Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
Cuts have to be made.So instead of saying states rights and freedom, I can sum up your entire arguement to "If you cant pay for it, tough shit"
Some of these cuts will involve less movey and fewer services to those that currently enjoy them. No way around it.
:shrug:
You can continue with all of the stock, canned, partisan fearmongering about starving old people and sick kids to your heart's content, but the -fact- remains that cuts to these programs -need- to be made because the -only- way to meaningfully address the deficit, say nothing of the debt, is to cut entitlement/social spending.
If you are not ready to accept that fact and work to help shape those cuts, you're simply part of the problem, far removed from the solution.
You really like using weasel words dont you?
Cuts to THESE programs dont NEED to be cut to MEANINGFULLY ADDRESS the deficit. Cuts to any programs need to be cut to CUT the deficit, not "meaningfully address" it. Again your entire arguement goes counter to running a government for and by the people and can be summed up to "If you cant pay for it, yeah, deal with it"
But that is not government of any nation in the world.
and that is our differential in the world my friend.
It always has been.
Yes, government is for the people and by the people....not for the people to turn to.
If the people must turn to government, then government is no longer "the people"...it is a separate entity.
I fear you are not well educated as to why the US became the larest mopst prosperous, most envied country in the world in a mere 250 years while other nations didnt even come close after thousands, if not tens of thousands of years of existance.
Sadly, seems you want to mimic OTHER nations of the world....if we did, we would not be who we are today.