Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Lewdog, Oct 3, 2017.
The 2nd shall not be infringed.
have a shit day
The Supreme Court has already ruled that the government has the right to set limits on the type of weapon one can own without special licenses. All it has to do is extend those limits to include the present assault weapons.
Yeah.....he could have killed someone.
We should make speeding illegal.
you didn't need to prove me right.
A bump stock is only as good as the rifle it's on. Dumb ass
Says you, Who gives a fuck. You don't have credibility to determine such things
What are the chances of being killed by someone using an AR type of sporting rifle? 1% of 1%? Tops? You have no credibility on the subject go back to your safe space snowflake
Funny, a guy gets caught with fully automatic guns with the serial numbers missing, that aren't registered to the ATF per the law, and a bunch of Conservatives come to the thread to defend him for it.
Now you can see why a bunch of Liberals want stricter guns laws. Not necessarily because we HAVE to have them, but because Conservatives keep pushing the line further for more lax ones.
'assault' weapons are already heavily limited.
The next time you try to take your gun into an NFL or MLB stadium give the people manning the metal detector your little speech about infringement. They could use a good chuckle I`m sure.
Separate names with a comma.