It took 'til the third paragraph for them to get to this point "The administration has now lost all credibility on this issue." Even then, it was based on "this issue"; the issue being Barry violating Americans privacy rights. Really, you can take out 'this issue.' Obama is a scoundrel. There's no need to water that down and try to make this out to be some isolated "issue."
Also, they signed their face value attempt at a scathing indictment, 'The Editorial Board.' Please. If you can't put your names to the column then that's just pathetic.
It's funny. A few months back, new management admitted that the NYT had been cheerleaders for Obama. They still are. They're just being a bit more subversive about it. And I can't help but think these weenies are whining as much as they are b/c they are among the spied upon now. They laid down like a rug for Obama and he made sure to wear boots with spurs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.html?_r=0
Also, they signed their face value attempt at a scathing indictment, 'The Editorial Board.' Please. If you can't put your names to the column then that's just pathetic.
It's funny. A few months back, new management admitted that the NYT had been cheerleaders for Obama. They still are. They're just being a bit more subversive about it. And I can't help but think these weenies are whining as much as they are b/c they are among the spied upon now. They laid down like a rug for Obama and he made sure to wear boots with spurs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.html?_r=0
