MAGA: Congress can sue CIC Bone Spur Drumpf and Spawns over emoluments Crimes! Whee! Grifter Pains!

Baz Ares

Gold Member
Feb 2, 2017
10,970
1,091
260
MAGA: Congress can sue the Great Douche and Spawns over emoluments Crimes!
Whee! New Family Grifter Pains today!
------------------------------


Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments

A federal district judge in Washington ruled Friday that a group of nearly 200 Democratic senators and representatives have legal standing to sue President Donald Trump to prove he violated the U.S. Constitution's emoluments provision banning the acceptance of gifts from foreign and domestic interests.

The U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan found that lawmakers have adequately shown that they've suffered harm from the president's alleged violation of the emoluments clause, which
prohibit government officials from accepting benefits from foreign governments unless a majority of both houses of Congress consent.Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments

:11_2_1043: This is the fair and right thang to be done.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
He can't be indicted while in office, which is what you'd need to do to sue him...This was a settled point of law for both Nixon and Clinton....You're blowing it out your ass and you know it.
IT can always be in civil court and/or charged after office.
Criminal Crimes or Civil damages. Unless pardoned in some way.
Or it's covered under Pres. legal duties protection.
Agent Orange will be living in Russia soon, or
another non-extradition country after this is over.
 
. It' makes you cringe to think a U.S. Appeals court judge would rule that 200 democrats suffered harm because civilian Trump's corporation made a profit. It just goes to show that republicans can make a mistake by appointing a "Howard-U" lawyer to the appeals court.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
. It' makes you cringe to think a U.S. Appeals court judge would rule that 200 democrats suffered harm because civilian Trump's corporation made a profit. It just goes to show that republicans can make a mistake by appointing a "Howard-U" lawyer to the appeals court.
No. That's not the issue.
It's what right and wrong.
No elected person can make money off private or voted issues in office.
Or more bad folks will run for office. Many do send alerts to others, which is wrong..
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Just SWEET!

upload_2018-9-28_21-57-30.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top