John Kerry is going to be the secretary of state. Instead of wasting time contacting senators trying to stop him from being confirmed in a Senate controlled by Harry Reid —— concentrate on nailing Kerry for treason after he is confirmed. That’s not a far-fetched defense strategy for dealing with Kerry and his New World Order pals.
After all of Kerry’s years in Washington everybody in the media should know what he is. Hussein’s media lackeys will protect Kerry in order to protect their messiah. The MSM are already pumping up his “heroism” in Vietnam. The Swift Boat Vets for Truth continue to hold a different view:
When Hannity asked if Swift Boat Veterans for Truth would come back to oppose Kerry’s nomination, O’Neill’s qualified response was in the affirmative: “We will do the best we can, Sean. I was contacted today, I spoke with three people that won the Congressional Medal of Honor, who will do the very best we can. We’ve got kids – heck, I mean, we have hundreds of thousands of kids who have been engaged in combat or in the armed forces. Can you imagine them counting on John Kerry to protect their back?”
To coincide with Kerry’s confirmation hearings, I plan to author a series of articles to be published in WND, reminding readers of the radical roots of Kerry’s political career, beginning with his opposition to the Vietnam War, despite advancing exaggerated claims about his three Purple Hearts supposedly earned as a military hero in that same conflict.
Why I oppose John Kerry
Exclusive: Jerome Corsi reiterates Swift Boat concerns made in 2004
by JEROME R. CORSI
Published: 13 hours ago
Why I oppose John Kerry
The media’s interpretation of Kerry’s “service to his country” is in addition to their ballooning his foreign policy credentials. Once again, the facts say otherwise. Kerry not only opposed a missile defense shield for this country Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison remind us that he was a Freezenik:
In the 1980s, Kerry campaigned for the Nuclear Freeze. The Soviet KGB, we now know, was a major funder and promoter of this disastrous idea. The Freezeniks believed that President Carter's promise to send Pershing and Cruise missiles to our NATO allies in Western Europe should be dishonored.
Freezeniks thought that the only thing we should do in response to aggressive Soviet placement of SS-19 and SS-20 Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles (IRBMs) in Eastern Europe was to freeze the West into no response. By freezing in terror, we could morally pressure the Soviets into withdrawing their missiles, the naive Freezeniks argued. Harvard's Polish-born Adam Ulam famously punctured this pink balloon: "An' wot will you doo iff they dun't?"
I harbor no illusions about getting a conviction for treason. Blackwell and Morrison are correct about “. . . a very high bar . . . ”:
Worse, Kerry went to Paris in 1971. There, he met with North Vietnamese Communists. We need to see all his notes from those meetings. Any negotiation between a private U.S. citizen and a foreign power is illegal. It violates the Logan Act of 1798. Did Kerry demand of the North Vietnamese Communists that they abide by the Geneva Convention? Or is that only a demand he made of his fellow Americans?
We do not charge Kerry with treason in the statements and actions he engaged in then. Treason consists of giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States. But this country has set a very high bar for conviction for treason -- ever since the Burr Treason Trial of 1807. Nonetheless, we do say Kerry's actions and statements then were not those to which America's top diplomat should be linked. What was he thinking?
December 22, 2012
Question John Kerry Long and Hard!
By Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison
Articles: Question John Kerry Long and Hard!
Whatever Secretary of State Kerry does he will do it with foreign governments behind closed doors. There is a slight chance he, or a foreign diplomat, will slip up. If NOBODY in the media is watching Kerry with an eye toward exposing him there is not a chance he will get caught.
Based solely on public records there must be plenty of journalists willing to approach Kerry’s tenure as secretary of state the same way they would watch a known embezzler hired by a large corporation; they know he’s going to steal, it’s only a matter of catching him when he does. Make no mistake about it. Kerry will betray this country again and again just as he has been doing all of political life.
I’ll settle for the media catching Kerry and hounding him the same way they hounded President Nixon over a political dirty trick. Catching him is the hard part.
Also, let me reiterate something about treason that was made to order for guys like John Kerry:
In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
Bottom line: If a journalist(s) should catch Kerry his betrayal will quickly be defined as working for the United Nations; hence he is protected. Like I said —— hounding him out of government is the best the public can hope for.
There is one more thing to consider. Hussein enjoys media immunity no matter what Kerry does. That’s even better than diplomatic immunity. Every Democrat is pretty much the same as Kerry on foreign policy; so they don’t count. However, should Kerry get caught he will bring down every Republican senator who voted to confirm him. Harry Reid has the 51 votes he needs; so I can’t see why any Republican should vote to confirm a man with Kerry’s history.
Parenthetically, Secretary Clinton was different than Kerry in that she is a hardcore Lefty to be sure, but there is no evidence she ever actively betrayed this country as did Kerry when he worked to save communism in Vietnam under the guise of opposing an unjust war. After he helped bring defeat to his own country he continued working for policies that favored the Soviet Union over his own country as the record shows.
I’ll close with a 3 second video showing Kerry expressing his view of loyalty:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCc-RWIp7XU&feature=player_embedded]Lurch - YouTube[/ame]
Last edited: