Old Rocks
Diamond Member
LOL From a burger flipper that claims a degree in Atmospheric Physics.LOL Yes, a link to people who actually study this field, and not an internet pretender, a particular stupid one at that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL From a burger flipper that claims a degree in Atmospheric Physics.LOL Yes, a link to people who actually study this field, and not an internet pretender, a particular stupid one at that.
LOL Another stinky 'fact' from the ass of our burger flipper.REGIONAL WEATHER EVENT... You think because the current La Niña flow is allowing a blocking high and temps to build in a small region that the whole earth is burning up. And you choose to ignore the other 87% of the Northern Hemisphere that is below average by 2-7 def F.Silly Billy, you get more pathetic every day. So why don't you send some of that cooling toward the West Coast of the US and Canada. We need it, because it is hot and on fire. There are people on this board that have been predicting serious cooling for the entire time they have been on the board, and all we have seen is warming. So, Mr. Westwall, where the hell is that cooling?We had not past the angle of incidence to the sun yet where glaciation occurs. 24.62 degrees. We have now reached 24.57 and are well past that well known Milankovich cycle point.can anyone explain what happened to the ice age we were promised in the 70's?Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.
January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.
Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.
In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.
Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.
“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]
Now we have not only the physical angle of the earth but the convergence of all major cycles into a cold phase and a cooling sun. The warming we have seen is natural response of the earths storage system which is now depleted... Cooling is here and there isn't a damn thing any of us can do but adapt.
Whether or not we are entering an Ice age this time around remains to be seen, but one major volcanic eruption could easily put us in one now...
The cooling is all over you retard.. Pull your head out of your model and look a empirical observations that have not been warmed up by your failed model.
+0.4 for the Northern Hemisphere. LOL
These are NOT primary temperature reported data. They are TOTALLY "REANALYZED" by an algorithm that PREDICTS or backcasts what THEY THINK the temperatures should be.
Run by Grad students with no accountability to scientific sharing or reporting.. And you fall for it. Consistently..
Use satellites or thermometers unless you're trying to kill me from the comedy of it all....
Last week, all week long was on average 20 - 30 degrees cooler here than the same time last year.Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.
January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.
Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.
In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.
Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.
“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]
SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroidsLast week, all week long was on average 20 - 30 degrees cooler here than the same time last year.Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.
January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.
Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.
In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.
Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.
“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]
Ah yes, the "New Alamo" for denier fools:Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 was one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.
January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.
Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.
In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.
Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.
“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]
I don't care. The sooner man destroys his climate, the sooner he wipes himself out unable to adapt and the sooner he gives the planet back to the innocent animals that the Earth will quickly recover for.
Yes, fools often laugh like rabid hyenas at things they don't understand. It provides cover for the fact that they have no idea what they are talking about.Oh.. Man.... I love me some great "Climate REANALYSIS"... It's comical.
As you know, Professor Phil Jones was the center of the Global Warming Scam at East Anglia University. Their program was considered the epitome of Global Warming Information. The disclosure of thousands of e-mails proving their efforts to conceal information discredit and even prevent opposing views from being published has wrecked the scam, hopefully forever. Data used by the United Nations IPCC and NASA findings came from EAU.
14th February, 2010
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing (it has now been disclosed that all the “raw data” was DUMPED!
There has been no global warming since 1995
Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be.
[WHAT????]
[…]
Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
Phil Jones has said that he considered suicide for his part in this worldwide scam.
Let us also recall: The e-mails leaked in the fall of 2009 allow us to trace the machinations of a small but influential band of British and US climate scientists who played the lead role in the IPCC reports. It appears that this group, which controlled access to basic temperature data, was able to produce a "warming" by manipulating the analysis of the data, but refused to share information on the basic data or details of their analysis with independent scientists who requested them -- in violation of Freedom of Information laws. In fact, they went so far as to keep any dissenting views from being published -- by monopolizing the peer-review process, aided by ideologically cooperative editors of prestigious journals, like Science and Nature.
We learn from the e-mails that the ClimateGate gang was able to "hide the decline" [of global temperature] by applying what they termed as "tricks," and that they intimidated editors and forced out those judged to be "uncooperative." No doubt, thorough investigations, now in progress or planned, will disclose the full range of their nefarious activities. But it is clear that this small cabal was able to convince much of the world that climate disasters were impending -- unless drastic steps were taken. Not only were most of the media, public, and politicians misled, but so were many scientists, national academies of science, and professional organizations -- and even the Norwegian committee that awarded the 2007 Peace Prize to the IPCC and Al Gore, the chief apostle of climate alarmism.
Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Daily Mail Online
People like Flacaltenn can pretend for a while to accept science, but eventually, they go back to being brainless political whack jobs. They simply are unable to handle the fact that things are not as they think they should be. So they ignore the science, and make up lies about the sources, knowing full well they are lies. And not caring that people can now instantly check their lies on the net.
People like Flacaltenn can pretend for a while to accept science, but eventually, they go back to being brainless political whack jobs. They simply are unable to handle the fact that things are not as they think they should be. So they ignore the science, and make up lies about the sources, knowing full well they are lies. And not caring that people can now instantly check their lies on the net.