Libs excuse for crimminal behavior

[ginscpy]

"Its a bad law."

 

[ginscpy]

This lib activist kills his girlfriend - stuffs her in a closet - flees to Europe and 30 years later is finally extradicted.

Death Penalty if I ever saw one.................................

 

[BlindBoo]

Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!

 

[HUGGY]

This lib activist kills his girlfriend - stuffs her in a closet - flees to Europe and 30 years later is finally extradicted.

Death Penalty if I ever saw one.................................

If she was a Christian Fundamentalist neo-con... He did the right thing.

 

[ginscpy]

fry the SOB in Old Sparky

 

[grunt11b]

Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!

The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.

 

[grunt11b]

I must have missed something,wheres the link to what you guys are talking about?

 

[bucs90]

Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!

The millions that support abortion?

Senator Obama when he voted NO to a bill that would ban the following: A doctor attempts and abortion, it fails, and the LIVING human baby is out of the womb, crying, breathing, begging for care. However, the doctor knows that baby was marked for death, so he lays it in a trash can and lets it die from exposure and lack of care. That is simply murder, an Illinois bill would have banned it, and Obama voted NO to passing that bill.

That is one liberal who thought banning that form of murder was a bad idea.

 

[ginscpy]

Why are executions so difficult.

The French had it right with the guiilotine. Quick and painless.



(used by the Left to execute their opps)

LOSE THE LETHAL INJECTIOB BS...............................................................

 

[Nosmo King]

Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!

The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.

Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.

 

[bucs90]

Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!

The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.

Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.

Was it wrong to go to Europe and murder the Nazis???

 

[Nosmo King]

The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.

Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.

Was it wrong to go to Europe and murder the Nazis???

That's war. We're talking about crime.

 

[bucs90]

Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.

Was it wrong to go to Europe and murder the Nazis???

That's war. We're talking about crime.

There is a fine line between the two. Obama Admin wants them to be the same. 9-11 was a crime, not a war, right?

Whats the difference? Nazis did mass killings. How is that different from, say, Jeffrey Dahmer being a mass killer? If we are ok sending men to kill an army of mass murderers, why is it then wrong to send a few to kill an individual mass murderer????? Logically and morally, I see no difference.

 

[naturegirl]

Name the lib that thinks Murder is a bad law!

The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.

Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.

Like innocent babies. Tell those parents that have to use in vitro their babies weren't babies til they were born. Tell Steve Jobs' birth mother his life started when she gave him up for adoption. If killing is wrong, killing is wrong....period.

 

[Nosmo King]

Was it wrong to go to Europe and murder the Nazis???

That's war. We're talking about crime.

There is a fine line between the two. Obama Admin wants them to be the same. 9-11 was a crime, not a war, right?

Whats the difference? Nazis did mass killings. How is that different from, say, Jeffrey Dahmer being a mass killer? If we are ok sending men to kill an army of mass murderers, why is it then wrong to send a few to kill an individual mass murderer????? Logically and morally, I see no difference.

oy

The difference between the Nazis and Jeff Dalhmer is: one is a national government, the other and individual. In the case of national governments doing wrongs against society or another National government, war can be declared.

When an individual commits crimes here in the United States of America, we conduct something called a trial. During that trial, evidence of the crime is presented and the individual on trial gets a chance at defending himself.

 

[bucs90]

That's war. We're talking about crime.

There is a fine line between the two. Obama Admin wants them to be the same. 9-11 was a crime, not a war, right?

Whats the difference? Nazis did mass killings. How is that different from, say, Jeffrey Dahmer being a mass killer? If we are ok sending men to kill an army of mass murderers, why is it then wrong to send a few to kill an individual mass murderer????? Logically and morally, I see no difference.

oy

The difference between the Nazis and Jeff Dalhmer is: one is a national government, the other and individual. In the case of national governments doing wrongs against society or another National government, war can be declared.

When an individual commits crimes here in the United States of America, we conduct something called a trial. During that trial, evidence of the crime is presented and the individual on trial gets a chance at defending himself.

Fair enough. But: Are the two acts equally horrible morally? Dahmers 13 (not sure exact count) victims vs the Nazi's millions. Each life was equally seen with worth by the society. But the Nazi's were punished by death. Dahmer....you argue...should have been kept alive on society's payroll.

Equal atrocity should recieve equal punishment, in my opinion. If there were 100 Jeffrey Dahmers running rampant in a town killing hundreds, its no doubt the local SWAT teams would be sent to hunt them down and kill them, correct?

 

[RDD_1210]

The ones lobbying to ban the death penalty.

Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.

Like innocent babies. Tell those parents that have to use in vitro their babies weren't babies til they were born. Tell Steve Jobs' birth mother his life started when she gave him up for adoption. If killing is wrong, killing is wrong....period.

How can something be killed if it hasn't been born yet?

 

[bucs90]

Wrong! Murder is still a crime. The state murdering someone is a mistake.

Like innocent babies. Tell those parents that have to use in vitro their babies weren't babies til they were born. Tell Steve Jobs' birth mother his life started when she gave him up for adoption. If killing is wrong, killing is wrong....period.

How can something be killed if it hasn't been born yet?

It can be.

Senator Obama of Illinois voted AGAINST a bill that would ban the following act: A doctor attempts an abortion. THe baby survives. It is outside the womb, crying, breathing. THe doctor discards it into a trash can and it dies.

That is being done in Illinois. Obama voted to protect that act.

A baby can be born, living, breathing, and legally murdered by negligence in care. That is murder. And it's being done. And Obama supported it.

 

[Nosmo King]

There is a fine line between the two. Obama Admin wants them to be the same. 9-11 was a crime, not a war, right?

Whats the difference? Nazis did mass killings. How is that different from, say, Jeffrey Dahmer being a mass killer? If we are ok sending men to kill an army of mass murderers, why is it then wrong to send a few to kill an individual mass murderer????? Logically and morally, I see no difference.

oy

The difference between the Nazis and Jeff Dalhmer is: one is a national government, the other and individual. In the case of national governments doing wrongs against society or another National government, war can be declared.

When an individual commits crimes here in the United States of America, we conduct something called a trial. During that trial, evidence of the crime is presented and the individual on trial gets a chance at defending himself.

Fair enough. But: Are the two acts equally horrible morally? Dahmers 13 (not sure exact count) victims vs the Nazi's millions. Each life was equally seen with worth by the society. But the Nazi's were punished by death. Dahmer....you argue...should have been kept alive on society's payroll.

Equal atrocity should recieve equal punishment, in my opinion. If there were 100 Jeffrey Dahmers running rampant in a town killing hundreds, its no doubt the local SWAT teams would be sent to hunt them down and kill them, correct?

Morality has little to do with my opposition to capital punishment. War is war and, being human beings, must be conducted from time to time.

Capital punishment PRESUMES the one thing Conservatives can never presume: that the state is infallible, correct, efficient and fair.

One mistake, one incompetent defense attorney, one coerced confession and a human life hangs in the balance. DNA evidence has freed countless innocent people. What makes anyone think that the same government that cannot be trusted with providing health insurance can suddenly be trusted with executing someone without making a mistake?

 

[RDD_1210]

Like innocent babies. Tell those parents that have to use in vitro their babies weren't babies til they were born. Tell Steve Jobs' birth mother his life started when she gave him up for adoption. If killing is wrong, killing is wrong....period.

How can something be killed if it hasn't been born yet?

It can be.

Senator Obama of Illinois voted AGAINST a bill that would ban the following act: A doctor attempts an abortion. THe baby survives. It is outside the womb, crying, breathing. THe doctor discards it into a trash can and it dies.

That is being done in Illinois. Obama voted to protect that act.

A baby can be born, living, breathing, and legally murdered by negligence in care. That is murder. And it's being done. And Obama supported it.

Sounds terrible. Link so I can read more?