LOL.....so Republicans dont understand science??!!!!

[skookerasbil]

Weve been hearing this from the "intellectual" progressives for many, many years now. Its a standard talking point in this forum since forever.......stated boldly and in a patronizing way each time.

Oh...........but looky here!!!

Whats this in todays REALCLEARENERGY?


Its hysterical stuff, that's what it is.............


ADDICTED
The world’s astonishing dependence on fossil fuels hasn’t changed in 40 years

Global fossil-fuel energy use, as a share of total energy use

I report on and write about energy, and this chart still blows my mind. Every year since 1971, more than 80% of all our energy has come from fossil fuels. That’s still true today, which is surprising for two reasons. Most nuclear power plants came online between 1971 and 1990, and most renewable energy farms were built in the last 10 years. We’ve added so many more non-fossil-fuel energy sources in the past 45 years, and yet it doesn’t seem to be at all reflected in the chart.

There are few ways to understand why. First, most of the world’s clean-energy sources are used to generate electricity. But electricity forms only 25% of the world’s energy consumption. Second, as the rich world moved towards a cleaner energy mix, much of the poor world was just starting to gain access to modern forms of energy. Inevitably, they chose the cheapest option, which was and remains fossil fuels.


The world's addiction to fossil fuels hasn't changed in 40 years





As I have been saying............"climate science' is nothing more than a hobby for bozo's. Its having zero impact in the real world.


Who's not winning s0ns?

 

[deanrd]

True. Republicans not only don't understand science, they think science is a "faith".

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

True. Republicans not only don't understand science, they think science is a "faith".

Tell me how you feel about GMOs....

 

[skookerasbil]

Figured the climate crusaders wouldn't have much to say here.........and lets face it, its the ultimate poke to the eye. Its a tough thing to face the grim reality that your "science" is a house of cards that nobody gives a fuck about. ANd all you have to do is look at the presidential debates a little over a year ago. Three of them........2 hours each. How many times did the candiates debate climate change?

Exactly................ 0

 

[skookerasbil]

zErO

 

[skookerasbil]

eGg

 

[skookerasbil]

The climate crusaders cant have this little gem fall off the first page fast enough.......really makes all the talk of the "consensus science" inconsequential.

 

[rightwinger]

Weve been hearing this from the "intellectual" progressives for many, many years now. Its a standard talking point in this forum since forever.......stated boldly and in a patronizing way each time.

Oh...........but looky here!!!

Whats this in todays REALCLEARENERGY?


Its hysterical stuff, that's what it is.............


ADDICTED
The world’s astonishing dependence on fossil fuels hasn’t changed in 40 years

Global fossil-fuel energy use, as a share of total energy use

I report on and write about energy, and this chart still blows my mind. Every year since 1971, more than 80% of all our energy has come from fossil fuels. That’s still true today, which is surprising for two reasons. Most nuclear power plants came online between 1971 and 1990, and most renewable energy farms were built in the last 10 years. We’ve added so many more non-fossil-fuel energy sources in the past 45 years, and yet it doesn’t seem to be at all reflected in the chart.

There are few ways to understand why. First, most of the world’s clean-energy sources are used to generate electricity. But electricity forms only 25% of the world’s energy consumption. Second, as the rich world moved towards a cleaner energy mix, much of the poor world was just starting to gain access to modern forms of energy. Inevitably, they chose the cheapest option, which was and remains fossil fuels.


The world's addiction to fossil fuels hasn't changed in 40 years





As I have been saying............"climate science' is nothing more than a hobby for bozo's. Its having zero impact in the real world.


Who's not winning s0ns?

Drill baby drill

 

[fncceo]

True. Republicans not only don't understand science, they think science is a "faith".

 

[skookerasbil]

Is that crickets I hear coming from the climate crusaders?


Crickets chirping

 

[skookerasbil]

dang........what a ball kick this must have been to the climate crusaders who keep telling us renewable energy is so cheap and solar and wind are freight training the energy industry.

No they're not.

 

[skookerasbil]

crickets.............still............

 

[mamooth]

The funny thing is how skook actually thinks his OP wasn't whiny and retarded, and he wants people to keep looking at how stupid he is. We're glad to oblige. Everyone, make sure to keep laughing at skook.

Skook, do you know why your OP is retarded? Of course you don't, because you're a whiny cultist. If you're weren't a helpless moron, you wouldn't be a denier.

Nuclear power has failed, and hydropower is essentially static, but power demand grew. That means until recently, fossil fuel was the only option. Until recently. Now renewables are making skook and his ghey pals cry.

You won't address that issue, skook, because you have no gonads. You'll do what you always do, which is flap your limp wrists around and change the subject.

 

[skookerasbil]

The funny thing is how skook actually thinks his OP wasn't whiny and retarded, and he wants people to keep looking at how stupid he is. We're glad to oblige. Everyone, make sure to keep laughing at skook.

Skook, do you know why your OP is retarded? Of course you don't, because you're a whiny cultist. If you're weren't a helpless moron, you wouldn't be a denier.

Nuclear power has failed, and hydropower is essentially static, but power demand grew. That means until recently, fossil fuel was the only option. Until recently. Now renewables are making skook and his ghey pals cry.

You won't address that issue, skook, because you have no gonads. You'll do what you always do, which is flap your limp wrists around and change the subject.

yuk..........yuk............. http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/eia-aeo2014-forecast-512x384.png


Whatever you say s0n!!

 

[Billy_Bob]

True. Republicans not only don't understand science, they think science is a "faith".

In the case of alarmists... it is faith..

You have still to post Empirical Evidence proving your religion..

 

[Old Rocks]

The funny thing is how skook actually thinks his OP wasn't whiny and retarded, and he wants people to keep looking at how stupid he is. We're glad to oblige. Everyone, make sure to keep laughing at skook.

Skook, do you know why your OP is retarded? Of course you don't, because you're a whiny cultist. If you're weren't a helpless moron, you wouldn't be a denier.

Nuclear power has failed, and hydropower is essentially static, but power demand grew. That means until recently, fossil fuel was the only option. Until recently. Now renewables are making skook and his ghey pals cry.

You won't address that issue, skook, because you have no gonads. You'll do what you always do, which is flap your limp wrists around and change the subject.

yuk..........yuk............. http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/eia-aeo2014-forecast-512x384.png


Whatever you say s0n!!

• Renewable energy accounted for 43% of new US electricity generation capacity in the first half (H1) of 2016, and 29% of new capacity in the second quarter (Q2) of 2016.
• Natural gas accounted for 57% of new US electricity generation capacity in H1 2016, and 71% of new capacity in Q2 2016.
• Coal electricity generation capacity actually declined by 15 GW from the end of Q2 2015 to the end of Q2 2016, due to the retirement of numerous coal power plants and no new coal power plants.
• Renewables now account for 19% of all US electricity generation capacity.
• Renewable electricity generation jumped from 14% of US electricity in H1 of 2015 to 17% of US electricity in H1 of 2016.
• Coal electricity generation dropped from 34% of US electricity generation in H1 2015 to 28% of US electricity generation in H1 2016.

Renewables = 43% Of New Electricity Capacity In USA In H1 2016 (CleanTechnica Electricity Report) | CleanTechnica

43% of the new generation in the first half of 2016. And ten years ago, what was that percentage?

 

[Old Rocks]

The funny thing is how skook actually thinks his OP wasn't whiny and retarded, and he wants people to keep looking at how stupid he is. We're glad to oblige. Everyone, make sure to keep laughing at skook.

Skook, do you know why your OP is retarded? Of course you don't, because you're a whiny cultist. If you're weren't a helpless moron, you wouldn't be a denier.

Nuclear power has failed, and hydropower is essentially static, but power demand grew. That means until recently, fossil fuel was the only option. Until recently. Now renewables are making skook and his ghey pals cry.

You won't address that issue, skook, because you have no gonads. You'll do what you always do, which is flap your limp wrists around and change the subject.

yuk..........yuk............. http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/eia-aeo2014-forecast-512x384.png


Whatever you say s0n!!

http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/eia-aeo2014-forecast-512x384.png

By God, you can't just make this stuff up! That was made in 2012. It has renewables at 10% in 2040. Yet it was 17% in 2016. In four years whomever make this graph has been shown to be an ignoramus.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The funny thing is how skook actually thinks his OP wasn't whiny and retarded, and he wants people to keep looking at how stupid he is. We're glad to oblige. Everyone, make sure to keep laughing at skook.

Skook, do you know why your OP is retarded? Of course you don't, because you're a whiny cultist. If you're weren't a helpless moron, you wouldn't be a denier.

Nuclear power has failed, and hydropower is essentially static, but power demand grew. That means until recently, fossil fuel was the only option. Until recently. Now renewables are making skook and his ghey pals cry.

You won't address that issue, skook, because you have no gonads. You'll do what you always do, which is flap your limp wrists around and change the subject.

yuk..........yuk............. http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/eia-aeo2014-forecast-512x384.png


Whatever you say s0n!!

• Renewable energy accounted for 43% of new US electricity generation capacity in the first half (H1) of 2016, and 29% of new capacity in the second quarter (Q2) of 2016.
• Natural gas accounted for 57% of new US electricity generation capacity in H1 2016, and 71% of new capacity in Q2 2016.
• Coal electricity generation capacity actually declined by 15 GW from the end of Q2 2015 to the end of Q2 2016, due to the retirement of numerous coal power plants and no new coal power plants.
• Renewables now account for 19% of all US electricity generation capacity.
• Renewable electricity generation jumped from 14% of US electricity in H1 of 2015 to 17% of US electricity in H1 of 2016.
• Coal electricity generation dropped from 34% of US electricity generation in H1 2015 to 28% of US electricity generation in H1 2016.

Renewables = 43% Of New Electricity Capacity In USA In H1 2016 (CleanTechnica Electricity Report) | CleanTechnica

43% of the new generation in the first half of 2016. And ten years ago, what was that percentage?

LOL

Such Bull Shit... Tell me FuckTard what percentage of your solar and wind "Capacity" is viable?

I'll tell you.. Its less than 17%... At any given time, 83% of your CAPACITY is putting out SQUAT... ZERO....

Your fairy dust fantasy is deluding you...

 

[Billy_Bob]

The funny thing is how skook actually thinks his OP wasn't whiny and retarded, and he wants people to keep looking at how stupid he is. We're glad to oblige. Everyone, make sure to keep laughing at skook.

Skook, do you know why your OP is retarded? Of course you don't, because you're a whiny cultist. If you're weren't a helpless moron, you wouldn't be a denier.

Nuclear power has failed, and hydropower is essentially static, but power demand grew. That means until recently, fossil fuel was the only option. Until recently. Now renewables are making skook and his ghey pals cry.

You won't address that issue, skook, because you have no gonads. You'll do what you always do, which is flap your limp wrists around and change the subject.

yuk..........yuk............. http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/eia-aeo2014-forecast-512x384.png


Whatever you say s0n!!

http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/eia-aeo2014-forecast-512x384.png

By God, you can't just make this stuff up! That was made in 2012. It has renewables at 10% in 2040. Yet it was 17% in 2016. In four years whomever make this graph has been shown to be an ignoramus.

LOL....

Less than 2% of US generating is from Wind/Solar... Where do you come up with this propaganda...?

 

[Old Rocks]

Now Silly Billy, we truly understand your problem with reading, we truly do. Note that the 17% was generation, not capacity. Dummkopf. LOL