Leaked Secret Information Led To The Right Wing Machine Trying To Shake Down Roberts

[Listening]

Where did you go? No one on the right stands for the constitution and against the crony attacks on it by the right?

I have a job jackass.

And I have not fully digested the article.

But, I do know that Obama challenged the SCOTUS openly.

Are you going to denounce that ?

 

[tererun]

If there was outside pressure from either side...(like Obama's diareah of the mouth), there should be dire consequences.

Obama should have been castigated for his remarks.

Roberts should not be reading the papers.

Translation: WAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH I did not get my way WAHHHHHHHH!

Seriously, can someone tell this kid his parents need to give him a reason to cry like this?

 

[bodecea]

People with negative rep should be limited to a couple thread starts per day.

Why?

 

[Listening]

If there was outside pressure from either side...(like Obama's diareah of the mouth), there should be dire consequences.

Obama should have been castigated for his remarks.

Roberts should not be reading the papers.

Translation: WAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH I did not get my way WAHHHHHHHH!

Seriously, can someone tell this kid his parents need to give him a reason to cry like this?

How did I say that ?

I said, if there was outside pressure from either side.

Grow up sperm-tail, and learn how to comprehend.

 

[Black_Label]

Where did you go? No one on the right stands for the constitution and against the crony attacks on it by the right?

I have a job jackass.

And I have not fully digested the article.

This should help it go down.

The GOP pretends to be pro-constitution, but in reality they hate it.

They will crap all over the constitution by shaking down judges and trashing them when they don't get what they want.

The truth is the today's GOP are a mockery of what they once were. Their agenda is set out to destroy america and the greatness the founding fathers set out for it to be at all costs.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

This is pretty damning evidence against the GOP thugs. Roberts initially sided with voting against the ACA, but later had second thoughts as he had to do the right thing by upholding the constitution, and not crapping all over it to appease to what the GOP wanted.
This put the GOP into an uproar and they somehow acquired secret leaked information and tried to use their thuggery to get Roberts to vote against the constitution, and for their right wing cronyism, which failed.

It's pretty damn funny that the party supposedly for "pro constitution!" is quick to try and shred it to pieces just so they get what they want,...

John Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and the Supreme Court’s Unprecedented Leak | Swampland | TIME.com

Umm, what?

Did you even read the article you linked to?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

It's a tax. Roberts correctly identified it as a tax.

If you don't like the tax, take Roberts' advice and get rid of the executive and legislators that voted for the tax.

It's a tax, only if you also believe that paying a fine for a speeding ticket is also a "tax", or paying a fine for violating ANY law is a "tax".

It's pretty simple logic, junior.

Roberts voted the way he did because he wants the American people to "experience" what massive left wing economic destruction is all about, with the end result being the destruction of the Democrat party for many, many years to come.

"We The People" have had enough of leftist political ideology and shortsighted and nonsensical leftist legislative nightmares. Roberts wants to make sure those "on the fence" FINALLY "get it".

The joke is on YOU, leftist lemmings.

Enjoy your Obamacare.

Roberts is so stupid he thinks a speeding ticket is a tax?

 

[Si modo]

This is pretty damning evidence against the GOP thugs. Roberts initially sided with voting against the ACA, but later had second thoughts as he had to do the right thing by upholding the constitution, and not crapping all over it to appease to what the GOP wanted.
This put the GOP into an uproar and they somehow acquired secret leaked information and tried to use their thuggery to get Roberts to vote against the constitution, and for their right wing cronyism, which failed.

It's pretty damn funny that the party supposedly for "pro constitution!" is quick to try and shred it to pieces just so they get what they want,...

John Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and the Supreme Court’s Unprecedented Leak | Swampland | TIME.com

Ohhhh, my anonymous sources told someone I know that they heard from someone else that they overheard at a bar on the Hill that the leak wasn't really a leak, but a conspiracy to make utter morons show themselves as utter morons.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

It's a tax. Roberts correctly identified it as a tax.

If you don't like the tax, take Roberts' advice and get rid of the executive and legislators that voted for the tax.

It's a tax, only if you also believe that paying a fine for a speeding ticket is also a "tax", or paying a fine for violating ANY law is a "tax".

It's pretty simple logic, junior.

Roberts voted the way he did because he wants the American people to "experience" what massive left wing economic destruction is all about, with the end result being the destruction of the Democrat party for many, many years to come.

"We The People" have had enough of leftist political ideology and shortsighted and nonsensical leftist legislative nightmares. Roberts wants to make sure those "on the fence" FINALLY "get it".

The joke is on YOU, leftist lemmings.

Enjoy your Obamacare.

Roberts is so stupid he thinks a speeding ticket is a tax?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/232322-quantum-bagged-by-biggles.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/law-a...rsus-right-wing-ideologues-4.html#post5556865

Quantum: You just argued directly opposite of what Roberts ruled about the mandate, congratulations.

Dante: actually, word for word (in red) it is from Roberts ruling.



actually, you have no idea what you are talking about

 

[Ernie S.]

It's a tax. Roberts correctly identified it as a tax.

If you don't like the tax, take Roberts' advice and get rid of the executive and legislators that voted for the tax.

That's not what the topic is about,...

No the topic is about some conspiracy theory.

Mods: Move this crap where it belongs.

 

[blackhawk]

And all of this based on unnamed knowledgeable sources close to the court how tabloid like.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Gee: I found this which makes the information in the OP out to lunch.


As Breitbart News suggested last week, it appears Chief Justice John Roberts did, in fact, switch his vote on the Obamacare decision under pressure from President Barack Obama, the Democrats, and the mainstream media. John Fund at National Review has more details today--including evidence about a bizarre address by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chair of the Judiciary Committee, that singled out Roberts himself:

Indeed, Senator Patrick Leahy (Vt., D.) , the chair of the Judiciary Committee, suddenly took to the floor on May 14 and directly addressed Roberts, urging him in harshly partisan tones to uphold Obamacare and maintain “the proper role of the judicial branch.”

Stewart Baker, a partner at the Washington law firm Steptoe & Johnson, writes at the Volokh Conspiracy that he found the whole campaign against Roberts weird and unusual, given that the justices’ conference vote on Obamacare had been held six weeks earlier. Why “would the chair of the Judiciary Committee risk the appearance of trying to harshly strongarm the Court when his remarks wouldn’t make the slightest difference?” he asks. “The Leahy speech reads like it was written for an audience of one. It offers flattery and it offers threats, all of them personalized to appeal to Chief Justice Roberts alone.”

Fund adds that the White House likely benefited from leaks at the Court, and almost certainly knew of Roberts's switch--just as it almost certainly knew of the initial vote to throw out the individual mandate in March:

More Scorn for Chief Justice Roberts as Details of Switch Leak

John Fund? The guy who introduced Fair and Balanced Rush to the East Coast Elite way back when? The same John Fund who kept the Vince Foster and Whitewater shit on the WSJ editorial pages?

that John Fund?

--- deflection aside:

"Supreme Court leaks — especially one originating so close to the bench and coming just a few days after a ruling of such gravity — are virtually unheard of, even if all the circumstances the story describes are not."

Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2012/07/0...reme-courts-unprecedented-leak/#ixzz1zW8VedXw
"

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

If there was outside pressure from either side...(like Obama's diareah of the mouth), there should be dire consequences.

Obama should have been castigated for his remarks.

Roberts should not be reading the papers.

of real importance:

"Supreme Court leaks — especially one originating so close to the bench and coming just a few days after a ruling of such gravity — are virtually unheard of, even if all the circumstances the story describes are not."

Read more: Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and Court's Surprising Leak | Swampland | TIME.com


It's like America's Murdoch scandal....right wingers going after people in power

 

[freedombecki]

This is pretty damning evidence against the GOP thugs. Roberts initially sided with voting against the ACA, but later had second thoughts as he had to do the right thing by upholding the constitution, and not crapping all over it to appease to what the GOP wanted.
This put the GOP into an uproar and they somehow acquired secret leaked information and tried to use their thuggery to get Roberts to vote against the constitution, and for their right wing cronyism, which failed.

It's pretty damn funny that the party supposedly for "pro constitution!" is quick to try and shred it to pieces just so they get what they want,...

John Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and the Supreme Court’s Unprecedented Leak | Swampland | TIME.com

Time.com? Aren't they the Old Liars Club founders.

The Democrats intentionally wrote a bill that would be a Constitutional double entendre and difficult to understand or regulate judicially.

John Roberts is a man of conscience and by following his did the right thing and taught the rest of us that the main thrust of the bill was to obfuscate the heinous tax hike that it represents and to get ready to sell the homestead, because we can't afford the tax.

Now that we know what it is, we can fight it better, cut to the chase, and get people some benefits but not the kind of benefits that hatch Roe v. Wades all over the place.

Most of all, we need to get rid of the kind of crap that burdens the working people who pay taxes to reward those who don't care to work because they can't stand to be told what to do by a boss who does right.

John Roberts is no outcast. He's a good man who does the right thing, and many Republicans paid attention to his ruling and realized he was correct and right.

 

[Black_Label]

If there was outside pressure from either side...(like Obama's diareah of the mouth), there should be dire consequences.

Obama should have been castigated for his remarks.

Roberts should not be reading the papers.

of real importance:

"Supreme Court leaks — especially one originating so close to the bench and coming just a few days after a ruling of such gravity — are virtually unheard of, even if all the circumstances the story describes are not."

Read more: Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and Court's Surprising Leak | Swampland | TIME.com


It's like America's Murdoch scandal....right wingers going after people in power

Nailed it. The right wing thugs are shaking down everyone all the way to supreme court justices.

The hard right GOP and the right wing machine are the scum of this nation that doesn't give a damn about the constitution. The founding fathers must be rolling in their graves at this.

 

[Charles_Main]

It's a tax. Roberts correctly identified it as a tax.

If you don't like the tax, take Roberts' advice and get rid of the executive and legislators that voted for the tax.

It's a tax, only if you also believe that paying a fine for a speeding ticket is also a "tax", or paying a fine for violating ANY law is a "tax".

It's pretty simple logic, junior.

Roberts voted the way he did because he wants the American people to "experience" what massive left wing economic destruction is all about, with the end result being the destruction of the Democrat party for many, many years to come.

"We The People" have had enough of leftist political ideology and shortsighted and nonsensical leftist legislative nightmares. Roberts wants to make sure those "on the fence" FINALLY "get it".

The joke is on YOU, leftist lemmings.

Enjoy your Obamacare.

Ok then you agree it's not a tax, it's a penalty under the Commerce clause, and therefore according to this ruling. Is not Constitutional. Yet still you love it.

Thanks for playing.

 

[Si modo]

If there was outside pressure from either side...(like Obama's diareah of the mouth), there should be dire consequences.

Obama should have been castigated for his remarks.

Roberts should not be reading the papers.

of real importance:

"Supreme Court leaks — especially one originating so close to the bench and coming just a few days after a ruling of such gravity — are virtually unheard of, even if all the circumstances the story describes are not."

Read more: Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and Court's Surprising Leak | Swampland | TIME.com


It's like America's Murdoch scandal....right wingers going after people in power

Nailed it. The right wing thugs are shaking down everyone all the way to supreme court justices.

The hard right GOP and the right wing machine are the scum of this nation that doesn't give a damn about the constitution. The founding fathers must be rolling in their graves at this.

What YOU don't seem able to grasp is how the information in that piece means zero, as does all gossip.

And, I am not sure you would ever be able to grasp that.

 

[Vel]

This is pretty damning evidence against the GOP thugs. Roberts initially sided with voting against the ACA, but later had second thoughts as he had to do the right thing by upholding the constitution, and not crapping all over it to appease to what the GOP wanted.
This put the GOP into an uproar and they somehow acquired secret leaked information and tried to use their thuggery to get Roberts to vote against the constitution, and for their right wing cronyism, which failed.

It's pretty damn funny that the party supposedly for "pro constitution!" is quick to try and shred it to pieces just so they get what they want,...

John Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and the Supreme Court’s Unprecedented Leak | Swampland | TIME.com

Why does it not surprise me that someone who advertises to be a registered Democrat would choose to represent themselves with their head up their ass?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

If there was outside pressure from either side...(like Obama's diareah of the mouth), there should be dire consequences.

Obama should have been castigated for his remarks.

Roberts should not be reading the papers.

of real importance:

"Supreme Court leaks — especially one originating so close to the bench and coming just a few days after a ruling of such gravity — are virtually unheard of, even if all the circumstances the story describes are not."

Read more: Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and Court's Surprising Leak | Swampland | TIME.com


It's like America's Murdoch scandal....right wingers going after people in power

You should learn to read.

But Roberts pays attention to media coverage. As chief justice, he is keenly aware of his leadership role on the court, and he also is sensitive to how the court is perceived by the public.
There were countless news articles in May warning of damage to the court — and to Roberts’ reputation — if the court were to strike down the mandate. Leading politicians, including the president himself, had expressed confidence the mandate would be upheld.

 

[Black_Label]

This is pretty damning evidence against the GOP thugs. Roberts initially sided with voting against the ACA, but later had second thoughts as he had to do the right thing by upholding the constitution, and not crapping all over it to appease to what the GOP wanted.
This put the GOP into an uproar and they somehow acquired secret leaked information and tried to use their thuggery to get Roberts to vote against the constitution, and for their right wing cronyism, which failed.

It's pretty damn funny that the party supposedly for "pro constitution!" is quick to try and shred it to pieces just so they get what they want,...

John Roberts, Conservative Outcast, and the Supreme Court’s Unprecedented Leak | Swampland | TIME.com

Why does it not surprise me that someone who advertises to be a registered Democrat would choose to represent themselves with their head up their ass?

The head up their ass is the official seal of the republican party, which you seem to be a member of.