Lurching Toward Treason

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Flanders, Dec 22, 2012.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,532
    Thanks Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,570
    [​IMG]

    John Kerry is going to be the secretary of state. Instead of wasting time contacting senators trying to stop him from being confirmed in a Senate controlled by Harry Reid —— concentrate on nailing Kerry for treason after he is confirmed. That’s not a far-fetched defense strategy for dealing with Kerry and his New World Order pals.

    After all of Kerry’s years in Washington everybody in the media should know what he is. Hussein’s media lackeys will protect Kerry in order to protect their messiah. The MSM are already pumping up his “heroism” in Vietnam. The Swift Boat Vets for Truth continue to hold a different view:


    The media’s interpretation of Kerry’s “service to his country” is in addition to their ballooning his foreign policy credentials. Once again, the facts say otherwise. Kerry not only opposed a missile defense shield for this country Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison remind us that he was a Freezenik:

    I harbor no illusions about getting a conviction for treason. Blackwell and Morrison are correct about “. . . a very high bar . . . ”:

    Whatever Secretary of State Kerry does he will do it with foreign governments behind closed doors. There is a slight chance he, or a foreign diplomat, will slip up. If NOBODY in the media is watching Kerry with an eye toward exposing him there is not a chance he will get caught.

    Based solely on public records there must be plenty of journalists willing to approach Kerry’s tenure as secretary of state the same way they would watch a known embezzler hired by a large corporation; they know he’s going to steal, it’s only a matter of catching him when he does. Make no mistake about it. Kerry will betray this country again and again just as he has been doing all of political life.

    I’ll settle for the media catching Kerry and hounding him the same way they hounded President Nixon over a political dirty trick. Catching him is the hard part.

    Also, let me reiterate something about treason that was made to order for guys like John Kerry:

    In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

    Bottom line: If a journalist(s) should catch Kerry his betrayal will quickly be defined as working for the United Nations; hence he is protected. Like I said —— hounding him out of government is the best the public can hope for.

    There is one more thing to consider. Hussein enjoys media immunity no matter what Kerry does. That’s even better than diplomatic immunity. Every Democrat is pretty much the same as Kerry on foreign policy; so they don’t count. However, should Kerry get caught he will bring down every Republican senator who voted to confirm him. Harry Reid has the 51 votes he needs; so I can’t see why any Republican should vote to confirm a man with Kerry’s history.

    Parenthetically, Secretary Clinton was different than Kerry in that she is a hardcore Lefty to be sure, but there is no evidence she ever actively betrayed this country as did Kerry when he worked to save communism in Vietnam under the guise of opposing an unjust war. After he helped bring defeat to his own country he continued working for policies that favored the Soviet Union over his own country as the record shows.

    I’ll close with a 3 second video showing Kerry expressing his view of loyalty:


    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCc-RWIp7XU&feature=player_embedded]Lurch - YouTube[/ame]​
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2012
  2. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,104
    Thanks Received:
    9,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,387
    There's a black man in the White House. Take a 4 year nap. It'll be over soon.
     
  3. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,532
    Thanks Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,570
    To Mr. H.: At my age I can’t count on four days never mind four years.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,532
    Thanks Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,570
    To jasonnfree: I received e-mail notification that you responded but your response is not listed. Here’s the e-mail:

    Dear Flanders,

    jasonnfree has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - Lurching Toward Treason - in the Congress forum of US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum.

    This thread is located at:
    http://www.usmessageboard.com/congress/269032-lurching-toward-treason-new-post.html

    Here is the message that has just been posted:
    ***************
    I'd like to know how Kerry committed treason. Some say he gave aid and comfort to the enemy by opposing the war. So free speech is only free when you don't offend the powerful? North Vietnam was never our enemy. What was the possibility of them ever doing us any harm? Zero. This should be the determining factor of whether or not a country is our enemy.
    USA was interfering in the business of a foreign country thousands of miles away, (we do this all the time by the way, we being the world's foremost aggressor nation). This doesn't take away from the bravery or dedication of the American fighting men back then. In the end, over 50,000 Americans were dead, many more Vietnamese soldiers and civilians also, and certain large corporations made lots of money. War is a business and business is very good for America's defense industy and the politicians that do their bidding.
    ***************

    Kerry and his kind did more than oppose the war. The only thing they opposed was the US military stopping Communist expansion. Kerry & Company not only gave the North Vietnam hope for a political victory they helped bring defeat to their own country by prolonging the war; thereby, costing the lives of thousands of our guys. The only controversy is exactly how many lives were lost in the prolonged war. More importantly, Vietnam provided a template for America’s enemies —— just hang in there and the American Left will win it for us. Kerry & his kind tried it again in Iraq. Remember what they were doing until the Surge finally won the war on the battlefield.

    As to interfering in foreign governments. America has every Right to interfere in the affairs of enemies who have sworn to destroy this country. Kerry & Friends rely on most Americans thinking in terms of nations rather than worldwide ideologies. In short, make the war about fighting the poor innocent women and children in one country —— never about fighting an ideology. Fighting communism in Vietnam and Islamic fundamentalism in Iraq and Afghanistan are examples. Every act of treason Secretary of State Kerry is going to commit will be wrapped in that kind of thinking. His record shows it.


    In this next excerpt you can see Kerry in Iraq was more concerned with the International community than he was in defending America:

    Snakes shed their skin many times but they remain snakes:

    Finally, to hear Hussein tell it John Kerry won’t need a lot of on the job training to be secretary of state. Hussein is right if you ask who Kerry will be serving. He certainly does not need any training to serve the UNIC (United Nations/International Community). Serving the country and the American people is another matter altogether:

     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2012

Share This Page