Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA

Discussion in 'Environment' started by abu afak, Jul 6, 2018.

  1. abu afak
    Offline

    abu afak ALLAH SNACKBAR!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,115
    Thanks Received:
    519
    Trophy Points:
    250
    Ratings:
    +1,522
    Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.


    January 18, 2018

    Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

    Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

    Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

    In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

    Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

    “Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
    [......]​
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 6
    • Funny Funny x 4
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2018
  2. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    13,791
    Thanks Received:
    2,745
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +12,414
    Bwhaaaaaaaaaaa

    Not this crap again.... Your gods adjusted up several areas that were cooling again.... Funny how that happens in ares where there is no ground based checks available to show your lies..
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. toobfreak
    Offline

    toobfreak Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    10,168
    Thanks Received:
    1,919
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +12,169

    I don't care. The sooner man destroys his climate, the sooner he wipes himself out unable to adapt and the sooner he gives the planet back to the innocent animals that the Earth will quickly recover for.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. frigidweirdo
    Online

    frigidweirdo Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2014
    Messages:
    30,799
    Thanks Received:
    3,068
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,444
    Not this crap that comes from scientific data. Better to have good stuff that some dude made up with money from oil companies.

    You'll note that you didn't actually provide an argument. Just a bullshit "fake news".
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. westwall
    Offline

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    56,228
    Thanks Received:
    12,104
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +40,929




    I would love to see their raw data. Not the computer derived fiction they shovel to you mushrooms.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Markle
    Offline

    Markle Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,659
    Thanks Received:
    1,478
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings:
    +6,671
    As you know, Professor Phil Jones was the center of the Global Warming Scam at East Anglia University. Their program was considered the epitome of Global Warming Information. The disclosure of thousands of e-mails proving their efforts to conceal information discredit and even prevent opposing views from being published has wrecked the scam, hopefully forever. Data used by the United Nations IPCC and NASA findings came from EAU.


    14th February, 2010


    Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

    Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing (it has now been disclosed that all the “raw data” was DUMPED!

    There has been no global warming since 1995

    Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes

    Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be.
    [WHAT????]


    […]

    Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

    And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.




    Phil Jones has said that he considered suicide for his part in this worldwide scam.


    Let us also recall: The e-mails leaked in the fall of 2009 allow us to trace the machinations of a small but influential band of British and US climate scientists who played the lead role in the IPCC reports. It appears that this group, which controlled access to basic temperature data, was able to produce a "warming" by manipulating the analysis of the data, but refused to share information on the basic data or details of their analysis with independent scientists who requested them -- in violation of Freedom of Information laws. In fact, they went so far as to keep any dissenting views from being published -- by monopolizing the peer-review process, aided by ideologically cooperative editors of prestigious journals, like Science and Nature.


    We learn from the e-mails that the ClimateGate gang was able to "hide the decline" [of global temperature] by applying what they termed as "tricks," and that they intimidated editors and forced out those judged to be "uncooperative." No doubt, thorough investigations, now in progress or planned, will disclose the full range of their nefarious activities. But it is clear that this small cabal was able to convince much of the world that climate disasters were impending -- unless drastic steps were taken. Not only were most of the media, public, and politicians misled, but so were many scientists, national academies of science, and professional organizations -- and even the Norwegian committee that awarded the 2007 Peace Prize to the IPCC and Al Gore, the chief apostle of climate alarmism.


    Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Daily Mail Online
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Winner Winner x 3
  7. cnm
    Offline

    cnm Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages:
    12,959
    Thanks Received:
    9,020
    Trophy Points:
    2,255
    Location:
    Aotearoa
    Ratings:
    +35,869
    What a steaming load of denial. No warming since 1995!

    I love it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. cnm
    Offline

    cnm Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages:
    12,959
    Thanks Received:
    9,020
    Trophy Points:
    2,255
    Location:
    Aotearoa
    Ratings:
    +35,869
    As though you would be able to apply proper corrections. As though Muller at Home - Berkeley Earth didn't have the same curiosity and did something about it, then reinforced the scientific consensus. As though you can't access their source data at Source Files - Berkeley Earth.

    But I suppose Muller does fake science too. Oh well.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. cnm
    Offline

    cnm Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages:
    12,959
    Thanks Received:
    9,020
    Trophy Points:
    2,255
    Location:
    Aotearoa
    Ratings:
    +35,869
    Ffs. And that's supposed to be an argument for no warming since 1995?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. westwall
    Offline

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    56,228
    Thanks Received:
    12,104
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +40,929



    "Corrections" There are several reasons that are legit for corrections. Can you name them?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page