Literally THOUSANDS of WMD's found in IRAQ - PERIOD

[Kevin_Kennedy]

And nobody cared about a "mushroom cloud". Wasn't even mentioned. Sorry about your ignorance. In fact, a dirty bomb was an exponentially more likely scenario. You'r'e being exposed as the partisan, misinformed hack that you are...

So George W. Bush did not mention a mushroom cloud at all in the video I posted?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gUzD1Ud4Lk]Smoking Gun - YouTube[/ame]

Your powers of denial are impeccable.

If it weren't for singular obscure references morons like you would be lost.
It was a well known fact that Hussein had no nukes. It was also a widely held belief that he had in fact used chems on Kurds.
Had all the controversy been over nukes why didn't everyone simply say "nukes"? Much quicker and easier than incessantly referring to the threat as "WMDs".
This whole new twist on the narrative is as dumb as a birther suddenly saying, "I never said Obama was born in Kenya, I said he wasn't born in Kansas".
Pffft uber stupid.

Yes, it was well known, except the Bush Administration insisted on spreading the lie nonetheless.

 

[Bigfoot]

Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

That is not true. Are you uneducated as to military matters? WMDs are chemical. biological or nuclear.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

That is not true. Are you uneducated as to military matters? WMDs are chemical. biological or nuclear.

Ho hum

 

[Bigfoot]

Yeah, Rottweiler I guess it is time to think of radiological weapons also. I'm behind the times as that is a likely wmd (dirty bomb which uses conventional explosives) that may be detonated in the future.

 

[IGetItAlready]

So George W. Bush did not mention a mushroom cloud at all in the video I posted?

Smoking Gun - YouTube

Your powers of denial are impeccable.

If it weren't for singular obscure references morons like you would be lost.
It was a well known fact that Hussein had no nukes. It was also a widely held belief that he had in fact used chems on Kurds.
Had all the controversy been over nukes why didn't everyone simply say "nukes"? Much quicker and easier than incessantly referring to the threat as "WMDs".
This whole new twist on the narrative is as dumb as a birther suddenly saying, "I never said Obama was born in Kenya, I said he wasn't born in Kansas".
Pffft uber stupid.

Yes, it was well known, except the Bush Administration insisted on spreading the lie nonetheless.

So for over a decade the entire debate was all about finding Saddam's "nukes"?
Are you really going to throw your own credibility to the wind on such an asinine implication?
WHY ARE WE JUST NOW REFERRING TO SADDAM'S "WMDS" AS "NUKES"?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

If it weren't for singular obscure references morons like you would be lost.
It was a well known fact that Hussein had no nukes. It was also a widely held belief that he had in fact used chems on Kurds.
Had all the controversy been over nukes why didn't everyone simply say "nukes"? Much quicker and easier than incessantly referring to the threat as "WMDs".
This whole new twist on the narrative is as dumb as a birther suddenly saying, "I never said Obama was born in Kenya, I said he wasn't born in Kansas".
Pffft uber stupid.

Yes, it was well known, except the Bush Administration insisted on spreading the lie nonetheless.

So for over a decade the entire debate was all about finding Saddam's "nukes"?
Are you really going to throw your own credibility to the wind on such an asinine implication?
WHY ARE WE JUST NOW REFERRING TO SADDAM'S "WMDS" AS "NUKES"?

Nobody's just now doing anything, except for an alarming number of people making the claim that the United States invaded Iraq solely based on information that Saddam had chemical and biological weapons. This is nonsense, as it leaves out the fact that the Bush Administration claimed that Saddam was developing nuclear weapons on top of the chemical and biological weapons that everybody knew he already had.

 

[IGetItAlready]

Yes, it was well known, except the Bush Administration insisted on spreading the lie nonetheless.

So for over a decade the entire debate was all about finding Saddam's "nukes"?
Are you really going to throw your own credibility to the wind on such an asinine implication?
WHY ARE WE JUST NOW REFERRING TO SADDAM'S "WMDS" AS "NUKES"?

Nobody's just now doing anything, except for an alarming number of people making the claim that the United States invaded Iraq solely based on information that Saddam had chemical and biological weapons. This is nonsense, as it leaves out the fact that the Bush Administration claimed that Saddam was developing nuclear weapons on top of the chemical and biological weapons that everybody knew he already had.

Utterly pointless...

 

[daveman]

Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

Need some help moving the goalposts?

 

[Si modo]

The Administration even admitted that it would be very difficult to detonate a nuclear weapon, even if terrorist obtained one. Just shows what a lying piece of shit you are...

Biological and chemical weapons don't create a mushroom cloud. Sorry about your luck.

And yellow cake isn't used for chemical or biological weapons.

Retard is obvious.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rottweiler is acting doggy.

If WMDs as described by the Bushies as cause for war had been found, they would have shouted it from the roof tops.

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. *These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. *This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. *And the*press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. *The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". *Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq - NBCNews.com

NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

 

[Mr. Shaman]

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. *These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. *This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

"Pfarrer’s claims about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction are absolutely bananas."

The WMD Hype In "SEAL Target Geronimo"​

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

[JimH52]

Was this thread written by Ryan's speech writer. More history changing GOP retoric...

 

[Darkwind]

Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

What?

Were you born stupid or something?

They were not referring to JUST NUCLEAR weapons. Wow.....

 

[Mr. Shaman]

"Another pile o' Rottweiler-shit buried......"​

 

[JakeStarkey]

Quit being a dog turd like Rott. The WMDs the bushies were talking about were not found in Iraq. If they had been, we all would have had Karl or Dick at the door to tell each of us about them.

This is the type of behavior, by you, that causes people to vote for Obama, because of your lies.

Americans have not forgotten nor forgiven the Bush years.

Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

What?

Were you born stupid or something?

They were not referring to JUST NUCLEAR weapons. Wow.....

 

[freedombecki]

Biological and chemical weapons don't create a mushroom cloud. Sorry about your luck.

And yellow cake isn't used for chemical or biological weapons.

Retard is obvious.

That's because they did find the following list of Weapons of Mass Destruction put in place by CentCom sometime before 2008:

Summary of Weapons of Mass Destruction found in Iraq:​

• 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
• 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents
• 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas)
• Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas
• Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and " conventional" sarin gas, assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency*

*partial list

 

[JakeStarkey]

Not the type of WMDs that Bush, Powell, Rice, etc. were talking about, the kind that we went to war about.

Can't you be honest at all, Rott?

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. *These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. *This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. *And the*press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. *The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". *Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq - NBCNews.com

NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Golly gee, which of yu is gonna tell Paul (Lyin) Ryan about this? ... cuz ya know, there's still time to declare war on somebody and Ryan is jist the guy to do it fer ya.

 

[dblack]

Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

WTF are you talking about? Nobody ever said WMD could only Mean Nukes you asshole. You are making shit up. WMD clearly includes Chemical and Biological Weapons.

No, that was the equivocation introduced after it became clear they were likely wrong about the "yellow cake" business. By this weak-assed definition pepper spray is a "WMD". Bush sold the Iraq invasion by convincing a stunned, post 9/11 US populace that Saddam had nukes. "He lied and you knew."

 

[Paulie]

OH my god!!! Saddam had chemical weapons?!?????