting. Instead of going after the Mayor and those around him that were clearly not Rioting, those same efforts to break up the legal Protest should have been used to arrest the Rioters. But that t makes no sense so let's just Gas the Mayor on City Owned Property for exercising their rights under the Constitution of the United States, the State Constitution and the City Charter.

Setting buildings on fire is peaceful........got it.

Oh, I see. The Mayor and those around him were lighting the place on fire. I don't need to repeat the law and common sense over and over to someone that is just trying to get Rump Reelected.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I have the feeling you suggest that the Rioters were invited by the Mayor. Do you know how insane that would be?

As insane as protecting Antifa?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

He was yelling black lives matter with his fist in the air.
And no they weren't protesting peacefully,for you to even make that claim is ridiculous.

The Mayor and those around him WERE exercising a Peaceful Protest on City Owned property. Since the City determines what is a protest where that means that it was legal. Just having the Mayor there means that they have permission to Protest. And if Yelling is part of that protest, there is no law against Yelling. You are still using the Rioters too prevent legal and authorized peaceful protesting. Instead of going after the Mayor and those around him that were clearly not Rioting, those same efforts to break up the legal Protest should have been used to arrest the Rioters. But that t makes no sense so let's just Gas the Mayor on City Owned Property for exercising their rights under the Constitution of the United States, the State Constitution and the City Charter.

Setting buildings on fire is peaceful........got it.

Oh, I see. The Mayor and those around him were lighting the place on fire. I don't need to repeat the law and common sense over and over to someone that is just trying to get Rump Reelected.

Who said the mayor was setting the place on fire?
When you have to lie your words have no meaning.

 

[Mac-7]

Can't be busted by somebody like you.

You already have been

 

[White 6]

Can't be busted by somebody like you.

You already have been

What a useless little troll you are.

 

[Mac-7]

What a useless little troll you are.

I‘m just not buying your bs

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

He was yelling black lives matter with his fist in the air.
And no they weren't protesting peacefully,for you to even make that claim is ridiculous.

The Mayor and those around him WERE exercising a Peaceful Protest on City Owned property. Since the City determines what is a protest where that means that it was legal. Just having the Mayor there means that they have permission to Protest. And if Yelling is part of that protest, there is no law against Yelling. You are still using the Rioters too prevent legal and authorized peaceful protesting. Instead of going after the Mayor and those around him that were clearly not Rioting, those same efforts to break up the legal Protest should have been used to arrest the Rioters. But that t makes no sense so let's just Gas the Mayor on City Owned Property for exercising their rights under the Constitution of the United States, the State Constitution and the City Charter.

Setting buildings on fire is peaceful........got it.

Oh, I see. The Mayor and those around him were lighting the place on fire. I don't need to repeat the law and common sense over and over to someone that is just trying to get Rump Reelected.

Who said the mayor was setting the place on fire?
When you have to lie your words have no meaning.

If he wasn't, he's a peaceful protestor and should be protected by law. Yet him and his peaceful Protesters were gassed. And on City Property. The courts are going to have a ball with this one.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I have only one more post to this insanity.

The Mayor and his group were peaceful Protesters on City Property. The Sidewalk is NOT Federal, it's city. Yes, they were yelling but that's part of protesting legally. They were protesting the fact that Federal Brownshirts were illegally kidnapping and then releasing American Citizens. The Brownshirts are NOT Law Enforcement. They do not announce themselves outside of "Get in the Van" at gunpoint. The Peaceful Protester were not the criminals trying to stir things up. Yet, the peaceful protesters were gassed.

The looters and Rioters are always from outside the area. Some are there just for the kicks, some are there to fan the flames. But not one single on has been local. So go ahead and keep posting your "Save our Orange Deity in November" if you wish but the reason for the protest in the first place was to protest the Feds sending in the Brownshirts that kidnap and release Portland people off the streets which is City Property, not Federal Property.

Nuff said.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Enough of this Garbage. This is the last thing I have to say in this thread.

In the past, Feds have sent support but only with the request of permission of the State Governors and the Mayors. The last time the Government sent in troops without those permissions was during the time when Black Students were blocked from entering an Alabama University in the 50s. Since then, every fed sent has been done through either the request or permission of the States Governors and Mayors. Not this time. The Governors and Mayors have asked them to leave. That makes it an occupying foreign Force. This makes the federal foreign invaders no better than the imported Looters and Rioters.

Rump is losing "Bigly" and is trying to take everyone's mind off that fact. The problem is, when you have a "Private" person grab another person and force them into a Van, it's called Kidnapping. The Feds do not have juristiction. In order to get that they would need the permission of the Governor or the Mayor. They don't have it and refuse to leave when requested by the Legal Government.

It doesn't matter if the Governors and the Mayors aren't doing enough. If that's the way the "We the People" want to live, it's their business. Sooner or later, it's going to get handled like Detroit is doing it where the locals are combating the imported thugs, looters and rioters. There are still Protests in Detroit but no looting or rioting because the common person stands vigil and assists the police. For all the problems Detroit has had in the past, they are finally doing what a community must do. You want to try and break a glass window into a local store in Detroit, get ready to have your ass handed to you and then get arrested.

Now we have a wannabe Dictator sending in his Brown Shirts. I never thought that this would happen in America. These people are Invaders, not law enforcement. If they were law enforcement then they would be loaned to the Mayors as before. It's an invading foreign Force, nothing more.

The only short term solution is for the Local Cops to round these invaders up and deport them back to DC. Except for those that Kidnapped Citizens. In that case, they need a very lengthy prison stay in General Population

The Long game is to get rid of Rump in November. And BS like sending in the Unwanted Feds to kidnap citizens isn't holding real well with the voters. Well except those that will back Rump no matter how sleazy he is or how hard he stomps on the Constitution. But why would Rump ignore the Constitution? he always has and always will.

What is it about "protecting federal property" that you don't understand ?

What part of detaining citizens on the streets do you understand. It's kidnapping. That is what set off the Protest of the Federal Building. You can dance around that all you wish but November is coming.

So you're saying there wouldnt have been any rioting if it weren't for that?
Cops detain people on the street everyday.

Once again, you refuse to seperate Rioters and Looters from peaceful protesters. The Mayor was not looting and Rioting. The people around him were not looting and Rioting. They were protesting the fact that ILLEGAL detention of American Citizens was being done by an Unauthorize group of people sent by Rump. The only way to be Authorized is for the Governor, Mayor or the Chief of Police to authorize it. And none of those 3 authorized those detentions. And to gas people exercising their first amendment rights shows an ugly problem. And "We the People" should be peacefully protesting against it. But your bullyboys in the Cammies gas the Mayor instead of arresting those that come onto the property and try to riot and burn things.

Yeah....trying to block the doors with people inside and setting the building on fire is just fine and dandy.
You're a fucken moron.

Was the Mayor blocking fire exits and setting fires? If so, he should have been arrested. No, he and those around him were exercising their 1st Amendment Rights protesting peaceably. And we can't have any of that so we gas them instead of going after the criminals that are trying to set fires.

He was yelling black lives matter with his fist in the air.
And no they weren't protesting peacefully,for you to even make that claim is ridiculous.

The Mayor and those around him WERE exercising a Peaceful Protest on City Owned property. Since the City determines what is a protest where that means that it was legal. Just having the Mayor there means that they have permission to Protest. And if Yelling is part of that protest, there is no law against Yelling. You are still using the Rioters too prevent legal and authorized peaceful protesting. Instead of going after the Mayor and those around him that were clearly not Rioting, those same efforts to break up the legal Protest should have been used to arrest the Rioters. But that t makes no sense so let's just Gas the Mayor on City Owned Property for exercising their rights under the Constitution of the United States, the State Constitution and the City Charter.

Setting buildings on fire is peaceful........got it.

Oh, I see. The Mayor and those around him were lighting the place on fire. I don't need to repeat the law and common sense over and over to someone that is just trying to get Rump Reelected.

Who said the mayor was setting the place on fire?
When you have to lie your words have no meaning.

If he wasn't, he's a peaceful protestor and should be protected by law. Yet him and his peaceful Protesters were gassed. And on City Property. The courts are going to have a ball with this one.

Care to bet some money on that?

 

[White 6]

What a useless little troll you are.

I‘m just not buying your bs

Nor I, yours. If you will quit trolling I will quit responding. Ir is not like you are getting anywhere and it is only making you look impotent.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Nuff said.

The protests have been going over fifty days now! They started well before Trump got involved and sent in a single soul! You're just full of shit! You make crap up that suits your dogma.

Try for once to make you dogma conform to the facts instead...but then you wouldn't be able to whine and bitch so much, would you? You're just a fool with a big mouth.

 

[Mac-7]

What a useless little troll you are.

I‘m just not buying your bs

Nor I, yours. If you will quit trolling I will quit responding. Ir is not like you are getting anywhere and it is only making you look impotent.

As long as you understand that I’m not impressed with your personal claims which I dont accept we can sure move on or cease communicating completely as you prefer