&
☭proletarian☭
Guest
☭proletarian☭;1788236 said:demonstrating that social systems (including forms of government) are formed through the social contract (which you've said yourself is th case) proves the social contract theory, which posits that demonstrating that social systems (including forms of government) are formed through the social contract.
They are NOT formed by the social contract. They are formed by force and consent of a majority.
Consent of the majority = the actions/will of the masses = the social contract
(consent of a majority is not a social contract)
Their agreement is the contract/compact between them. The socioal contract is nothing more than the collective will, actions, and consent of the masses to the systems they form among themselves (including ethical norms and recognition or non-recognition of any given power or authority)
The only way it's used is to justify the acts of the state.
It can do no such thing; nothing can other than the rhetoric ofthe supporters of the state. The social contract merely describes the way groups function and the manner in which people interact. It is descriptive only.