tjvh
Senior Member
- May 10, 2012
- 6,893
- 918
- 48
The facts for that remain to be established.
If the current facts about the dubbing being done without the actor's knowledge, and he didnt have a contract with them stating he could do it (he probably did) then they could go after him civilliy for fraud.
Dubbing what the actors say and subjecting them to possible attacks is reprehensible
Which should remind people to always read what you sign. If this guy is a shifty as people are saying, I am almost sure he had a clause allowing him to modify the film as to content, without the actor's consent.
Still buying into that violence was caused by a Movie nonsense?