Long Overdo

[Flanders]

Karl Rove’s Republicans think they can win over Hispanic voters by caving in to amnesty for illegal aliens. Logically, the strategy of caving in should apply to winning over the Democrat party’s two wealthiest and most influential constituencies; lawyers and teachers. Obviously, lawyers’ associations cannot be shutdown; especially since lawyers write the laws; ergo, lawyers cause most of the problems with the law. And let’s not forget that every lawyer works for the government.

America’s Founders did not want lawyers in the government at all as the missing 13th Amendment tells us. Here’s the XIII Amendment everyone is familiar with:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Here’s the missing XIII Amendment:

If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.

It’s no wonder lawyers who claim they defend the Constitution are busy chipping away at it. They’re afraid the missing XIII Amendment will rise again.

Go to this article for more details about the missing 13th Amendment:

Missing 13th Amendment; 16th never ratified!

Incidentally, there was yet another XIII Amendment that allowed slavery. The Civil War began and that one was forgotten:

The Original Thirteenth Amendment

Teachers are another ball game. The ED (Department of Education) can be eliminated. The education industry can be denied federal tax dollars since there is no constitutional authority for the federal government to interfere —— OR FUND —— education at any level.

Nobody needs a reason to vote against a lawyer. On the other hand teachers slipped in under the radar. I’m referring to those who go from the academy to high political office and/or extraordinary political influence. John Dewey defines the latter:

John Dewey: Bosom Serpent of American Education
Kelly OConnell Sunday, February 24, 2013

John Dewey: Bosom Serpent of American Education

The parasite class loves to demonize the people they feed off —— private sector wealth creators and the entire business community; when, in reality, the education industry is the home of contemporary evil in America. At least a few lawyers function as a brake on corporate, and medical, abuses while contemporary teachers offer nothing to society except collectivist brainwashing under the guise of transmitting wisdom.

Jimmy Carter signed the ED into law in 1979. Shutting down the ED was long overdo in 1980 when Ronald Reagan made this pledge:

Next to religious training and the home, education is the most important means by which families hand down to each new generation their ideals and beliefs. It is a pillar of a free society. But today, parents are losing control of their children’s schooling. The Democratic Congress and its counterparts in many states have launched one fad after another, building huge new bureaucracies to misspend our taxes. The result has been a shocking drop in student performance, lack of basics in the classroom, forced busing, teacher strikes, manipulative and sometimes amoral indoctrination.

The Republican Party is determined to restore common sense and quality to education for the sake of all students, especially those for whom learning is the highway to equal opportunity.…We understand and sympathize with the plight of America’s public school teachers, who so frequently find their time and attention diverted from their teaching responsibilities to the task of complying with federal reporting requirements. America has a great stake in maintaining standards of high quality in public education. The Republican Party recognizes that the achievement of those standards is possible only to the extent that teachers are allowed the time and freedom to teach. To that end, the Republican Party supports deregulation by the federal government of public education, and encourages the elimination of the federal Department of Education.

And again in 1981:

On September 24, 1981, Reagan made a televised speech to the nation in which he reiterated his proposal — and reminding of another pledge he had made about another Cabinet Department as well. Bold emphasis again mine:

As a third step, we propose to dismantle two Cabinet Departments, Energy and Education. Both Secretaries are wholly in accord with this. Some of the activities in both of these departments will, of course, be continued either independently or in other areas of government. There’s only one way to shrink the size and cost of big government, and that is by eliminating agencies that are not needed and are getting in the way of a solution.

Abolish the Department of Education
By Jeffrey Lord on 2.26.13 @ 6:11AM
Will House GOP have the courage to tackle Reagan’s unfulfilled promise as sequester looms?

The American Spectator : Abolish the Department of Education

NOTE: The bureaucrats at the EPA are interchangeable with the bureaucrats at the Department of Energy. That’s more than enough reason to shutdown the DOE.

Irrespective of Jeffrey Lord’s great call to arms, the cave-in on amnesty for illegals leaves little hope Republicans will pick up the gauntlet.

I’ll close with a reminder. The parasite class is the most potent force in today’s America. Any serious attempt to eliminate even one of their bureaucracies will trigger a battle that will make budget battles look like pillow fights. The parasite class will fight to the death (of the country) before they allow the elimination of the ED.

In addition, the Democrat party relies heavily on the TAX DOLLARS it gets from teachers’ unions, and non-teachers who also feed on the education industry. With that in mind, I’m convinced disarming law-abiding Americans is very much a part of the parasite class’ strategy of giving themselves a huge advantage should they turn to violence in order to protect their seats at the public trough. You can bet your ass they will have guns.

 

[Dr.Traveler]

Well, that's something.

When it comes to actually writing laws, I'd rather have a lawyer write them than someone that knows nothing about crafting or applying a law. I've got no problem with lawyers in the government as it means:

1. They're not out chasing ambulances
2. You get laws that do what they're meant to do.

I've seen poorly worded laws. They're fairly common place at the State level and they are always a disaster.

As for Education, the biggest problem these days isn't having too many educators in government, but too few. A sane person wouldn't expect a Congressman from Missouri to be able to competently tell doctors how to better run hospitals, but it's totally acceptable for a person with no experience in front of a classroom to explain to teachers how badly they stink at their jobs and how to do their jobs better. It boggles the mind.

 

[Flanders]

When it comes to actually writing laws, I'd rather have a lawyer write them than someone that knows nothing about crafting or applying a law.

To Dr. Traveler: You got everything you wanted in Hillarycare II.

And does applying a law include NOT enforcing laws like immigration laws and the Defense of Marriage Act?

I've got no problem with lawyers in the government as it means:

1. They're not out chasing ambulances

To Dr. Traveler: They should be. When they are busy hustling for business they are not writing complicated laws to enrich themselves and their profession.

Lawyering, the second oldest profession, enjoys seniority at the tax tub which is not an endorsement for their necessity. Because of the wonderful writing skills you ascribe to lawyers, federal and state Supreme Court Justices don’t interpret laws as much as they untangle them. There’s never been a law written that needs more than one brief paragraph to be understood. The reason a law require hundreds of pages is because lawyers do NOT want the public to understand laws. Compare the brevity of each article in the Constitution and each amendment to the length of the laws today’s lawyers write.

Also, I believe the Founding Fathers sent a subtle message in the first five words in the Bill of Rights:

Congress shall make no law. . .

2. You get laws that do what they're meant to do.

To Dr. Traveler: Like telling Americans what they must do rather than what they must NOT do. See the Eric Hoffer quote following my signature.

I've seen poorly worded laws. They're fairly common place at the State level and they are always a disaster.

To Dr. Traveler: So in your opinion the best lawyers are in the US Congress; ergo, a totalitarian central government is the answer to America’s problems. Carry that opinion to its logical conclusion and the UN’s non-existent International laws will end up being the best laws.

As for Education, the biggest problem these days isn't having too many educators in government, but too few. A sane person wouldn't expect a Congressman from Missouri to be able to competently tell doctors how to better run hospitals, but it's totally acceptable for a person with no experience in front of a classroom to explain to teachers how badly they stink at their jobs and how to do their jobs better. It boggles the mind.

To Dr. Traveler: Doctors practice a physical art that requires knowledge, training and physical skills. The art demands a very special skill necessary in surgeons. Nevertheless, when doctors botch the job they can go to jail.

Teachers brainwash children. Try locking up teachers for botching the job of education generation after generation. In short: Every parent has the Right to tell teachers they stink. Unfortunately, lawyers say no:

December 2005
Three-judge panel says parental rights end at schoolhouse door
By Lori Arnold

Three-judge panel says parental rights end at schoolhouse door

 

[LAfrique]

Karl Rove’s Republicans think they can win over Hispanic voters by caving in to amnesty for illegal aliens. Logically, the strategy of caving in should apply to winning over the Democrat party’s two wealthiest and most influential constituencies; lawyers and teachers. Obviously, lawyers’ associations cannot be shutdown; especially since lawyers write the laws; ergo, lawyers cause most of the problems with the law. And let’s not forget that every lawyer works for the government.

America’s Founders did not want lawyers in the government at all as the missing 13th Amendment tells us. Here’s the XIII Amendment everyone is familiar with:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Here’s the missing XIII Amendment:

If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.

It’s no wonder lawyers who claim they defend the Constitution are busy chipping away at it. They’re afraid the missing XIII Amendment will rise again.

Go to this article for more details about the missing 13th Amendment:



Incidentally, there was yet another XIII Amendment that allowed slavery. The Civil War began and that one was forgotten:



Teachers are another ball game. The ED (Department of Education) can be eliminated. The education industry can be denied federal tax dollars since there is no constitutional authority for the federal government to interfere —— OR FUND —— education at any level.

Nobody needs a reason to vote against a lawyer. On the other hand teachers slipped in under the radar. I’m referring to those who go from the academy to high political office and/or extraordinary political influence. John Dewey defines the latter:



The parasite class loves to demonize the people they feed off —— private sector wealth creators and the entire business community; when, in reality, the education industry is the home of contemporary evil in America. At least a few lawyers function as a brake on corporate, and medical, abuses while contemporary teachers offer nothing to society except collectivist brainwashing under the guise of transmitting wisdom.

Jimmy Carter signed the ED into law in 1979. Shutting down the ED was long overdo in 1980 when Ronald Reagan made this pledge:

Next to religious training and the home, education is the most important means by which families hand down to each new generation their ideals and beliefs. It is a pillar of a free society. But today, parents are losing control of their children’s schooling. The Democratic Congress and its counterparts in many states have launched one fad after another, building huge new bureaucracies to misspend our taxes. The result has been a shocking drop in student performance, lack of basics in the classroom, forced busing, teacher strikes, manipulative and sometimes amoral indoctrination.

The Republican Party is determined to restore common sense and quality to education for the sake of all students, especially those for whom learning is the highway to equal opportunity.…We understand and sympathize with the plight of America’s public school teachers, who so frequently find their time and attention diverted from their teaching responsibilities to the task of complying with federal reporting requirements. America has a great stake in maintaining standards of high quality in public education. The Republican Party recognizes that the achievement of those standards is possible only to the extent that teachers are allowed the time and freedom to teach. To that end, the Republican Party supports deregulation by the federal government of public education, and encourages the elimination of the federal Department of Education.

And again in 1981:

On September 24, 1981, Reagan made a televised speech to the nation in which he reiterated his proposal — and reminding of another pledge he had made about another Cabinet Department as well. Bold emphasis again mine:

As a third step, we propose to dismantle two Cabinet Departments, Energy and Education. Both Secretaries are wholly in accord with this. Some of the activities in both of these departments will, of course, be continued either independently or in other areas of government. There’s only one way to shrink the size and cost of big government, and that is by eliminating agencies that are not needed and are getting in the way of a solution.

Abolish the Department of Education
By Jeffrey Lord on 2.26.13 @ 6:11AM
Will House GOP have the courage to tackle Reagan’s unfulfilled promise as sequester looms?

The American Spectator : Abolish the Department of Education

NOTE: The bureaucrats at the EPA are interchangeable with the bureaucrats at the Department of Energy. That’s more than enough reason to shutdown the DOE.

Irrespective of Jeffrey Lord’s great call to arms, the cave-in on amnesty for illegals leaves little hope Republicans will pick up the gauntlet.

I’ll close with a reminder. The parasite class is the most potent force in today’s America. Any serious attempt to eliminate even one of their bureaucracies will trigger a battle that will make budget battles look like pillow fights. The parasite class will fight to the death (of the country) before they allow the elimination of the ED.

In addition, the Democrat party relies heavily on the TAX DOLLARS it gets from teachers’ unions, and non-teachers who also feed on the education industry. With that in mind, I’m convinced disarming law-abiding Americans is very much a part of the parasite class’ strategy of giving themselves a huge advantage should they turn to violence in order to protect their seats at the public trough. You can bet your ass they will have guns.

I agree, though history shows the laws of these UnIted States of America appear to have been written for the benefit of just a few. I know. And to that I respond:

The majority profits from the Constitution of the US mostly because in the quest to cover their hypocritical behinds, the founding fathers made the laws vague and thus vulnerable.