Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This lib activist kills his girlfriend - stuffs her in a closet - flees to Europe and 30 years later is finally extradicted.
Death Penalty if I ever saw one.................................
Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!
Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!
Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!
The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.
Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!
The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.
Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.
Was it wrong to go to Europe and murder the Nazis???
Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.
Was it wrong to go to Europe and murder the Nazis???
That's war. We're talking about crime.
Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!
The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.
Was it wrong to go to Europe and murder the Nazis???
That's war. We're talking about crime.
There is a fine line between the two. Obama Admin wants them to be the same. 9-11 was a crime, not a war, right?
Whats the difference? Nazis did mass killings. How is that different from, say, Jeffrey Dahmer being a mass killer? If we are ok sending men to kill an army of mass murderers, why is it then wrong to send a few to kill an individual mass murderer????? Logically and morally, I see no difference.
That's war. We're talking about crime.
There is a fine line between the two. Obama Admin wants them to be the same. 9-11 was a crime, not a war, right?
Whats the difference? Nazis did mass killings. How is that different from, say, Jeffrey Dahmer being a mass killer? If we are ok sending men to kill an army of mass murderers, why is it then wrong to send a few to kill an individual mass murderer????? Logically and morally, I see no difference.
oy
The difference between the Nazis and Jeff Dalhmer is: one is a national government, the other and individual. In the case of national governments doing wrongs against society or another National government, war can be declared.
When an individual commits crimes here in the United States of America, we conduct something called a trial. During that trial, evidence of the crime is presented and the individual on trial gets a chance at defending himself.
Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.
Like innocent babies. Tell those parents that have to use in vitro their babies weren't babies til they were born. Tell Steve Jobs' birth mother his life started when she gave him up for adoption. If killing is wrong, killing is wrong....period.
Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.
Like innocent babies. Tell those parents that have to use in vitro their babies weren't babies til they were born. Tell Steve Jobs' birth mother his life started when she gave him up for adoption. If killing is wrong, killing is wrong....period.
How can something be killed if it hasn't been born yet?
Morality has little to do with my opposition to capital punishment. War is war and, being human beings, must be conducted from time to time.There is a fine line between the two. Obama Admin wants them to be the same. 9-11 was a crime, not a war, right?
Whats the difference? Nazis did mass killings. How is that different from, say, Jeffrey Dahmer being a mass killer? If we are ok sending men to kill an army of mass murderers, why is it then wrong to send a few to kill an individual mass murderer????? Logically and morally, I see no difference.
oy
The difference between the Nazis and Jeff Dalhmer is: one is a national government, the other and individual. In the case of national governments doing wrongs against society or another National government, war can be declared.
When an individual commits crimes here in the United States of America, we conduct something called a trial. During that trial, evidence of the crime is presented and the individual on trial gets a chance at defending himself.
Fair enough. But: Are the two acts equally horrible morally? Dahmers 13 (not sure exact count) victims vs the Nazi's millions. Each life was equally seen with worth by the society. But the Nazi's were punished by death. Dahmer....you argue...should have been kept alive on society's payroll.
Equal atrocity should recieve equal punishment, in my opinion. If there were 100 Jeffrey Dahmers running rampant in a town killing hundreds, its no doubt the local SWAT teams would be sent to hunt them down and kill them, correct?
Like innocent babies. Tell those parents that have to use in vitro their babies weren't babies til they were born. Tell Steve Jobs' birth mother his life started when she gave him up for adoption. If killing is wrong, killing is wrong....period.
How can something be killed if it hasn't been born yet?
It can be.
Senator Obama of Illinois voted AGAINST a bill that would ban the following act: A doctor attempts an abortion. THe baby survives. It is outside the womb, crying, breathing. THe doctor discards it into a trash can and it dies.
That is being done in Illinois. Obama voted to protect that act.
A baby can be born, living, breathing, and legally murdered by negligence in care. That is murder. And it's being done. And Obama supported it.