Matt Walsh NAILS it as always

P@triot

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2011
61,052
11,530
2,060
United States
Matt is absolutely money as usual. I would add to his first point "especially young people". And then I would add to that "due to the atrocious state of the liberal education system which indoctrinates youth instead of educating them".

Matt Walsh offered three solid reasons on why socialism resonates with young people today:
  • I think the first is just stupidity. A lot of people are very, very stupid. We can’t forget that.
  • I think that young people, especially those that are lost and weren’t raised, you know, with any kind of moral foundation of any kind, you rebel against things just because they exist and you go for something else just because it’s different.
  • I think the third thing is the saddest reason . . . that we’ve lost . . . the young generation has lost what I think should be an instinct, to kind of want to go out on your own, make your own way in life, be independent, be free, you know, self-determination. These are things that a lot of people in my generation aren’t inclined to.
http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/06/03/matt-walsh-to-conservatives-explain-why-capitalism-is-morally-superior-to-socialism/
 
Matt went on to further nail the coffin in the left-wing ideology....

“So I think what conservatives have to do is come back and not just explain why capitalism makes people wealthier, but to explain why it’s the morally superior arrangement. And this shows that the moral message is what appeals to people more than anything. It speaks right to their heart,” Walsh said.

Speaking about reacting on an emotional level, Buck turned the conversation to Hambre the gorilla being shot and killed when a young boy fell into the silverback’s enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo.

Why would someone place an animal life over a human? Walsh believes it’s directly related to the rabbit hole progressives would find themselves in if they answered one question: Why is human life sacred and special?

“Why is it sacred? You know, I recognize that it must be true. Why is it true? And it must be true because there’s some sort of power, some dimension outside of our own, some creative source from which we, you know, derive that value, which is what is explained in the Declaration of Independence. And if that’s true, then that means that we have a moral responsibility to treat human life with respect and dignity. But if we have a moral responsibility, then what does that mean? And pretty soon, as progressives travel down this path and they fall down this rabbit hole and they get to the bottom, and they realize they’re wrong about literally everything they think,” Walsh said.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/06/03/matt-walsh-to-conservatives-explain-why-capitalism-is-morally-superior-to-socialism/
 
Matt went on to further nail the coffin in the left-wing ideology....

“So I think what conservatives have to do is come back and not just explain why capitalism makes people wealthier, but to explain why it’s the morally superior arrangement. And this shows that the moral message is what appeals to people more than anything. It speaks right to their heart,” Walsh said.

Speaking about reacting on an emotional level, Buck turned the conversation to Hambre the gorilla being shot and killed when a young boy fell into the silverback’s enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo.

Why would someone place an animal life over a human? Walsh believes it’s directly related to the rabbit hole progressives would find themselves in if they answered one question: Why is human life sacred and special?

“Why is it sacred? You know, I recognize that it must be true. Why is it true? And it must be true because there’s some sort of power, some dimension outside of our own, some creative source from which we, you know, derive that value, which is what is explained in the Declaration of Independence. And if that’s true, then that means that we have a moral responsibility to treat human life with respect and dignity. But if we have a moral responsibility, then what does that mean? And pretty soon, as progressives travel down this path and they fall down this rabbit hole and they get to the bottom, and they realize they’re wrong about literally everything they think,” Walsh said.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/06/03/matt-walsh-to-conservatives-explain-why-capitalism-is-morally-superior-to-socialism/
Boy, talk about your 50 cent philosophers...
 
Matt went on to further nail the coffin in the left-wing ideology....

“So I think what conservatives have to do is come back and not just explain why capitalism makes people wealthier, but to explain why it’s the morally superior arrangement. And this shows that the moral message is what appeals to people more than anything. It speaks right to their heart,” Walsh said.

Speaking about reacting on an emotional level, Buck turned the conversation to Hambre the gorilla being shot and killed when a young boy fell into the silverback’s enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo.

Why would someone place an animal life over a human? Walsh believes it’s directly related to the rabbit hole progressives would find themselves in if they answered one question: Why is human life sacred and special?

“Why is it sacred? You know, I recognize that it must be true. Why is it true? And it must be true because there’s some sort of power, some dimension outside of our own, some creative source from which we, you know, derive that value, which is what is explained in the Declaration of Independence. And if that’s true, then that means that we have a moral responsibility to treat human life with respect and dignity. But if we have a moral responsibility, then what does that mean? And pretty soon, as progressives travel down this path and they fall down this rabbit hole and they get to the bottom, and they realize they’re wrong about literally everything they think,” Walsh said.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/06/03/matt-walsh-to-conservatives-explain-why-capitalism-is-morally-superior-to-socialism/
Boy, talk about your 50 cent philosophers...
The left would take 49 cents and leave the philosopher to die with rationed food, healthcare, etc.
 
Decades ago, "conservatives" lost stomach for the social battle and turned to the economy to solve social issues. This is demonstrated in the second post.

Op: yeah ok

2nd post: jehovahs witness visit and do this: go over all the natural disasters in the world...gap...so this proves God exists.
 
The modern cnservatives economic fantasy is a leap of faith, by people afraid to fight.
What does that even mean? That's not even a coherent sentence :eusa_doh:
Read your first two posts. Its all there.

id even go so far as to say the Conservatives economic tactics to solve social problems have failed more heavily than the skinhead movement.

At least skinheads realzed their tactic wasnt working after 2 decades and went into politics. You conservatards have been going on your failed tactic for at least 5 decades!

Why dont you give up? Because its filling your bank accounts. You are cowards, corrupt and parasites.
 
id even go so far as to say the Conservatives economic tactics to solve social problems have failed more heavily than the skinhead movement.

Now that is hilarious. Libtards start the "war on poverty", spend trillions of dollars only to see poverty increase, and you want to blame conservatives?!? Bwahahahahahaha!

:lmao:
 
id even go so far as to say the Conservatives economic tactics to solve social problems have failed more heavily than the skinhead movement.

Pssst....junior.....it's not the government's job to "solve social problems". That fact that you don't even know that much is why you're unqualified (not to mention completely unarmed) to engage in this debate. True conservatives haven't attempted to "solve" a problem which not only doesn't exist (or at least didn't until libtards delivered failed socialism to the U.S.) but which is not the Constitutional responsibility of the federal government.
 
The modern cnservatives economic fantasy is a leap of faith, by people afraid to fight.
What does that even mean? That's not even a coherent sentence :eusa_doh:
Read your first two posts. Its all there.
Who is "afraid to fight"??? And what "fight" are they afraid to engage in? Again, it's an incoherent sentence by yet another illiterate libtard. Did all of you drop out of school before reaching high school or just the majority of you?
 
Why dont you give up? Because its filling your bank accounts. You are cowards, corrupt and parasites.

1.) Why don't you use punctuation? There is an apostrophe in conjunctions. You've yet to illustrate that you're aware of that fact.

2.) Am I not supposed to put money in my bank account? What's the end game? What's the goal of the idiot libtard ideology - see how poor I can be? Try to live in poverty like the Cuban's who were forced into left-wing stupidity by Fidel Castro?

Nothing lowers the bar like liberalism... :cuckoo:
 
Matt went on to further nail the coffin in the left-wing ideology....

“So I think what conservatives have to do is come back and not just explain why capitalism makes people wealthier, but to explain why it’s the morally superior arrangement. And this shows that the moral message is what appeals to people more than anything. It speaks right to their heart,” Walsh said.

Speaking about reacting on an emotional level, Buck turned the conversation to Hambre the gorilla being shot and killed when a young boy fell into the silverback’s enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo.

Why would someone place an animal life over a human? Walsh believes it’s directly related to the rabbit hole progressives would find themselves in if they answered one question: Why is human life sacred and special?

“Why is it sacred? You know, I recognize that it must be true. Why is it true? And it must be true because there’s some sort of power, some dimension outside of our own, some creative source from which we, you know, derive that value, which is what is explained in the Declaration of Independence. And if that’s true, then that means that we have a moral responsibility to treat human life with respect and dignity. But if we have a moral responsibility, then what does that mean? And pretty soon, as progressives travel down this path and they fall down this rabbit hole and they get to the bottom, and they realize they’re wrong about literally everything they think,” Walsh said.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/06/03/matt-walsh-to-conservatives-explain-why-capitalism-is-morally-superior-to-socialism/
Boy, talk about your 50 cent philosophers...

You’re over valuing the contribution.
 
Matt went on to further nail the coffin in the left-wing ideology....

“So I think what conservatives have to do is come back and not just explain why capitalism makes people wealthier, but to explain why it’s the morally superior arrangement. And this shows that the moral message is what appeals to people more than anything. It speaks right to their heart,” Walsh said.

Speaking about reacting on an emotional level, Buck turned the conversation to Hambre the gorilla being shot and killed when a young boy fell into the silverback’s enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo.

Why would someone place an animal life over a human? Walsh believes it’s directly related to the rabbit hole progressives would find themselves in if they answered one question: Why is human life sacred and special?

“Why is it sacred? You know, I recognize that it must be true. Why is it true? And it must be true because there’s some sort of power, some dimension outside of our own, some creative source from which we, you know, derive that value, which is what is explained in the Declaration of Independence. And if that’s true, then that means that we have a moral responsibility to treat human life with respect and dignity. But if we have a moral responsibility, then what does that mean? And pretty soon, as progressives travel down this path and they fall down this rabbit hole and they get to the bottom, and they realize they’re wrong about literally everything they think,” Walsh said.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/06/03/matt-walsh-to-conservatives-explain-why-capitalism-is-morally-superior-to-socialism/
Boy, talk about your 50 cent philosophers...

You’re over valuing the contribution.
You misunderstood dear - he was referring to the article. Not you. :eusa_dance:
 
id even go so far as to say the Conservatives economic tactics to solve social problems have failed more heavily than the skinhead movement.

Now that is hilarious. Libtards start the "war on poverty", spend trillions of dollars only to see poverty increase, and you want to blame conservatives?!? Bwahahahahahaha!

:lmao:
you appear to be labouring under the misapprehension that i think liberals are innocent.
 
id even go so far as to say the Conservatives economic tactics to solve social problems have failed more heavily than the skinhead movement.

Pssst....junior.....it's not the government's job to "solve social problems". That fact that you don't even know that much is why you're unqualified (not to mention completely unarmed) to engage in this debate. True conservatives haven't attempted to "solve" a problem which not only doesn't exist (or at least didn't until libtards delivered failed socialism to the U.S.) but which is not the Constitutional responsibility of the federal government.
there you go again with your fantasy that economics can stem the cultural marxist run mass immigration.
 
Why dont you give up? Because its filling your bank accounts. You are cowards, corrupt and parasites.

1.) Why don't you use punctuation? There is an apostrophe in conjunctions. You've yet to illustrate that you're aware of that fact.

2.) Am I not supposed to put money in my bank account? What's the end game? What's the goal of the idiot libtard ideology - see how poor I can be? Try to live in poverty like the Cuban's who were forced into left-wing stupidity by Fidel Castro?

Nothing lowers the bar like liberalism... :cuckoo:
ah my tablet sux.
 
I think the first is just stupidity. A lot of people are very, very stupid. We can’t forget that.
Okay, he's established himself as an elitist.

  • I think that young people, especially those that are lost and weren’t raised, you know, with any kind of moral foundation of any kind, you rebel against things just because they exist and you go for something else just because it’s different.
Straw man fallacy.

  • I think the third thing is the saddest reason . . . that we’ve lost . . . the young generation has lost what I think should be an instinct, to kind of want to go out on your own, make your own way in life, be independent, be free, you know, self-determination. These are things that a lot of people in my generation aren’t inclined to.
I think the real reason is because the Right went off the reservation a long time ago and hasn't offered any real solutions to the problems of America. In fact, the pseudo-Right has demonstrated nothing but hypocrisy and lip service to conservative principles for decades now.

If you don't want the young people of today to drink the Left's piss, you have to have a better brand. It's as simple as that. The hypocrites, liars, psychopaths, and bigots have destroyed the conservative brand.

But go ahead and call all young people stupid instead. Whatever you do, don't look in the mirror for the one to blame.
 

Forum List

Back
Top