Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is the "DERP! FOREST FIRES USED TO ALWAYS BE NATURAL, SO HUMANS CAN'T CAUSE FOREST FIRES!" argument. It just blindly assumes that humans can't possible change climate, even though all the evidence says that assumption is wrong.Whereas I believe the recent warming trend has been mistaken for AGW when in reality the majority of warming is due to the planet naturally warming s pre-glacial temperature
Mathematical truth? ... it takes truly massive amounts of carbon dioxide to raise temperature just a little ... and 1ºC is tiny ... we've seen that much temperature rise in just the past hour here in North America ...
It's kind of sad, that you literally haven't been able to come up with any new lies since 2010.
Your cult is dead. You're like an old alchoholic bragging about how he used to knock down mailboxes while in high school, as he sits in his run-down doublewide.
We've been over this before. You know you're lying, yet you lie anyways. The cult orders you to suck off the Lord of Lies, so you comply.I quoted 2 of your AGW Patron Saints. You missed it
www.usmessageboard.com
You think toddsterpatriot understands anything about GW?
I love how you ignore the actual quotes but rely on the backtracking. Context, er, or somethingWe've been over this before. You know you're lying, yet you lie anyways. The cult orders you to suck off the Lord of Lies, so you comply.
Here's just one example of you brazenly lying about the Ottmar thing, and me reaming you for it, with references.
Another record! June was the hottest month ever recorded on Earth
What book was that? And what lies do you believe he told? I bet he didn't say that. I bet he said Joe Scientist says Florida might be underwater by July 20th of 2023. I bet he didn't say that. I bet he said Joe Scientist says the Arctic might have its first ice-free summer by July 20th of...
And here's the story about how you're lying abotu Phil Jones.
Given how many years you've been lying for the glory of fascism, you have no excuse for sucking so badly at it.
You faked the quotes, either by chopping most of them out, or just outright making them up. That's the point.I love how you ignore the actual quotes
No, it's the geologic record is littered with warming trends that were not caused by CO2 so you can't necessarily attribute all warming to CO2 argument.This is the "DERP! FOREST FIRES USED TO ALWAYS BE NATURAL, SO HUMANS CAN'T CAUSE FOREST FIRES!" argument. It just blindly assumes that humans can't possible change climate, even though all the evidence says that assumption is wrong.
Last time we discussed this, you denied SB was proven ... I provided that proof ... you never got back with me on that ... did you find that "hilarious"? ... do you still deny the mathematical proof of Stefan-Boltzmann's Law? ... or do we just get crickets? ...Because it's not related to anything being discussed. You're just tossing out a term you don't understand, in an attempt to look smart. It doesn't work.
Go on. Show we're wrong. Tell us exactly why SD disproves global warming.
(This should be hilarious.)
Well, yeah. I just said that.
Again, WTF is wrong with you? Normal non-pervs don't talk like you do. Do you even understand such a thing, or are you too far gone into pervdom to grasp it?
No one does.No, it's the geologic record is littered with warming trends that were not caused by CO2 so you can't necessarily attribute all warming to CO2 argument.
I find it astounding that you actually continue to think that dealing with t^4 is some huge mathematical challenge. Kids learn to handle that in high school Algebra or earlier. Have you have Trig? Calculus? Differential Equations? Linear Algebra or Matrix Methods?Last time we discussed this, you denied SB was proven ... I provided that proof ... you never got back with me on that ... did you find that "hilarious"? ... do you still deny the mathematical proof of Stefan-Boltzmann's Law? ... or do we just get crickets? ...
Foolish little boy ...fighting with a stupid strawman ... I'm not arguing against global warming ... I'm arguing against Dr Mann's predictions of a runaway Greenhouse Effect ... and I provided a reference in the IPCC report ... did you look that up before you got bent out of shape? ... and yes, the Bible says Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were thrown into the fire and yet walked out unharmed, meaning only pediphiles get upset by talk of pediphilia ... see Daniel chap 3
I guess your algebra is too weak to understand fourth-root relationships …
Feel free to share their breakdown.No one does.
Great. I'm saying that the most that can be attributed to an incremental 120 ppm is 0.5 C. What do you think this is saying?
Well, that's a novel way to cry and run when challenged. Not. We see you cry and run like that every time you make one of your loopy cult claims.Last time we discussed this, you denied SB was proven ... I provided that proof ... you never got back with me on that ... did you find that "hilarious"? ... do you still deny the mathematical proof of Stefan-Boltzmann's Law? ... or do we just get crickets? ...
STOP BEING SUCH A BIBLE-THUMPING PERV.... and yes, the Bible says Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were thrown into the fire and yet walked out unharmed, meaning only pediphiles get upset by talk of pediphilia ... see Daniel chap 3
