Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA

Discussion in 'Environment' started by abu afak, Jul 6, 2018.

  1. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,563
    Thanks Received:
    7,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,512
    Can anyone explain why you are so retarded and unable to look that up on the device setting in front of you? You were not promised an ice age by most of the peer reviewed science published in that period.
     
  2. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,563
    Thanks Received:
    7,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,512
    So Silly Billy is predicting a hard winter. Given the credibility of his past prognostications, better get the swim suits out for December.
     
  3. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,563
    Thanks Received:
    7,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,512
    The slide into a glacial period through the Milankovic Cycles requires tens of thousands of years. And the present amount of GHGs in the atmosphere will negate that influence.

    [​IMG]

    Roy Martin: Milankovitch cycles and Ice Age timings

    Note that the downward portion is slow compared to the time it takes for the interglacial to develop.
     
  4. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    13,802
    Thanks Received:
    2,748
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +12,441
    "And the present amount of GHGs in the atmosphere will negate that influence"

    BULL SHIT!

    Alarmist clap trap lie....

    You want to explain how the earth glaciated with CO2 levels above 4500ppm millions of times? Its idiots like you who believe in the face of massive empirical evidence to the contrary. Even the graph in your post proves you wrong..

    You need to stop playing with your broken models.

    PhanerozoicCO2-Temperatures.jpg

    Then you need to explain why the earths systems did not "runaway" when we had CO2 levels above 7000ppm and it stayed within the earths historical temperature range...

    You alarmists are fucking liars...
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2018
  5. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    13,802
    Thanks Received:
    2,748
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +12,441
    REGIONAL WEATHER EVENT... You think because the current La Niña flow is allowing a blocking high and temps to build in a small region that the whole earth is burning up. And you choose to ignore the other 87% of the Northern Hemisphere that is below average by 2-7 def F.

    The cooling is all over you retard.. Pull your head out of your model and look a empirical observations that have not been warmed up by your failed model.
     
  6. Frankeneinstein
    Offline

    Frankeneinstein Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2016
    Messages:
    4,466
    Thanks Received:
    400
    Trophy Points:
    160
    Ratings:
    +2,795
    Retarded? very scientific, the liberal academic argument

    And some day your kids will be telling others the same thing about global warming...give me an example of what "peer reviewed science" [do you know what a qualifier is"?] was saying...
    ...left wing educators, newspapers, and television were all claiming scientists were claiming that industrial pollution was going to block out the sun to the point it would trigger a new ice age [the planet has had between 17 and 19 ice ages and an equal number of "global warming" stages]...
    ...it is obvious to even you now, that was a lie, but what did come of it was a substantially increased budget for the EPA with expanded powers into the businesses and private lives of Americans...now the increase in funds is needed to prop up failing european governments whose economies are sinking into the socialist abyss...no money for you Ivan, If you're looking for a mark scam the canadians.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2018
  7. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,563
    Thanks Received:
    7,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,512
    Well now, since you have proven yourself a compete fucking idiot, here;

    What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?

    In the thirty years leading up to the 1970s, available temperature recordings suggested that there was a cooling trend. As a result some scientists suggested that the current inter-glacial period could rapidly draw to a close, which might result in the Earth plunging into a new ice age over the next few centuries. This idea could have been reinforced by the knowledge that the smog that climatologists call ‘aerosols’ – emitted by human activities into the atmosphere – also caused cooling. In fact, as temperature recording has improved in coverage, it’s become apparent that the cooling trend was most pronounced in northern land areas and that global temperature trends were in fact relatively steady during the period prior to 1970.

    At the same time as some scientists were suggesting we might be facing another ice age, a greater number published contradicting studies. Their papers showed that the growing amount of greenhouse gasses that humans were putting into the atmosphere would cause much greater warming – warming that would exert a much greater influence on global temperature than any possible natural or human-caused cooling effects.

    By 1980 the predictions about ice ages had ceased, due to the overwhelming evidence contained in an increasing number of reports that warned of global warming. Unfortunately, the small number of predictions of an ice age appeared to be much more interesting than those of global warming, so it was those sensational 'Ice Age' stories in the press that so many people tend to remember.

    [​IMG]

    The fact is that around 1970 there were 6 times as many scientists predicting a warming rather than a cooling planet. Today, with 30+years more data to analyse, we've reached a clear scientific consensus: 97% of working climate scientists agree with the view that human beings are causing global warming.
     
  8. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,563
    Thanks Received:
    7,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,512
    LOL Another stinky 'fact' from the ass of our burger flipper.

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    +0.4 for the Northern Hemisphere. LOL
     
  9. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    13,802
    Thanks Received:
    2,748
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +12,441
    Karl Et Al Warmed BS... The University of Main failed model....
     
  10. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    13,802
    Thanks Received:
    2,748
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +12,441
    Another failed appeal to authority...
     

Share This Page