Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is called being too smart by half..."Left" and "Right" are both necessary for balance, like Yin and Yang. To suggest one of them must be eliminated is just fucking mindless.
This is called being too smart by half..."Left" and "Right" are both necessary for balance, like Yin and Yang. To suggest one of them must be eliminated is just fucking mindless.
Ropey was arrested for a hate crime when he yelled, "I hate fags", and punched himself in the face.
Sooo.... still no link to any story. All righty then. Must be skeered.
tl;dr
Well Ropey you bring out another reason against hate crime legislation
(besides it isn't effective, it adds more to the costs and legal procedures,
but doesn't produce any added effect than if you charged the crime normally
-- this coming from a prison reform advocate who is the most ardent liberal I know!!!)
that "racially motivated" is SUBJECTIVE and FAITH BASED.
So this is disrimination by creed to even try to define much less enforce
something "faith based" - it depends on people's SUBJECTIVE beliefs!
Good post Ropey
It's not just that the laws don't apply equally,
but should NOT be applied at all because it requires govt establishing
faith based beliefs if something is racially motivated or not.
We should just use discrimination laws in general
whether that's race, religion or creed, and not have to prove it was race.
Just discrimination by depriving someone of rights and protections
without due process. Maybe by creed or belief would be enough,
because the attacker's beliefs were in opposition or conflict with the victims or their perception.
Or the other way around, the victim has different beliefs that the offender violated.
Just conflicting beliefs should be enough to show discrimination occurred.
whether or not it was race per se, BELIEFS ABOUT RACE still count as BELIEFS and CREED.
You can PROVE people have different or conflicting BELIEFS
and invoke anti-discrimination laws on those grounds.
This would ALSO solve the issue with LGBT vs Christian
BELIEFS so they are treated equally where govt remains NEUTRAL of judgment calls
instead of endorsing one and penalizing the other.
If we treat race related conflicts as differences in BELIEFS, you don't have to
prove those to show there was a conflict and discrimination by attacking someone
due to BELIEFS (or being a victim whose beliefs were violated),
regardless what the content of those beliefs were that don't require proof of validity.
^Clearly has caught the dis-ease. Good to find such a premier example. Thanks.
Let me halp.
At ease, Pogo.
And in Megantic Joal?
Suc mon grien.
^Clearly has caught the dis-ease. Good to find such a premier example. Thanks.
Let me halp.
At ease, Pogo.
And in Megantic Joal?
Suc mon grien.
Ce thread-ci est completement con.
^Clearly has caught the dis-ease. Good to find such a premier example. Thanks.
Let me halp.
At ease, Pogo.
And in Megantic Joal?
Suc mon grien.
Ce thread-ci est completement con.
I doubt if anyone else will come in and mimic unease as well as you have in this thread, but whatcha gonna do?
Pogo said:"unease"?