Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course, when Libs say "global warming" they use GLOBAL statistics, but when CON$ claim global cooling they not only use very LOCAL stats, they claim snow in the dead of Winter, even when the temp the day of the snowfall was above average, is a new Ice Age.Lets have some fun at the expense of Libs
Cold temps and snowstorms help prove Global Warming they say.
Lets use the same reasoning in other matters.
Kansas City is a more violent city than it was last year. This is proven by the drop in violent crime.
Boy you people are really uninformed. Go read up on global warming. Pockets of localized cold weather does not mean the entire globe is cooling.
We are having fun at the expense of these incredibly stupid things some of you cons have to say. Such an embarrassment to human intelligence
Good point.... except.... every time it gets to be unseasonably hot, you libtards always yell.... "global warming". But yet, while it might be hot there, it is cooler than normal somewhere else.
How about a little consistency.
You guys claim that CO2 raises temps... no doubt about it and all the smart people know it.
So... did all the co2 all the sudden vanish on the east coast? Where did it go? Does the US get credit then for reducing global warming since those gases aren't there to warm us up anymore?
Lets have some fun at the expense of Libs
Cold temps and snowstorms help prove Global Warming they say.They do?
Warmer earth evaporates more ocean water.
More moisture in the air means more rain and snow.
More rain and snow means more eratic weather patterns.
Its really fucking simple but some people are so hacked up in their brains due to fanatical love of party over facts they are unable to see anything.
There's that RETARDED lie again.there has been no global warming since 1998.
But despite overwhelming signs of global cooling -
"The World Meteorological Organization's secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, told the BBC it was likely that La Nina would continue into the summer."
"This would mean global temperatures have not risen since 1998, prompting some to question climate change theory."
Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?Warmer earth evaporates more ocean water.
More moisture in the air means more rain and snow.
More rain and snow means more eratic weather patterns.
Its really fucking simple but some people are so hacked up in their brains due to fanatical love of party over facts they are unable to see anything.
So... let me try to understand this.....
The temperature of Washington DC in the middle of winter is so warm that massive amounts of moisture are sent into the atmosphere.. therefore.. all this moisture has to fall back to the earth?
Can you explain where this moisture is coming from in the winter months? Is it your claim that there is massive evaporation in weather conditions that average around 30 degrees?
Do you understand that air at 30 degrees is very dry?
Wow... you are more stupid than i thought.
☭proletarian☭;1998377 said:Good point.... except.... every time it gets to be unseasonably hot, you libtards always yell.... "global warming". But yet, while it might be hot there, it is cooler than normal somewhere else.
Which is it?
a retard might say that, I don't, and many other's don't. So stop lying
we say its global warming too
Of course, when Libs say "global warming" they use GLOBAL statistics, but when CON$ claim global cooling they not only use very LOCAL stats, they claim snow in the dead of Winter, even when the temp the day of the snowfall was above average, is a new Ice Age.Boy you people are really uninformed. Go read up on global warming. Pockets of localized cold weather does not mean the entire globe is cooling.
We are having fun at the expense of these incredibly stupid things some of you cons have to say. Such an embarrassment to human intelligence
Good point.... except.... every time it gets to be unseasonably hot, you libtards always yell.... "global warming". But yet, while it might be hot there, it is cooler than normal somewhere else.
How about a little consistency.
You guys claim that CO2 raises temps... no doubt about it and all the smart people know it.
So... did all the co2 all the sudden vanish on the east coast? Where did it go? Does the US get credit then for reducing global warming since those gases aren't there to warm us up anymore?
Warmer earth evaporates more ocean water.
More moisture in the air means more rain and snow.
More rain and snow means more eratic weather patterns.
Its really fucking simple but some people are so hacked up in their brains due to fanatical love of party over facts they are unable to see anything.
So... let me try to understand this.....
The temperature of Washington DC in the middle of winter is so warm that massive amounts of moisture are sent into the atmosphere.. therefore.. all this moisture has to fall back to the earth?
Can you explain where this moisture is coming from in the winter months? Is it your claim that there is massive evaporation in weather conditions that average around 30 degrees?
Do you understand that air at 30 degrees is very dry?
Wow... you are more stupid than i thought.
There's that RETARDED lie again.there has been no global warming since 1998.
But despite overwhelming signs of global cooling -
"The World Meteorological Organization's secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, told the BBC it was likely that La Nina would continue into the summer."
"This would mean global temperatures have not risen since 1998, prompting some to question climate change theory."
The decade from 1999 to 2009 has been the WARMEST in the history of direct instrument measurement.
So let's have fun with CON$ervaTard "logic:"
1999 to 2009 was the warmest decade in the history of direct instrument measurement, so we've been cooling since 1998.
This thread certainly lost its fun.
No prayer in school! (Unless you are Muslim)
Lets have some fun at the expense of Libs
Cold temps and snowstorms help prove Global Warming they say.
Lets use the same reasoning in other matters.
Kansas City is a more violent city than it was last year. This is proven by the drop in violent crime.
Boy you people are really uninformed. Go read up on global warming. Pockets of localized cold weather does not mean the entire globe is cooling.
We are having fun at the expense of these incredibly stupid things some of you cons have to say. Such an embarrassment to human intelligence
Gee a few posts earlier we were not warming since 1998, now it's only 4 years.There's that RETARDED lie again.there has been no global warming since 1998.
But despite overwhelming signs of global cooling -
"The World Meteorological Organization's secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, told the BBC it was likely that La Nina would continue into the summer."
"This would mean global temperatures have not risen since 1998, prompting some to question climate change theory."
The decade from 1999 to 2009 has been the WARMEST in the history of direct instrument measurement.
So let's have fun with CON$ervaTard "logic:"
1999 to 2009 was the warmest decade in the history of direct instrument measurement, so we've been cooling since 1998.
According to man-made global warming advocates, CO2 emissions are the main driver of climate change and natural weather patterns caused by sun activity and other native contributors play second fiddle.
But here we have UN climate scientists admitting that natural climate change contributors have eclipsed the effect of CO2 emissions for the past 10 years, even as carbon belchers like China and India have increased CO2 output at record levels!
Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below).
Indeed, the latest evidence from climatological surveys shows that the earths upper oceans and the troposphere, the primary indicators of climate change, have not been warming for the last four years.
Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?Warmer earth evaporates more ocean water.
More moisture in the air means more rain and snow.
More rain and snow means more eratic weather patterns.
Its really fucking simple but some people are so hacked up in their brains due to fanatical love of party over facts they are unable to see anything.
So... let me try to understand this.....
The temperature of Washington DC in the middle of winter is so warm that massive amounts of moisture are sent into the atmosphere.. therefore.. all this moisture has to fall back to the earth?
Can you explain where this moisture is coming from in the winter months? Is it your claim that there is massive evaporation in weather conditions that average around 30 degrees?
Do you understand that air at 30 degrees is very dry?
Wow... you are more stupid than i thought.
What a moron!
Gee a few posts earlier we were not warming since 1998, now it's only 4 years.There's that RETARDED lie again.
The decade from 1999 to 2009 has been the WARMEST in the history of direct instrument measurement.
So let's have fun with CON$ervaTard "logic:"
1999 to 2009 was the warmest decade in the history of direct instrument measurement, so we've been cooling since 1998.
According to man-made global warming advocates, CO2 emissions are the main driver of climate change and natural weather patterns caused by sun activity and other native contributors play second fiddle.
But here we have UN climate scientists admitting that natural climate change contributors have eclipsed the effect of CO2 emissions for the past 10 years, even as carbon belchers like China and India have increased CO2 output at record levels!
Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below).
Indeed, the latest evidence from climatological surveys shows that the earth’s upper oceans and the troposphere, the primary indicators of climate change, have not been warming for the last four years.
Notice when CON$ lie about temp they ALWAYS use the UAH data that used the opposite sign to "correct" for diurnal satellite drift. Even after Christy and Spencer were caught with their cooked numbers and they were corrected and the correct chart was posted. CON$ NEVER use the correct data. Three guess why, and the first two don't count.
First of all it doesn't have to be " much warmer than usual" just warmer than the air it collides with. And the warm moist air that caused the bulk of the snow in the nor'easter that hit the east coast came from the Atlantic Ocean.Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?So... let me try to understand this.....
The temperature of Washington DC in the middle of winter is so warm that massive amounts of moisture are sent into the atmosphere.. therefore.. all this moisture has to fall back to the earth?
Can you explain where this moisture is coming from in the winter months? Is it your claim that there is massive evaporation in weather conditions that average around 30 degrees?
Do you understand that air at 30 degrees is very dry?
Wow... you are more stupid than i thought.
What a moron!
I do understand that. I am wondering where this moisture was evaporated from. What superheated part of the earth did it come from?
In order for your claim to have any substance, you must know where this moisture came frmo and that it came from a part of the earth that is much warmer than usual.
First of all it doesn't have to be " much warmer than usual" just warmer than the air it collides with. And the warm moist air that caused the bulk of the snow in the nor'easter that hit the east coast came from the Atlantic Ocean.Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?
What a moron!
I do understand that. I am wondering where this moisture was evaporated from. What superheated part of the earth did it come from?
In order for your claim to have any substance, you must know where this moisture came frmo and that it came from a part of the earth that is much warmer than usual.
Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?Warmer earth evaporates more ocean water.
More moisture in the air means more rain and snow.
More rain and snow means more eratic weather patterns.
Its really fucking simple but some people are so hacked up in their brains due to fanatical love of party over facts they are unable to see anything.
So... let me try to understand this.....
The temperature of Washington DC in the middle of winter is so warm that massive amounts of moisture are sent into the atmosphere.. therefore.. all this moisture has to fall back to the earth?
Can you explain where this moisture is coming from in the winter months? Is it your claim that there is massive evaporation in weather conditions that average around 30 degrees?
Do you understand that air at 30 degrees is very dry?
Wow... you are more stupid than i thought.
What a moron!
Christy and Spencer have already admitted that the chart you posted used the opposite sign in correcting for diurnal satellite drift. The chart I posted uses the correct sign and shows warming.Gee a few posts earlier we were not warming since 1998, now it's only 4 years.According to man-made global warming advocates, CO2 emissions are the main driver of climate change and natural weather patterns caused by sun activity and other native contributors play second fiddle.
But here we have UN climate scientists admitting that natural climate change contributors have eclipsed the effect of CO2 emissions for the past 10 years, even as carbon belchers like China and India have increased CO2 output at record levels!
Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below).
Indeed, the latest evidence from climatological surveys shows that the earth’s upper oceans and the troposphere, the primary indicators of climate change, have not been warming for the last four years.
Notice when CON$ lie about temp they ALWAYS use the UAH data that used the opposite sign to "correct" for diurnal satellite drift. Even after Christy and Spencer were caught with their cooked numbers and they were corrected and the correct chart was posted. CON$ NEVER use the correct data. Three guess why, and the first two don't count.
What's wrong you having a hard time reading, if you notice right above the first graph it states "Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below). "
Prove the graph I provided was incorrect!
