Hillary Clinton talks about successfully prosecuting enemy combatants in civilian courts as though a military court would have been less successful.
Eric Holders reputation for upholding the law leaves a lot to desired. Obviously, there is an important reason Democrats are willing to take the heat for giving Ahmed Abu Khattala a civilian trial. By giving an enemy combatant constitutional Rights reserved for Americans federal prosecutors can keep the lid on embarrassing testimony simply by blaming the defense attorney, and, at the same time, look like they are staunch defenders of the Constitution. In truth, Democrats despise the original Bill Of Rights except when it comes to giving those Rights to enemies in order to shut them up.
Of course Democrats see it differently. Senator Durbin who is famous for calling our soldiers Nazis over the treatment some prisoners received in Abo Ghraib is not nearly as outraged over enemy combatants killing Americans. He said this about sending Khattala to Gitmo:
Senator Leahy, one of the most meanspirited America-haters in the Senate, pooh-poohed Gitmo:
And God only knows what kind of a deal Khattala will get from Eric Holder if he gives Suzy Five Shows absolution. Rush Limbaugh nailed it:
A military tribunal would be more interested in getting all of the truth rather than protecting liars like Suzy Five Shows.
Prepare for the inevitable
Clinton, Suzy, and every other Democrat, will spend the next 2 ½ years telling more lies in order to prove they are not liars.
Its not like they never lied before; so why anyone would believe anything Taqiyya & Company say about anything is beyond my comprehension most especially Benghazi. Bottom line: The ongoing coverup demands more lies than every other scandal because Americans were left to die in Benghazi.
Finally, trying Khattala in a federal court guarantees the most important silence of all. There is not a chance the question of who ordered the military to stand down while our guys were still fighting for their lives will slip out by accident as it might in a military tribunal.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ168TaVs-g&feature=player_detailpage]Hillary: Benghazi Terror Suspect Should Be Tried in US Courts - YouTube[/ame]
Eric Holders reputation for upholding the law leaves a lot to desired. Obviously, there is an important reason Democrats are willing to take the heat for giving Ahmed Abu Khattala a civilian trial. By giving an enemy combatant constitutional Rights reserved for Americans federal prosecutors can keep the lid on embarrassing testimony simply by blaming the defense attorney, and, at the same time, look like they are staunch defenders of the Constitution. In truth, Democrats despise the original Bill Of Rights except when it comes to giving those Rights to enemies in order to shut them up.
. . . Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) were clear in asserting what they deem the proper course of action should be: send him to Guantanamo Bay.
XXXXX
"Im glad that they got him, McCain stated, before suggesting that the suspect should be held at Guantanamo Bay. That's where we put terrorists when we apprehend them, he said. Where else could they put him?
XXXXX
"It would be the biggest mistake for the ages to read this guy his Miranda rights," Graham asserted, pointing out that he should be held as an enemy combatant, interrogated, and mined for more information about the attacks.
"We should have some quality time with this guy, he added.
Of course Democrats see it differently. Senator Durbin who is famous for calling our soldiers Nazis over the treatment some prisoners received in Abo Ghraib is not nearly as outraged over enemy combatants killing Americans. He said this about sending Khattala to Gitmo:
What a surprise, he said sarcastically when Breitbart News asked him about the proposal: I think that is a tired response from their side.
Senator Leahy, one of the most meanspirited America-haters in the Senate, pooh-poohed Gitmo:
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) had a similar reaction. Oh, for God's sake," he replied when reporters questioned him about the idea.
John McCain, Lindsey Graham: Send Benghazi Suspect to Guantanamo Bay
Breaking Christian News and Opinion on CNMnewz.com | John McCain, Lindsey Graham: Send Benghazi Suspect to Guantanamo Bay - Breaking Christian News and Opinion on CNMnewz.com
And God only knows what kind of a deal Khattala will get from Eric Holder if he gives Suzy Five Shows absolution. Rush Limbaugh nailed it:
RUSH: Anybody want to bet me that sometime this week he will admit that the Internet video is what made him so mad that he rounded up his buddies and began the assault on the consulate? I am just going to tell you, I'm not going to predict that, but I want to go on record here on June the 17th making it very clear that, if that does happen, I, for one, will not be surprised in the least.
A military tribunal would be more interested in getting all of the truth rather than protecting liars like Suzy Five Shows.
Prepare for the inevitable
Clinton, Suzy, and every other Democrat, will spend the next 2 ½ years telling more lies in order to prove they are not liars.
Its not like they never lied before; so why anyone would believe anything Taqiyya & Company say about anything is beyond my comprehension most especially Benghazi. Bottom line: The ongoing coverup demands more lies than every other scandal because Americans were left to die in Benghazi.
Finally, trying Khattala in a federal court guarantees the most important silence of all. There is not a chance the question of who ordered the military to stand down while our guys were still fighting for their lives will slip out by accident as it might in a military tribunal.