- Banned
- #81
Crick loves FUDGE, not science. If he cared about science, he would care about the questions I've asked here. He doesn't. He is a paid shill for Algore's FRAUD, and he wants my questions censored.
Here's another:
In 2005, highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere. The Tippys then "corrected" (FUDGED) that with two uncorrelated "corrections" to show "warming" that did not exist in the raw data.
When you have two and only two measures of the same thing, and both measures are highly correlated, why would there be any need to "correct" that data??
A: because Crick's taxpayer funded "job" depends on idiots believing CO2 causes "warming," which it DOES NOT.
Here's another:
In 2005, highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere. The Tippys then "corrected" (FUDGED) that with two uncorrelated "corrections" to show "warming" that did not exist in the raw data.
When you have two and only two measures of the same thing, and both measures are highly correlated, why would there be any need to "correct" that data??
A: because Crick's taxpayer funded "job" depends on idiots believing CO2 causes "warming," which it DOES NOT.