Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, what you said was completely wrong.The House impeaches dum dum, the Senate convicts and removes.
Good job parrot, I already said that. Want a cracker?
can't argue with that....I don't know anything for certain, now a days, no one does, there is so much disinformation from all angles coming at us daily!!!
I don't like this coming out at the last minute either....
my initial thoughts were that the Democrats were being set up by right wingers with some anonymous plant selling a ''story'' to them, that they could not pass up and they were going to end up getting screwed over it....!!!
Now that she is not anonymous, I still don't like it coming at the last minute... maybe I should not be so cold, but darn... why do things like this always come out at the 11th hour... did anyone know about this the last time he was up for nomination and in those hearings??
Frankly, it doesn't matter. He has led an honorable life and been a very good federal judge. Virtually no chance he would be impeached. What we have here are Democrats crying in their beer.
can't argue with that....
if kavenaugh could not be stopped for breaking the law and lying before congress the last time he was nominated, then there is no hope!
Actually, what you said was completely wrong.The House impeaches dum dum, the Senate convicts and removes.
Good job parrot, I already said that. Want a cracker?
No, it was completely accurate.
Actually, what you said was completely wrong.The House impeaches dum dum, the Senate convicts and removes.
Good job parrot, I already said that. Want a cracker?
No, it was completely accurate.
Wrong on every point, except a 2/3 majority.
Well idiot, you can't impeach someone without a plaintiff. It also has to be a felony, then you need 2/3 majority. You are one deluded hack.
Actually, what you said was completely wrong.The House impeaches dum dum, the Senate convicts and removes.
Good job parrot, I already said that. Want a cracker?
No, it was completely accurate.
Wrong on every point, except a 2/3 majority.
Well idiot, you can't impeach someone without a plaintiff. It also has to be a felony, then you need 2/3 majority. You are one deluded hack.
There is no misdemeanor here, so it would have to be criminal, that requires the female as plaintiff.
what do you mean, jellybean??can't argue with that....
if kavenaugh could not be stopped for breaking the law and lying before congress the last time he was nominated, then there is no hope!
Two quick points.
1. Kavanaugh...
2. We are usually on opposite sides, but I still like you, what is up with that?
what do you mean, jellybean??
Kavenaugh, allegedly lied to congress at his last hearing for Appellate court... saying he never saw or knew about the STOLEN democratic files the Republican operative stole from a democratic senator on the Judicial committee's desk of opposition research on a repub nominee... Kavenaugh was a lawyer for the Bush 2 team at the time, said he never saw or handled the stolen goods, or something of the sort...what do you mean, jellybean??can't argue with that....
if kavenaugh could not be stopped for breaking the law and lying before congress the last time he was nominated, then there is no hope!
Two quick points.
1. Kavanaugh...
2. We are usually on opposite sides, but I still like you, what is up with that?
"As Chief Justice John Marshall made clear in Marbury v. Madison, the courts authority extends only to legal issues. ... The size of the Supreme Court is not fixed by the Constitution. It is determined by Congress. The original Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number of justices at six.
"As Chief Justice John Marshall made clear in Marbury v. Madison, the courts authority extends only to legal issues. ... The size of the Supreme Court is not fixed by the Constitution. It is determined by Congress. The original Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number of justices at six.
Like I said, you go ahead and hang your hat on that.
Kavenaugh, allegedly lied to congress at his last hearing for Appellate court... saying he never saw or knew about the STOLEN democratic files the Republican operative stole from a democratic senator on the Judicial committee's desk of opposition research on a repub nominee... Kavenaugh was a lawyer for the Bush 2 team at the time, said he never saw or handled the stolen goods, or something of the sort...what do you mean, jellybean??can't argue with that....
if kavenaugh could not be stopped for breaking the law and lying before congress the last time he was nominated, then there is no hope!
Two quick points.
1. Kavanaugh...
2. We are usually on opposite sides, but I still like you, what is up with that?
but Kavenaugh papers that were released from his Bush years were released for this new hearing, that show he allegedly, lied about it....
"As Chief Justice John Marshall made clear in Marbury v. Madison, the courts authority extends only to legal issues. ... The size of the Supreme Court is not fixed by the Constitution. It is determined by Congress. The original Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number of justices at six.
Like I said, you go ahead and hang your hat on that.
I sure will, and there is no one to stop it.
"As Chief Justice John Marshall made clear in Marbury v. Madison, the courts authority extends only to legal issues. ... The size of the Supreme Court is not fixed by the Constitution. It is determined by Congress. The original Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number of justices at six.
Like I said, you go ahead and hang your hat on that.
I sure will, and there is no one to stop it.
We'll see little boy.
Kavenaugh, allegedly lied to congress at his last hearing for Appellate court... saying he never saw or knew about the STOLEN democratic files the Republican operative stole from a democratic senator on the Judicial committee's desk of opposition research on a repub nominee... Kavenaugh was a lawyer for the Bush 2 team at the time, said he never saw or handled the stolen goods, or something of the sort...
but Kavenaugh papers that were released from his Bush years were released for this new hearing, that show he allegedly, lied about it....
"As Chief Justice John Marshall made clear in Marbury v. Madison, the courts authority extends only to legal issues. ... The size of the Supreme Court is not fixed by the Constitution. It is determined by Congress. The original Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number of justices at six.
Like I said, you go ahead and hang your hat on that.
I sure will, and there is no one to stop it.
We'll see little boy.
Save your energy for when he nominates Jared Fogle.
"As Chief Justice John Marshall made clear in Marbury v. Madison, the courts authority extends only to legal issues. ... The size of the Supreme Court is not fixed by the Constitution. It is determined by Congress. The original Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number of justices at six.
Like I said, you go ahead and hang your hat on that.
I sure will, and there is no one to stop it.
We'll see little boy.
Save your energy for when he nominates Jared Fogle.
You thought Hillary would win too.....
Like I said, you go ahead and hang your hat on that.
I sure will, and there is no one to stop it.
We'll see little boy.
Save your energy for when he nominates Jared Fogle.
You thought Hillary would win too.....
I did? when?
They most definitely will. You can bet on it.I sure will, and there is no one to stop it.
We'll see little boy.
Save your energy for when he nominates Jared Fogle.
You thought Hillary would win too.....
I did? when?
Judge Kavanaugh, deal with it.
