Marriage politics... is this the answer?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by BOBO, Dec 8, 2011.

  1. BOBO
    Offline

    BOBO The Magnificent!

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2011
    Messages:
    551
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Spokane area
    Ratings:
    +57
  2. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,548
    Thanks Received:
    8,163
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,163
    The only way to know whether it's the answer is to know what question you are asking.
     
  3. likeabird03
    Offline

    likeabird03 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    413
    Thanks Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Sacramento
    Ratings:
    +60
    Yes, I say get the government out of the issue of Marriage. It has no business in what is largely a family and religious institution anyway.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,620
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,215
    WOuld you like gov't out of divorce, custody, adoption and inheritance too? Because those are also family and religious institutions.
     
  5. BOBO
    Offline

    BOBO The Magnificent!

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2011
    Messages:
    551
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Spokane area
    Ratings:
    +57
    ...U actually need to read the LINK IN DEPTH!!! It answers all your questions!



     
  6. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    I would strongly recommend anyone considering this become familiar with his state’s contract statutes, it’s likely not this simple, particularly if either party disputes the contract or refuses to abide by its terms – which is very common.

    It’s also possible for a statutory marriage to be dissolved without ‘some government bureaucrat in a black robe’ through mediation. The mediator will ensure the terms of the divorce comply with state law and a judge will sign-off on the agreement during a brief hearing.
     
  7. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    Where is Marriage mentioned in the Constitution?

    It isn't. So it falls per the 10th...to the States to recognize as they see fit.

    The Federal government has zero say...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. likeabird03
    Offline

    likeabird03 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    413
    Thanks Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Sacramento
    Ratings:
    +60
    I don't have a problem with partnerships to some degree, for reasons of property issues and the like, but I don't think it should be defining it when it comes to the traditional sense of marriage.
     
  9. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    Here:

    Incorrect. See the case law above.

    Which isn’t at issue.

    The states are subject to the Constitution with regard to the application of their laws, including marriage laws:

     
  10. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,620
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,215
    Initially I favored using the commercial code to create a "domestic partnership" that would deal with the real issues that same sex partners had. Then I discovered the gay lobby doesn't want that, because their agenda is not to solve problems but create them.
    So fuck them.
     

Share This Page