Levin: Landmark Legal to File 'Immediate' Lawsuit if House Dems Use Slaughter Solutio

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by SuMar, Mar 18, 2010.

  1. SuMar
    Offline

    SuMar VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,864
    Thanks Received:
    244
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +244
    My hero Mark Levin promises to raise some hell if the flim-flam happens...tyranny is all about it..

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. bodecea
    Online

    bodecea Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    89,162
    Thanks Received:
    10,379
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    #HasNoClothes
    Ratings:
    +23,679
    Your Hero is certainly welcome to file any lawsuit his heart desires.
     
  3. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,579
    Thanks Received:
    5,904
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,999
    It is illegal and unconstitutional to try and pass a bill with no vote. Or did no one teach we are a Representative Republic with actual rules of democracy in our Congress?
     
  4. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,064
    :cuckoo:

    Actually, no he isn't. Outside the realm of the "thinking" of the modern American "liberal," lawsuits are supposed to be filed only when there is a good faith basis (factually and regarding the legal arguments to be made) supporting them.

    As to the proper basis for the filing of a lawsuit, Mr. Levin is a Constitutional legal scholar and he doesn't require the permission of boredtoseeya to file a suit.

    As to the underlying merits, Mark Levin's analysis is already spelled out. Although it runs contrary to the nature of the modern American "liberal," one is really required to actually take a look at the Constitution in order to see why the methodology proposed by the House is invalid.

    Article I, Section 7 is not in the slightest bit unclear. The House "Rule" proposal unquestionably violates it.

    To argue that other uses have been made, historically, of such a self-effectuating rule is to entirely miss the point. If something has been done in the past (generally over procedural matters), but it was improper to do it that way provides no support for us doing it again, now, especially on a non-procedural matter. How absurd.

    Whether the prospective Levin lawsuit would work is another story. Our Judiciary is lame, too. But it's worth trying!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  5. Zona
    Offline

    Zona A guy in ariZONA

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    13,874
    Thanks Received:
    941
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ.
    Ratings:
    +942
    You know a person is low if Hannity actually looks up to him. Its like looking up to see the belly of a slug. Levin is on the same level as Savage as far as I am concerned. He is a horrible, horrible joke. Now saying that, lets see what comes of what he says. When nothing happens or is accomplished, you will have to admit he is a joke as well.

    will wait for the apology and disavowing of that idiot. Cant wait.
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2010
  6. Zona
    Offline

    Zona A guy in ariZONA

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    13,874
    Thanks Received:
    941
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ.
    Ratings:
    +942
    Fox talking points are so cute. Especially when people dont look into something before commenting. Its cute really.
     
  7. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Even your Messiah recognizes the power of Fox News. :lol::lol::lol: Funny he would waste his very important time giving an interview on Fox since they are such an 'illegitimate' news organization. Your Messiah is a pathetic liar and was shown to be a total ass by Bret. :lol:
     
  8. Oldandtired
    Offline

    Oldandtired BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,618
    Thanks Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Long Island
    Ratings:
    +349
    Any American who speaks his or her voice in opposition to government decisions is a hero in my eyes.

    This includes our founders as they did so against tyranny, Cindy Sheehan as she did against the Iraqui war, the Tea Partyers as they are doing agains6t government expansion and intervention in the private sector...etc...etc...etc.

    It is what defines us as America
     
  9. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,064
    A complete stumbling bumblefuck like you, autoZona, is in no position to assess such things. You are far too stupid to comprehend what's even going on, much less what is actually at stake.

    Mark Levin's farts are smarter than you on your best days.

    And you are also wrong in that insipid conclusion of yours. Nobody says that Mark Levin and Landmark Legal will absolutely prevail when they file suit. The cards are, after all, stacked and weighted by virtue of the fact that our Judicial Branch often pays no allegiance to the Constitution either. But if the issue gets raised before a Court that does understand what the Constitution says and cares about the oath judges take to adhere TO the Constitution, then the House "Rule" method of purportedly "passing" this health care monstrosity should go down in flames.

    IT is not at all surprising that a pissant like you is indifferent to the glaringly obvious violation of the Constitution even in the probable method of "passing" the House measure. Thankfully, not all people are as openly dishonest about such things as you are.
     
  10. gautama
    Offline

    gautama BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,355
    Thanks Received:
    336
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +336
    Zonya Bolonya,

    Something that should be OBVIOUS to one and all.

    When an ANTI-Obamarrhoid makes a mistake........and that does happen in one out of a hundred pronouncements on this Forum, and usually either admitted to.....or retracted....IT BECOMES A BIG DEAL !!!!!

    On the other hand, when Political Idiots like you Obamarrhoids CONSTANTLY PUKE OUT PUKE.......... AND......... ITS ALMOST IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZED AS....... PUKE.........THEN.....SINCE IT'S PAR FOR THE COURSE.......LIFE GOES ON WITHOUT A FUCKING MURMUR (usually).

    JUST AS IN THIS CASE.

    A Political Idiot LIKE you, a CERTIFIED OBAMARRHOID ...... is all AGOG that a POSSIBILITY exists that an ANTI-OBAMARRHOID IS WRONG.....and is DEMANDING an "EXPECTED APOLOGY".......

    BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FACT THAT ZONYA BOLONYA IS WRONG (not WILL be wrong) .........WHAT HAPPENS THEN ????

    I'll tell ya: PROBABLY NONE OF US ANTI-OBAMARRHOIDS WILL POINT THE MISTAKE TO THE OBAMARRHOID FREAK BECAUSE IT'S PAR FOR THE COURSE.
     

Share This Page