WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,092
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #41
obviously, you're the one who hasn't been keeping up.
You attacked dvdud for not being there ("who was not there") yet offering an opinion ("moralize about what they should or should not have done"). That applies to gezz as well. (i can't personally attest to his armchair being more or less comfortable than dvdud's.)
why don't you admit that you attacked dvdud because you disagree with his opinion, instead of pretending that your objection is to his not having been there?
i attacked him because he lied to support his personal attack. Questions?
no, i did not lie.
Post #6 from willowtree:
“i read it bones,, it pissed me off so bad.. Ever wonder how that mofo named murtha sleeps at night?”
bullshit bonzo, i started my whole converstation with bones with "the way i remember it.she clearly intimated that what happened to lutrell and his seal team was somehow tied up with murtha.
I called her on it, and then she starts implying possible “memory malfunction”…but the implied possibility of memory loss was implied toward lutrell having the final say only, not about murtha.
she went on to say:
“the way i remember it marcus luttrell was the final say on whether or not to kill the shepards. he made the decision to let them live because of fear that murtha would have them prosecuted for murder. then of course just like he figured they would the shepards ran and told the taliban of their presence. how many seals died because they were afraid to be prosecuted for murder? I forget was it ten.? Sucks to be murtha.” yep!
now, this was in response to my already telling her she was incorrect about murtha…WRONG BONZO ANYONE WHO READS POST 6, 7, 8, AND 9 IN SEQUENCE WILL KNOW THAT YOUR ARE FLAT OUT LYING ABOUT THAT. at that point,no it wasn't bonzo it was in my original communication with bones instead of sticking her foot deeper into her mouth, willowtree could have refreshed her “memory” and looked it up, instead of attempting to defend her lie, and continuing to lie.
But she chose to continue to misrepresent the incident to smear murtha, and so i called her on it.
Then in subsequent posts she chose to get blatantly insulting toward me about the whole thing, name-calling and all that shit, so i put her in her place. Simple. you didn't put me anywhere bonzo. I repeatedly told ya to read the damn book and btw did you look at the clip i provided you,, start to finish? Welldidyahuh?
note: Not once did i call her names...i remained a gentleman, despite being called "jackass, moron"...etc.
But really-faulty memory, “technicality”, my ass. wasn't a technicality bonzo i really started my conversation with bones with iif i remember correctly. See bonzo? No technicality.
no wounds to lick here, gunny.
Now, i'll ask you the same thing i asked gary...since, same as gary, you essentially opened that door…
what is it you would suggest, gunny? That we tell our service personnel it's fine and dandy to kill innocent civilians whenever they see fit? That we just look the other way if and when they do? That we just give them a “blank check” and then allow atrocities to go unchallenged & unpunished if/when they occur?watch the film clip bonzo
is it your position that we should have no "rules of engagement"? “kill ‘em all, let god…"etc…?
As i pointed out previously, one of the goat herders was 14.
Fourteen…just a kid.
If the seals had decided to kill the two adults, they would have had to kill the fourteen year-old as well...so, are you saying that you would condone that type of conduct? Should we allow our troops to behave in a manner that we would absolutely condemn if others did it? and that's when i said you have to gall to say what should or should not have been done you weren't there in that situation watch the clip bonzo and read the book
is it ok if americans do it? Kill kids? Kill civilians?
in some cases yes it is.
Last edited: